GoFundMe as a Medical Plan: Ecological Study of Crowdfunding Insulin Success.

Q2 Medicine JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2022-04-15 DOI:10.2196/33205
Julia E Blanchette, M J Tran, Ernest G Grigorian, Eli Iacob, Linda S Edelman, Tamara K Oser, Michelle L Litchman
{"title":"GoFundMe as a Medical Plan: Ecological Study of Crowdfunding Insulin Success.","authors":"Julia E Blanchette,&nbsp;M J Tran,&nbsp;Ernest G Grigorian,&nbsp;Eli Iacob,&nbsp;Linda S Edelman,&nbsp;Tamara K Oser,&nbsp;Michelle L Litchman","doi":"10.2196/33205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals in need of medical care turn to crowdfunding websites to engage a \"crowd\" or group for financial support. In the last decade, access to insulin has decreased considerably for several reasons, including the rising cost of insulin, increasing popularity of high-deductible insurance plans, and increasing insurance premiums. Many people with diabetes are forced to ration or go without insulin, and they turn to crowdfunding websites to seek financial donations to purchase insulin needed to reduce health risks and mortality, and sustain quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore crowdfunding campaign requests to purchase insulin in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective, quantitative, and qualitative study, we coded the text of GoFundMe online crowdfunding campaigns and viral measures (shares, hearts, and comments) from February 25 to April 15, 2019. We described campaigns (N=205) and explored the factors associated with campaign success using correlations and qualitative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of campaigns were initiated by middle-aged adults (age 26-64 years; 77/205, 37.6%), those with type 1 diabetes (94/205, 45.9%), and those needing funds owing to insurance coverage issues (125/205, 61.0%). The factors associated with campaign success included requests for ≤US $500 (P=.007) and higher viral measures (shares, P=.007; hearts, P<.001; comments, P=.002). The following 4 themes emerged from the campaign text: (1) desire for self-management and survival, (2) diabetes management untenable given insulin access, (3) aftermath of insulin unaffordability, and (4) privacy issues with crowdfunding. Campaign comments were both supportive (tangible, informational, and emotional) and unsupportive (questioned the need for the campaign and deemed crowdfunding inappropriate).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite crowdfunding websites being used to support the purchase of insulin, campaigns raised only a fraction of the money requested. Therefore, GoFundMe campaigns are not a reliable solution to obtain funds for insulin in the United States. Applying quantitative and qualitative methods is adequate to analyze online crowdfunding for costs of medications such as insulin. However, it is critical for people with diabetes to use resources other than online crowdfunding to access and obtain insulin owing to low success rates. Clinicians should routinely assess difficulty accessing or affording insulin, and federal health care policies should support lowering the cost of insulin.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"7 2","pages":"e33205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9055489/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/33205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Individuals in need of medical care turn to crowdfunding websites to engage a "crowd" or group for financial support. In the last decade, access to insulin has decreased considerably for several reasons, including the rising cost of insulin, increasing popularity of high-deductible insurance plans, and increasing insurance premiums. Many people with diabetes are forced to ration or go without insulin, and they turn to crowdfunding websites to seek financial donations to purchase insulin needed to reduce health risks and mortality, and sustain quality of life.

Objective: This study aimed to explore crowdfunding campaign requests to purchase insulin in the United States.

Methods: In this retrospective, quantitative, and qualitative study, we coded the text of GoFundMe online crowdfunding campaigns and viral measures (shares, hearts, and comments) from February 25 to April 15, 2019. We described campaigns (N=205) and explored the factors associated with campaign success using correlations and qualitative thematic analysis.

Results: The majority of campaigns were initiated by middle-aged adults (age 26-64 years; 77/205, 37.6%), those with type 1 diabetes (94/205, 45.9%), and those needing funds owing to insurance coverage issues (125/205, 61.0%). The factors associated with campaign success included requests for ≤US $500 (P=.007) and higher viral measures (shares, P=.007; hearts, P<.001; comments, P=.002). The following 4 themes emerged from the campaign text: (1) desire for self-management and survival, (2) diabetes management untenable given insulin access, (3) aftermath of insulin unaffordability, and (4) privacy issues with crowdfunding. Campaign comments were both supportive (tangible, informational, and emotional) and unsupportive (questioned the need for the campaign and deemed crowdfunding inappropriate).

Conclusions: Despite crowdfunding websites being used to support the purchase of insulin, campaigns raised only a fraction of the money requested. Therefore, GoFundMe campaigns are not a reliable solution to obtain funds for insulin in the United States. Applying quantitative and qualitative methods is adequate to analyze online crowdfunding for costs of medications such as insulin. However, it is critical for people with diabetes to use resources other than online crowdfunding to access and obtain insulin owing to low success rates. Clinicians should routinely assess difficulty accessing or affording insulin, and federal health care policies should support lowering the cost of insulin.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GoFundMe作为医疗计划:胰岛素众筹成功的生态学研究。
背景:需要医疗护理的个人转向众筹网站,以吸引“人群”或团体获得财务支持。在过去十年中,由于胰岛素成本的上升、高免赔额保险计划的日益普及以及保险费的增加,胰岛素的可及性大大降低。许多糖尿病患者被迫配给胰岛素或不使用胰岛素,他们转向众筹网站寻求资金捐赠,以购买所需的胰岛素,以降低健康风险和死亡率,并维持生活质量。目的:本研究旨在了解美国民众购买胰岛素的众筹活动。方法:在这项回顾性、定量和定性研究中,我们对2019年2月25日至4月15日期间GoFundMe在线众筹活动的文本和病毒式度量(分享、关注和评论)进行了编码。我们描述了活动(N=205),并使用相关性和定性主题分析探索了与活动成功相关的因素。结果:大多数运动是由中年人发起的(26-64岁;1型糖尿病患者(94/205,45.9%)和因保险问题需要资金的患者(125/205,61.0%)。与活动成功相关的因素包括≤500美元的请求(P=.007)和更高的病毒式传播措施(股票,P=.007;结论:尽管众筹网站被用来支持胰岛素的购买,但这些活动只筹集到所需资金的一小部分。因此,在美国,GoFundMe活动并不是获得胰岛素资金的可靠解决方案。使用定量和定性方法足以分析胰岛素等药物成本的在线众筹。然而,由于成功率较低,糖尿病患者使用在线众筹以外的资源获取和获得胰岛素至关重要。临床医生应定期评估获得或负担胰岛素的困难,联邦卫生保健政策应支持降低胰岛素的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Use of Activity Trackers to Support Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Adults Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Interview Study Using the RE-AIM Framework. Exploring Opportunities and Challenges for the Spread, Scale-Up, and Sustainability of mHealth Apps for Self-Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Netherlands: Citizen Science Approach. Personalized and Culturally Tailored Features of Mobile Apps for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact on Patient Self-Management: Scoping Review. Association of Blood Glucose Data With Physiological and Nutritional Data From Dietary Surveys and Wearable Devices: Database Analysis. Health and eHealth Literacy of Patients With Diabetes in Low-Income Countries: Perspective From Guinea and Burkina Faso.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1