The effect of rose oil aromatherapy and hand-holding on pain due to peripheral intravenous catheter insertion

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.explore.2023.06.002

Tulay Basak, Ayla Demirtas, Senem Duman

{"title":"The effect of rose oil aromatherapy and hand-holding on pain due to peripheral intravenous catheter insertion","authors":"Tulay Basak, Ayla Demirtas, Senem Duman","doi":"10.1016/j.explore.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rose oil (Rosa Damascene Mill.) aromatherapy and hand-holding in reducing pain associated with peripheral intravenous catheter insertion.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comparative mixed-method design. A total of 126 patients were included in the study. For the study's quantitative data, sociodemographic characteristics of the patients and the Patient Interview Form for the qualitative data of the Numeric Rating Scale were used. In all patients included in the study, PIVC insertion was performed a single time by the same nurse using a standard procedure. Chi-square and Bonferroni tests were used for comparative statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, gender, marital status, BMI, and education level (p>0.05). Pain scores: it was 2.40±1.78 in the rose oil group, 3.53±1.98 in the hand-holding group, and 4.88±1.56 in the control group. The difference between the groups regarding pain scores is statistically significant (p=0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The study determined that rose oil aromatherapy and hand-holding interventions reduce pain during PIVC. However, rose oil aromatherapy was more effective on pain than the hand-holding intervention.</p><p>(Clinical Trial ID: NCT05425849)</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50459,"journal":{"name":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550830723001222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rose oil (Rosa Damascene Mill.) aromatherapy and hand-holding in reducing pain associated with peripheral intravenous catheter insertion.

Methods

A comparative mixed-method design. A total of 126 patients were included in the study. For the study's quantitative data, sociodemographic characteristics of the patients and the Patient Interview Form for the qualitative data of the Numeric Rating Scale were used. In all patients included in the study, PIVC insertion was performed a single time by the same nurse using a standard procedure. Chi-square and Bonferroni tests were used for comparative statistics.

Results

No statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, gender, marital status, BMI, and education level (p>0.05). Pain scores: it was 2.40±1.78 in the rose oil group, 3.53±1.98 in the hand-holding group, and 4.88±1.56 in the control group. The difference between the groups regarding pain scores is statistically significant (p=0.001).

Conclusions

The study determined that rose oil aromatherapy and hand-holding interventions reduce pain during PIVC. However, rose oil aromatherapy was more effective on pain than the hand-holding intervention.

(Clinical Trial ID: NCT05425849)

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

玫瑰精油芳香疗法和手部护理对外周静脉导管插入引起的疼痛的影响。

简介：该研究旨在评估玫瑰精油（Rosa Damascene Mill：本研究旨在评估玫瑰精油（Rosa Damascene Mill.）芳香疗法和手部护理对减轻外周静脉导管插入时疼痛的效果：方法：混合方法比较设计。研究共纳入了 126 名患者。在研究的定量数据中，使用了患者的社会人口学特征，在定性数据中，使用了《患者访谈表》中的数字评分量表。所有纳入研究的患者均由同一名护士按照标准程序一次性插入 PIVC。比较统计采用了卡方检验和Bonferroni检验：两组患者在年龄、性别、婚姻状况、体重指数和受教育程度方面差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。疼痛评分：玫瑰精油组为（2.40±1.78）分，手握组为（3.53±1.98）分，对照组为（4.88±1.56）分。组间疼痛评分差异有统计学意义（P=0.001）：研究结果表明，玫瑰精油芳香疗法和手拉手干预可以减轻 PIVC 期间的疼痛。然而，玫瑰精油芳香疗法比手握干预对疼痛更有效。(临床试验编号：NCT05425849）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Explore-The Journal of Science and Healing 医学-全科医学与补充医学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

8.30%

发文量

179

审稿时长

25 days

期刊介绍： EXPLORE: The Journal of Science & Healing addresses the scientific principles behind, and applications of, evidence-based healing practices from a wide variety of sources, including conventional, alternative, and cross-cultural medicine. It is an interdisciplinary journal that explores the healing arts, consciousness, spirituality, eco-environmental issues, and basic science as all these fields relate to health.