HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR estimation based on glycated hemoglobin as an alternative for fasting glucose.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2022.2160889
Joris R Delanghe, Evelyn Verlinde, Marijn M Speeckaert, Thomas Maenhout
{"title":"HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR estimation based on glycated hemoglobin as an alternative for fasting glucose.","authors":"Joris R Delanghe,&nbsp;Evelyn Verlinde,&nbsp;Marijn M Speeckaert,&nbsp;Thomas Maenhout","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2022.2160889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health problem. Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is a key laboratory index in the assessment of insulin resistance. The calculation of HOMA-IR and its updated version HOMA2-IR are partly based on plasma glucose determinations, which are prone to important pre-analytical errors. As glycated hemoglobin (Hb) fractions strongly correlate with fasting glucose levels and are more stable analytes, we explored the possibilities of using glycated Hb fractions for calculating HOMA-IR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Labile Hb and HbA<sub>1c</sub> fractions were simultaneously assayed on a Tosoh G8 analyzer and expressed as %. Fasting glucose was measured in fluoride plasma using a hexokinase method. A Lumipulse G1200 luminescence immunoassay was used to measure serum insulin. The HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR values were compared to corresponding indices calculated using glucose and glycated Hb fractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Labile Hb could be measured with between-run CVs of 2.2-2.3%. Labile Hb correlated with both glycemia (r = 0.80) and HbA<sub>1c</sub> results (r = 0.73). HbA1c-derived estimated average glucose (eAG)-based HOMA calculation correlated very well with HOMA-IR (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.9972). Based on eAG calculations, HOMA2-IR (%B, %S, and IR) gave comparable results, as compared to labile Hb-based calculations, in particular for fasting plasma glucose values between 4.44 and 6.67 mmol/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HbA1c and eAG are practical alternatives for glucose for estimating HOMA-IR. The use of glycated Hb enables home sampling for HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR calculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2022.2160889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major global public health problem. Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is a key laboratory index in the assessment of insulin resistance. The calculation of HOMA-IR and its updated version HOMA2-IR are partly based on plasma glucose determinations, which are prone to important pre-analytical errors. As glycated hemoglobin (Hb) fractions strongly correlate with fasting glucose levels and are more stable analytes, we explored the possibilities of using glycated Hb fractions for calculating HOMA-IR.

Methods: Labile Hb and HbA1c fractions were simultaneously assayed on a Tosoh G8 analyzer and expressed as %. Fasting glucose was measured in fluoride plasma using a hexokinase method. A Lumipulse G1200 luminescence immunoassay was used to measure serum insulin. The HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR values were compared to corresponding indices calculated using glucose and glycated Hb fractions.

Results: Labile Hb could be measured with between-run CVs of 2.2-2.3%. Labile Hb correlated with both glycemia (r = 0.80) and HbA1c results (r = 0.73). HbA1c-derived estimated average glucose (eAG)-based HOMA calculation correlated very well with HOMA-IR (r2 = 0.9972). Based on eAG calculations, HOMA2-IR (%B, %S, and IR) gave comparable results, as compared to labile Hb-based calculations, in particular for fasting plasma glucose values between 4.44 and 6.67 mmol/L.

Conclusions: HbA1c and eAG are practical alternatives for glucose for estimating HOMA-IR. The use of glycated Hb enables home sampling for HOMA-IR and HOMA2-IR calculation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于糖化血红蛋白的HOMA-IR和HOMA-IR估计可替代空腹血糖。
背景:糖尿病是一个重大的全球性公共卫生问题。胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)是评估胰岛素抵抗的关键实验室指标。HOMA-IR及其更新版本HOMA2-IR的计算部分基于血浆葡萄糖测定,这容易产生重要的分析前误差。由于糖化血红蛋白(Hb)分数与空腹血糖水平密切相关,并且是更稳定的分析物,我们探索了使用糖化血红蛋白分数计算HOMA-IR的可能性。方法:在Tosoh G8分析仪上同时检测不稳定Hb和HbA1c,并用%表示。用己糖激酶法测定氟血浆空腹血糖。采用Lumipulse G1200荧光免疫分析法测定血清胰岛素。将HOMA-IR和HOMA2-IR值与使用葡萄糖和糖化Hb分数计算的相应指数进行比较。结果:可测定不稳定Hb,运行间CVs为2.2-2.3%。不稳定Hb与血糖(r = 0.80)和HbA1c结果(r = 0.73)均相关。基于hba1c的估计平均葡萄糖(eAG)的HOMA计算与HOMA- ir非常相关(r2 = 0.9972)。基于eAG计算,homo2 -IR (%B, %S和IR)与不稳定的基于hb的计算结果相当,特别是空腹血糖值在4.44和6.67 mmol/L之间。结论:HbA1c和eAG是评估HOMA-IR的实际替代葡萄糖。糖化Hb的使用使HOMA-IR和HOMA2-IR计算的家庭采样成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing hospital emergency response based on the experience of COVID-19. Herpes zoster in Belgium: a new solution to an old problem. Appropriate use of antibiotics for oral/dental conditions in older adults: a narrative review. Systemic sarcoidosis presenting with hypercalcemia, sinusitis and hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. Comparison of time-to-detection of Mindray TDR and BacT/ALERT®3D blood culture systems using simulated blood cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1