Ultra-processed foods: Processing versus formulation.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-26 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.657
Allen S Levine, Job Ubbink
{"title":"Ultra-processed foods: Processing versus formulation.","authors":"Allen S Levine, Job Ubbink","doi":"10.1002/osp4.657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The four-tiered NOVA food classification defines foods based on their degree of processing and ranges from native unprocessed foods to so-called \"ultra-processed\" foods. Recent publications have suggested that foods classified as ultra-processed are unhealthy and contribute to the obesity epidemic. It is important to distinguish between formulation and processing of a food. In most cases it is the formulation more than the processing that results in foods that are not recommended as part of a healthy diet. Such \"ultra-formulated\" foods are unhealthy because they are high in added sugar and other caloric sweeteners, refined flours saturated fats and salt to increase palatability. The understanding that processing and formulation are distinct will assist health professionals in identifying the types of foods that are unhealthy and contribute to overconsumption and obesity. It furthermore will help to destigmatize food technology and promote discussions amongst health professionals, food scientists, corporate scientists, government officials and the general public. Novel food processing techniques are urgently needed in times of population growth, climate change and war-induced food shortages.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/73/34/OSP4-9-435.PMC10399516.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The four-tiered NOVA food classification defines foods based on their degree of processing and ranges from native unprocessed foods to so-called "ultra-processed" foods. Recent publications have suggested that foods classified as ultra-processed are unhealthy and contribute to the obesity epidemic. It is important to distinguish between formulation and processing of a food. In most cases it is the formulation more than the processing that results in foods that are not recommended as part of a healthy diet. Such "ultra-formulated" foods are unhealthy because they are high in added sugar and other caloric sweeteners, refined flours saturated fats and salt to increase palatability. The understanding that processing and formulation are distinct will assist health professionals in identifying the types of foods that are unhealthy and contribute to overconsumption and obesity. It furthermore will help to destigmatize food technology and promote discussions amongst health professionals, food scientists, corporate scientists, government officials and the general public. Novel food processing techniques are urgently needed in times of population growth, climate change and war-induced food shortages.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超加工食品:加工与配方。
诺瓦食品四级分类法根据食品的加工程度来定义食品,从原生未加工食品到所谓的 "超加工 "食品。最近的出版物表明,被归类为 "超加工 "食品的食品是不健康的,会导致肥胖症的流行。必须区分食品的配制和加工。在大多数情况下,配方比加工更容易导致食品不被推荐为健康饮食的一部分。这种 "超配方 "食品是不健康的,因为它们添加了大量的糖和其他热量甜味剂、精制面粉、饱和脂肪和盐,以增加可口性。认识到加工和配制是截然不同的,将有助于卫生专业人员识别哪些类型的食品不健康并导致过度消费和肥胖。此外,它还有助于消除食品技术的污名化,促进卫生专业人员、食品科学家、企业科学家、政府官员和公众之间的讨论。在人口增长、气候变化和战争导致粮食短缺的时代,迫切需要新的食品加工技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome. Optimizing muscle preservation during weight loss in patients with cirrhosis: A pilot study comparing continuous energy restriction to alternate-day modified fasting for weight loss in patients with obesity and non-alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver. Patient, facility, and environmental factors associated with obesity treatment in US Veterans. Metabolic obesity phenotypes and thyroid cancer risk: A systematic exploration of the evidence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1