Carol S North, Samina Mahesar, Karen J Meltzer, David E Pollio
{"title":"Characteristics and experiences of professionals providing 9/11 mental health services.","authors":"Carol S North, Samina Mahesar, Karen J Meltzer, David E Pollio","doi":"10.12788/acp.0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After disasters, mental health professionals might be called upon to help address the emotional consequences of the disaster among survivors and other affected groups, but the clinicians themselves could be affected. This exploratory study examined the experiences of 60 mental health professionals, most of whom provided mental health care to individuals affected by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (9/11), and/or experienced 9/11 sequelae themselves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants completed structured interviews 3 and/or 6 years after the disaster, with full diagnostic assessment of psychiatric disorders and questions specific to their personal and professional post-9/11 experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providing postdisaster care was somewhat stressful initially, but long-term effects were more positive than negative, with overall benefit to many personal lives. Most found their clients' 9/11 stories emotionally upsetting, yet characterized their 9/11 mental health work as positive. Work satisfaction increased by 3-fold, but this effect was transitory. One-third had postdisaster psychopathology, but most was pre-existing and therefore not a product of disaster-related stressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although most mental health professionals initially found the emotional difficulty of their work increased after 9/11, this negative effect had largely dissipated over the years. Opportunities for disaster mental health training and initial logistical support could benefit these professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50770,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"35 3","pages":"178-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: After disasters, mental health professionals might be called upon to help address the emotional consequences of the disaster among survivors and other affected groups, but the clinicians themselves could be affected. This exploratory study examined the experiences of 60 mental health professionals, most of whom provided mental health care to individuals affected by the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (9/11), and/or experienced 9/11 sequelae themselves.
Methods: Participants completed structured interviews 3 and/or 6 years after the disaster, with full diagnostic assessment of psychiatric disorders and questions specific to their personal and professional post-9/11 experience.
Results: Providing postdisaster care was somewhat stressful initially, but long-term effects were more positive than negative, with overall benefit to many personal lives. Most found their clients' 9/11 stories emotionally upsetting, yet characterized their 9/11 mental health work as positive. Work satisfaction increased by 3-fold, but this effect was transitory. One-third had postdisaster psychopathology, but most was pre-existing and therefore not a product of disaster-related stressors.
Conclusions: Although most mental health professionals initially found the emotional difficulty of their work increased after 9/11, this negative effect had largely dissipated over the years. Opportunities for disaster mental health training and initial logistical support could benefit these professionals.
期刊介绍:
The ANNALS publishes up-to-date information regarding the diagnosis and /or treatment of persons with mental disorders. Preferred manuscripts are those that report the results of controlled clinical trials, timely and thorough evidence-based reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports that present new appraisals of pertinent clinical topics.