Change in prefilter pressure as a key determinant in the decision to return blood in continuous renal replacement therapy: An observational study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1111/nicc.12933
Almudena Mateos-Dávila, Antonio Jorge Betbesé Roig, José Alberto Santos Rodríguez, Eva Maria Guix-Comellas
{"title":"Change in prefilter pressure as a key determinant in the decision to return blood in continuous renal replacement therapy: An observational study.","authors":"Almudena Mateos-Dávila, Antonio Jorge Betbesé Roig, José Alberto Santos Rodríguez, Eva Maria Guix-Comellas","doi":"10.1111/nicc.12933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), circuit coagulation is an important event that can result in suboptimal outcomes. Nurses must remain alert throughout the treatment and observe machine pressures. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) is commonly used for monitoring but it is sometimes too late to return blood to the patient.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the capacity of prefilter pressure (FP) versus TMP to predict the risk of circuit coagulation in adult patients with acute renal failure on CRRT.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An observational, longitudinal, prospective study. This study was carried out in a tertiary referral hospital over 2 years. Data collected included the following variables: TMP, filter or FP, effluent pressure, venous and arterial pressure, filtration fraction, and ultrafiltration constant of each circuit. Means and their trends over time were collected, for both diffusive and convective therapy and for two membrane types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 151 circuits (24 polysulfone and 127 acrylonitrile) were analysed, from 71 patients (n = 22 [34%] women; mean age, 66.5 [36-84] years). Of the total treatments, 80 were diffusive, and the rest were convective or mixed. In the diffusive circuits, a progressive rise in FP was observed without an increase in TMP and with an increasing trend in effluent pressure. Circuit lifespan was between 2 and 90 h. In 11% (n = 17) of the cases, the blood could not be returned to the patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings allowed the creation of graphs that indicate the appropriate point to return blood to the patient. FP was a major determinant in this decision; in most cases, TMP was not a reliable parameter. Our findings are applicable to convective, diffusive, and mixed treatments as well as both types of membranes used in this acute setting.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>This study provides two clear reference graphs showing risk scales for the assessment of circuit pressures in CRRT. The graphs proposed here can be used to evaluate any machine on the market and the two types of membranes used in this acute setting. Both convective and diffusive circuits can be assessed, allowing safer evaluation in patients who change treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), circuit coagulation is an important event that can result in suboptimal outcomes. Nurses must remain alert throughout the treatment and observe machine pressures. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) is commonly used for monitoring but it is sometimes too late to return blood to the patient.

Aim: To compare the capacity of prefilter pressure (FP) versus TMP to predict the risk of circuit coagulation in adult patients with acute renal failure on CRRT.

Study design: An observational, longitudinal, prospective study. This study was carried out in a tertiary referral hospital over 2 years. Data collected included the following variables: TMP, filter or FP, effluent pressure, venous and arterial pressure, filtration fraction, and ultrafiltration constant of each circuit. Means and their trends over time were collected, for both diffusive and convective therapy and for two membrane types.

Results: A total of 151 circuits (24 polysulfone and 127 acrylonitrile) were analysed, from 71 patients (n = 22 [34%] women; mean age, 66.5 [36-84] years). Of the total treatments, 80 were diffusive, and the rest were convective or mixed. In the diffusive circuits, a progressive rise in FP was observed without an increase in TMP and with an increasing trend in effluent pressure. Circuit lifespan was between 2 and 90 h. In 11% (n = 17) of the cases, the blood could not be returned to the patient.

Conclusion: These findings allowed the creation of graphs that indicate the appropriate point to return blood to the patient. FP was a major determinant in this decision; in most cases, TMP was not a reliable parameter. Our findings are applicable to convective, diffusive, and mixed treatments as well as both types of membranes used in this acute setting.

Relevance to clinical practice: This study provides two clear reference graphs showing risk scales for the assessment of circuit pressures in CRRT. The graphs proposed here can be used to evaluate any machine on the market and the two types of membranes used in this acute setting. Both convective and diffusive circuits can be assessed, allowing safer evaluation in patients who change treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预滤器压力的变化是决定持续肾脏替代疗法中回输血液的关键因素:一项观察性研究。
背景:在连续性肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)期间,回路凝血是一个重要事件,可能会导致不理想的治疗效果。护士必须在整个治疗过程中保持警惕并观察机器压力。目的:比较预滤器压力(FP)和 TMP 预测接受 CRRT 治疗的急性肾衰竭成人患者发生回路凝血风险的能力:研究设计:观察性、纵向、前瞻性研究。该研究在一家三级转诊医院进行,历时两年。收集的数据包括以下变量TMP、过滤器或 FP、流出压、静脉压和动脉压、滤过分数以及每个回路的超滤常数。收集了扩散疗法和对流疗法以及两种膜类型的平均值及其随时间变化的趋势:共分析了 71 名患者(女性 22 人 [34%];平均年龄 66.5 [36-84] 岁)的 151 个回路(24 个聚砜回路和 127 个丙烯腈回路)。在所有治疗方法中,80 种为扩散式,其余为对流式或混合式。在扩散回路中,观察到 FP 逐步上升,而 TMP 没有增加,流出压力呈上升趋势。在 11% 的病例(n = 17)中,血液无法返回患者体内:这些发现有助于绘制图表,指出将血液送回患者体内的适当时间点。在大多数情况下,TMP 并不是一个可靠的参数。我们的研究结果适用于对流、扩散和混合治疗,以及在这种急性环境下使用的两种膜:本研究提供了两个清晰的参考图表,显示了评估 CRRT 循环压力的风险等级。这里提出的图表可用于评估市场上的任何机器以及在这种急性环境下使用的两种膜。对流回路和扩散回路均可进行评估,从而可对更换治疗方法的患者进行更安全的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions to support the cognitive rehabilitation of patients admitted to the intensive care unit: An umbrella review. Safe and effective pressure of endotracheal tube suctioning based on sputum viscosity grades during artificial airway open suctioning procedures: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Clotted blood samples in the neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study to evaluate interventions to reduce blood sample clotting. Prediction of mortality in ICU patients: A comparison between the SOFA score and other indicators. Change in prefilter pressure as a key determinant in the decision to return blood in continuous renal replacement therapy: An observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1