Evaluating Firefighter On-Scene Decontamination Practices Using a National Fire Records Management System.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-03 DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002927
Antonio R Fernandez, Alison Treichel, J Brent Myers, Scott S Bourn, Remle P Crowe, Bill Gardner
{"title":"Evaluating Firefighter On-Scene Decontamination Practices Using a National Fire Records Management System.","authors":"Antonio R Fernandez, Alison Treichel, J Brent Myers, Scott S Bourn, Remle P Crowe, Bill Gardner","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000002927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes firefighters' on-scene decontamination procedure use post-working fire and frequency of adherence to best practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis of working fires was conducted using records from the ESO Data Collaborative (Austin, TX) national research database from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Documentation of decontamination procedures was examined among records with smoke or combustion products exposure. Firefighter and incident characteristics were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and univariable odds ratios were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 31,281 firefighters included in the study, 8.0% documented a fire-related exposure. Of those, 82% performed at least one on-scene decontamination procedure; 5% documented all decontamination procedures defined as best practices. The odds of documenting any decontamination procedure were significantly decreased among firefighters responding to incidents in rural areas compared with urban areas (odds ratio, 0.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fire personnel may not be taking all necessary decontamination steps post-working fires.</p>","PeriodicalId":16631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"931-936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10662600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002927","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study describes firefighters' on-scene decontamination procedure use post-working fire and frequency of adherence to best practice.

Methods: This retrospective analysis of working fires was conducted using records from the ESO Data Collaborative (Austin, TX) national research database from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021. Documentation of decontamination procedures was examined among records with smoke or combustion products exposure. Firefighter and incident characteristics were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and univariable odds ratios were calculated.

Results: Among the 31,281 firefighters included in the study, 8.0% documented a fire-related exposure. Of those, 82% performed at least one on-scene decontamination procedure; 5% documented all decontamination procedures defined as best practices. The odds of documenting any decontamination procedure were significantly decreased among firefighters responding to incidents in rural areas compared with urban areas (odds ratio, 0.70).

Conclusions: Fire personnel may not be taking all necessary decontamination steps post-working fires.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用国家消防记录管理系统评估消防员现场去污实践。
目的:本研究描述了消防员使用工作后消防的现场去污程序以及遵守最佳实践的频率。方法:使用ESO数据合作组织(德克萨斯州奥斯汀)国家研究数据库2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日的记录,对工作火灾进行回顾性分析。在烟雾或燃烧产物暴露的记录中检查了去污程序的文件。对消防员和事故特征进行了评估。计算描述性统计和单变量比值比。结果:在纳入研究的31281名消防员中,8.0%的人记录了与火灾有关的暴露。其中,82%的人至少进行了一次现场去污程序;5%记录了定义为最佳实践的所有去污程序。与城市地区相比,在农村地区应对事故的消防员中,记录任何去污程序的几率显著降低(比值比为0.70)。结论:消防人员可能没有在火灾后采取所有必要的去污步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
402
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an indispensable guide to good health in the workplace for physicians, nurses, and researchers alike. In-depth, clinically oriented research articles and technical reports keep occupational and environmental medicine specialists up-to-date on new medical developments in the prevention, diagnosis, and rehabilitation of environmentally induced conditions and work-related injuries and illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Proposed Framework for Developing and Evaluating Total Worker Health® Education and Training Programs. Long-term impairment from irritant-induced occupational asthma. Unmet Mental Health Needs Among California Workers Since the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Multilevel Mindfulness: Which organizational factors stimulate mindfulness in the workplace? The Influence of Emergency Call Volume on Occupational Workload and Sleep Quality in Urban Firefighters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1