Could Fixed Implants Be a Viable Treatment Option in Disabled Patients? A Clinical Retrospective Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.11607/jomi.9880
Soo-Yeon Yoo, Seong-Kyun Kim, Seong-Joo Heo, Jai-Young Koak, Kwang-Suk Seo
{"title":"Could Fixed Implants Be a Viable Treatment Option in Disabled Patients? A Clinical Retrospective Study.","authors":"Soo-Yeon Yoo, Seong-Kyun Kim, Seong-Joo Heo, Jai-Young Koak, Kwang-Suk Seo","doi":"10.11607/jomi.9880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify the survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants in patients with different disability types.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed in a total of 189 implants for fixed implant prostheses in 72 patients. Data were collected on loaded implants at least 1 year in function, and the mean observation time was 37.3 months. Implant survival was examined, and MBL was observed around the implants of two groups (mental disability vs physical disability) based on age, sex, implant location (anterior vs posterior), and prosthetic connection (internal vs external).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 189 implants, 4 failed; the total implant survival rate was 97.8% across a mean of 37.3 months. The cumulative survival rate at 85 months in a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was 94.3% ± 3% in patients with mental disability and 50% ± 35.4% in patients with physical disability, which was a statistically significant difference between the disability groups (<i>P</i> = .006). Fisher exact test showed significant differences in MBL only with age (<i>P</i> < .001). The implant MBL by disability type-adjusted for age and observation period-showed significant differences in multiple linear regression analyses (<i>P</i> = .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implant survival rates in patients with disability were in line with those reported for nondisabled patients. The MBL of the implants was within the physiologic bone loss after implant loading. Implants in patients with mental disability showed higher cumulative survival rates than in patients with physical disability, but also a higher amount of MBL. Within the limitations of this study, dental implants for patients with disability are viable. These results can establish future implant treatment plans for this population. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:562-568. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9880.</p>","PeriodicalId":50298,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9880","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To verify the survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants in patients with different disability types.

Materials and methods: Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed in a total of 189 implants for fixed implant prostheses in 72 patients. Data were collected on loaded implants at least 1 year in function, and the mean observation time was 37.3 months. Implant survival was examined, and MBL was observed around the implants of two groups (mental disability vs physical disability) based on age, sex, implant location (anterior vs posterior), and prosthetic connection (internal vs external).

Results: Of the 189 implants, 4 failed; the total implant survival rate was 97.8% across a mean of 37.3 months. The cumulative survival rate at 85 months in a Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was 94.3% ± 3% in patients with mental disability and 50% ± 35.4% in patients with physical disability, which was a statistically significant difference between the disability groups (P = .006). Fisher exact test showed significant differences in MBL only with age (P < .001). The implant MBL by disability type-adjusted for age and observation period-showed significant differences in multiple linear regression analyses (P = .003).

Conclusion: The implant survival rates in patients with disability were in line with those reported for nondisabled patients. The MBL of the implants was within the physiologic bone loss after implant loading. Implants in patients with mental disability showed higher cumulative survival rates than in patients with physical disability, but also a higher amount of MBL. Within the limitations of this study, dental implants for patients with disability are viable. These results can establish future implant treatment plans for this population. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:562-568. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9880.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
固定植入物能成为残疾患者可行的治疗选择吗?一项临床回顾性研究。
目的:验证不同残疾类型患者植入物的存活率和边缘骨丢失(MBL)。材料和方法:对72名患者的189个固定植入假体植入物进行临床和放射学评估。数据收集了功能至少1年的负载植入物,平均观察时间为37.3个月。根据年龄、性别、植入位置(前部与后部)和假体连接(内部与外部),检查植入物的存活率,并在两组(精神残疾与身体残疾)的植入物周围观察MBL。结果:189个植入物中,4个失败;在平均37.3个月内,总植入物存活率为97.8%。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析显示,精神残疾患者85个月时的累计生存率为94.3%±3%,这在残疾组之间具有统计学意义(P=.006)。Fisher精确检验显示MBL仅随年龄而有显著差异(P<.001)。根据年龄和观察期调整的残疾类型的植入物MBL在多元线性回归分析中显示出显著差异(P=.003)。结论:残疾患者的植入物生存率与非残疾患者的报告一致。植入物的MBL在植入物加载后的生理性骨丢失范围内。精神残疾患者的植入物显示出比身体残疾患者更高的累积生存率,但MBL含量也更高。在这项研究的限制范围内,为残疾患者植入牙齿是可行的。这些结果可以为该人群制定未来的植入治疗计划。Int J口腔颌面种植体2023;38:562-568。doi:10.11607/jomi.9880。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Edited by Steven E. Eckert, DDS, MS ISSN (Print): 0882-2786 ISSN (Online): 1942-4434 This highly regarded, often-cited journal integrates clinical and scientific data to improve methods and results of oral and maxillofacial implant therapy. It presents pioneering research, technology, clinical applications, reviews of the literature, seminal studies, emerging technology, position papers, and consensus studies, as well as the many clinical and therapeutic innovations that ensue as a result of these efforts. The editorial board is composed of recognized opinion leaders in their respective areas of expertise and reflects the international reach of the journal. Under their leadership, JOMI maintains its strong scientific integrity while expanding its influence within the field of implant dentistry. JOMI’s popular regular feature "Thematic Abstract Review" presents a review of abstracts of recently published articles on a specific topical area of interest each issue.
期刊最新文献
Peri-implant Parameters of Dental Implants Inserted in Prefabricated Microvascular Fibular Flaps: A Retrospective Study. Different Surgical Techniques in the All-on-4 Treatment Concept: Evaluation of the Stress Distribution Created in Implant and Peripheral Bone with Finite Element Analysis. Augmentation of Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa Using a Combination of Free Gingival Graft Strip with Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix or Free Gingival Graft Alone: A Randomized Controlled Study. Efficacy of Labial Split-Thickness Eversion Periosteoplasty for Soft Tissue Management in Posterior Mandibular Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Procedures: A Prospective Clinical Study. Porcine Resorbable Collagen Matrix Shows Good Incorporation of Liquid Platelet-Rich Fibrin In Vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1