Reducing Postoperative Length of Stay for Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients using Quality Improvement Methodology.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000672
Crystal Seilhamer, Kelly Miller, Jessica Holstine
{"title":"Reducing Postoperative Length of Stay for Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients using Quality Improvement Methodology.","authors":"Crystal Seilhamer,&nbsp;Kelly Miller,&nbsp;Jessica Holstine","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 1%-3% of the US population is diagnosed with scoliosis. In addition, 80% of those diagnosed have idiopathic scoliosis, with about 10% requiring surgical intervention. This Quality Improvement initiative aimed to reduce the length of stay (LOS) after posterior spinal fusion for these patients. According to the Pediatric Health Information System, our institution had a poorer performance, with an actual LOS greater than or equal to the expected LOS compared with peer institutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim was to increase the percentage of idiopathic scoliosis patients with a procedure to discharge LOS of less than or equal to 4 days after posterior spinal fusion from 39.13% to 90%. Interventions included implementing a new pain management protocol, a daily checklist, education on expectations of postoperative pain, and updated order sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interventions improved patients discharged in less than 4 days from 39.13% to 93.48% (<i>P ≤</i> 0.001), reducing the average postprocedure LOS from 4.93 to 2.59 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001) days. A key process measure tracked was the percentage of patients off the patient-control analgesia pump by postoperative day 2, which increased from 13% to 97.75% (<i>P ≤</i> 0.001). These improvements did not affect the balancing measure of readmissions or Emergency Department visits for pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By implementing a more standardized pathway, including a patient-focused daily checklist for providers and families, we established expectations for LOS and pain. This checklist and updates to the pain management protocol successfully reduced the length of stay in idiopathic scoliosis patients after posterior spinal fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/8e/pqs-8-e672.PMC10403041.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximately 1%-3% of the US population is diagnosed with scoliosis. In addition, 80% of those diagnosed have idiopathic scoliosis, with about 10% requiring surgical intervention. This Quality Improvement initiative aimed to reduce the length of stay (LOS) after posterior spinal fusion for these patients. According to the Pediatric Health Information System, our institution had a poorer performance, with an actual LOS greater than or equal to the expected LOS compared with peer institutions.

Methods: The aim was to increase the percentage of idiopathic scoliosis patients with a procedure to discharge LOS of less than or equal to 4 days after posterior spinal fusion from 39.13% to 90%. Interventions included implementing a new pain management protocol, a daily checklist, education on expectations of postoperative pain, and updated order sets.

Results: Interventions improved patients discharged in less than 4 days from 39.13% to 93.48% (P ≤ 0.001), reducing the average postprocedure LOS from 4.93 to 2.59 (P ≤ 0.001) days. A key process measure tracked was the percentage of patients off the patient-control analgesia pump by postoperative day 2, which increased from 13% to 97.75% (P ≤ 0.001). These improvements did not affect the balancing measure of readmissions or Emergency Department visits for pain.

Conclusions: By implementing a more standardized pathway, including a patient-focused daily checklist for providers and families, we established expectations for LOS and pain. This checklist and updates to the pain management protocol successfully reduced the length of stay in idiopathic scoliosis patients after posterior spinal fusion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用质量改进方法减少特发性脊柱侧凸患者术后住院时间。
大约1%-3%的美国人被诊断患有脊柱侧凸。此外,80%被诊断为特发性脊柱侧凸,约10%需要手术干预。这项质量改进计划旨在减少这些患者后路脊柱融合后的住院时间(LOS)。根据儿科健康信息系统,我们的机构表现较差,与同行机构相比,实际LOS大于或等于预期LOS。方法:目的是增加特发性脊柱侧凸患者在后路脊柱融合术后少于或等于4天解除LOS的比例,从39.13%增加到90%。干预措施包括实施新的疼痛管理方案、每日检查表、关于术后疼痛预期的教育和更新的医嘱集。结果:干预措施使4天内出院的患者从39.13%减少到93.48% (P≤0.001),使平均术后LOS从4.93天减少到2.59天(P≤0.001)。跟踪的一个关键过程测量是术后第2天停用患者自控镇痛泵的患者百分比,从13%增加到97.75% (P≤0.001)。这些改善不影响再入院或因疼痛就诊的平衡措施。结论:通过实施更标准化的途径,包括为提供者和家庭提供以患者为中心的每日检查表,我们建立了对LOS和疼痛的期望。这份检查表和疼痛管理方案的更新成功地减少了特发性脊柱侧凸患者后路脊柱融合术后的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Safety: Needs Assessment and Informed Curriculum at an Academic Children's Hospital. Implementing Screening for Neonatal Delirium in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Is Neonatal Delirium Ready for Prime Time Quality Improvement? Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Low-risk Children with Solid Tumors: A Quality Improvement Initiative. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1