From industrial to digital citizenship: rethinking social rights in cyberspace.

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Theory and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s11186-022-09480-6
Federico Tomasello
{"title":"From industrial to digital citizenship: rethinking social rights in cyberspace.","authors":"Federico Tomasello","doi":"10.1007/s11186-022-09480-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing social inequalities represent a major concern associated with the Digital Revolution. The article tackles this issue by exploring how welfare regulations and redistribution policies can be rethought in the age of digital capitalism. It focuses on the history and enduring crisis of social citizenship rights in their connection with technological changes, in order to draw a comparison between the industrial and the digital scenario. The first section addresses the link between the Industrial Revolution and the genesis of social rights. It describes the latter as a legal 'machine' designed to offset the imbalances produced by the technological movement of industrialization. The second and third sections introduce the notion of 'industrial citizenship' to describe the architecture of social rights in mature industrial societies and to contend that European systems of welfare are still largely modeled on an industrial standard. The fourth part investigates the impact of the Digital Revolution on this model of social citizenship. It identifies debates on basic income as a major trajectory for redesigning welfare regulations in a post-industrial era, and the digital user as a crucial emerging subject of rights. The final part explores how digital users could be entitled to social rights as data suppliers. To this end, it introduces the idea of 'digital-social rights' resulting from the incorporation of welfare and redistribution principles into emerging digital rights. Hence, it proposes a legal-political framework for the redistribution of the revenues generated by data in the form of a 'digital basic income' for citizens of cyberspace.</p>","PeriodicalId":48137,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Society","volume":"52 3","pages":"463-486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163854/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09480-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Growing social inequalities represent a major concern associated with the Digital Revolution. The article tackles this issue by exploring how welfare regulations and redistribution policies can be rethought in the age of digital capitalism. It focuses on the history and enduring crisis of social citizenship rights in their connection with technological changes, in order to draw a comparison between the industrial and the digital scenario. The first section addresses the link between the Industrial Revolution and the genesis of social rights. It describes the latter as a legal 'machine' designed to offset the imbalances produced by the technological movement of industrialization. The second and third sections introduce the notion of 'industrial citizenship' to describe the architecture of social rights in mature industrial societies and to contend that European systems of welfare are still largely modeled on an industrial standard. The fourth part investigates the impact of the Digital Revolution on this model of social citizenship. It identifies debates on basic income as a major trajectory for redesigning welfare regulations in a post-industrial era, and the digital user as a crucial emerging subject of rights. The final part explores how digital users could be entitled to social rights as data suppliers. To this end, it introduces the idea of 'digital-social rights' resulting from the incorporation of welfare and redistribution principles into emerging digital rights. Hence, it proposes a legal-political framework for the redistribution of the revenues generated by data in the form of a 'digital basic income' for citizens of cyberspace.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从工业公民到数字公民:重新思考网络空间中的社会权利。
日益严重的社会不平等是与数字革命相关的一个主要问题。本文通过探讨在数字资本主义时代如何重新思考福利法规和再分配政策来解决这个问题。它关注社会公民权利与技术变革的历史和持久危机,以便在工业和数字场景之间进行比较。第一节论述了工业革命与社会权利起源之间的联系。它将后者描述为一种法律“机器”,旨在抵消工业化技术运动产生的不平衡。第二节和第三节介绍了“工业公民”的概念,以描述成熟工业社会的社会权利结构,并认为欧洲的福利制度在很大程度上仍然是以工业标准为模型的。第四部分考察了数字革命对这种社会公民模式的影响。它将关于基本收入的辩论确定为后工业时代重新设计福利法规的主要轨迹,并将数字用户确定为一个重要的新兴权利主体。最后一部分探讨了数字用户作为数据供应商如何享有社会权利。为此,它引入了“数字社会权利”的概念,这是将福利和再分配原则纳入新兴数字权利的结果。因此,它提出了一个法律-政治框架,以网络空间公民的“数字基本收入”的形式重新分配数据产生的收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Society
Theory and Society SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Theory and Society is a forum for the international community of scholars that publishes theoretically-informed analyses of social processes. It opens its pages to authors working at the frontiers of social analysis, regardless of discipline. Its subject matter ranges from prehistory to contemporary affairs, from treatments of single individuals and national societies to world culture, from discussions of theory to methodological critique, from First World to Third World - but always in the effort to bring together theory, criticism and concrete observation.
期刊最新文献
Dating in captivity: creativity, digital affordance, and the organization of interaction in online dating during quarantine The theory and function of Marxian water rent in the United States Correction to: Reimagining modern politics in the European mountains: confronting the traditional commons with the neo‑rural conception of the common good What counts as investment? Productive and unproductive expenditures The gates to the profession are open: the alternative institutionalization of data science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1