The role of hopelessness and procedural justice on depressogenic outcomes in serious adolescent offenders.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law and Human Behavior Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1037/lhb0000502
Morgan Stutts, Joseph R Cohen
{"title":"The role of hopelessness and procedural justice on depressogenic outcomes in serious adolescent offenders.","authors":"Morgan Stutts,&nbsp;Joseph R Cohen","doi":"10.1037/lhb0000502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite increasing depression and suicide rates in justice-system-involved youth, little is known about depressogenic risk factors in this population. Therefore, we explored how levels of and changes in hopelessness and perceptions of procedural justice predicted depressive and suicidal outcomes in justice-system-involved youth.</p><p><strong>Hypotheses: </strong>We hypothesized that higher levels and increasing trajectories of hopelessness, as well as of perceived injustice, would predict depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation across adolescence and emerging adulthood. We also expected that procedural injustice would explain the relation between hopelessness and these outcomes. Finally, we hypothesized that gender and race/ethnicity would moderate the influence of hopelessness and perceived injustice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data for the present study were collected as part of the Pathways to Desistance study. In total, 1,354 adolescents (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 16.04 years; 86.4% male; 41.4% non-Hispanic Black, 33.5% Hispanic, 20.2% non-Hispanic White) convicted of serious offenses participated. For the present study, participants answered questions on measures of procedural justice, hopelessness, depression, and suicidal ideation across 11 time points over 7 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using latent growth curve modeling, we found partial support for our hypotheses. Specifically, baseline levels of hopelessness predicted depression levels and increases in depression during adolescence (<i>ps</i> < .01). Further, changes in hopelessness predicted corresponding changes in depression throughout adolescence and emerging adulthood (ps < .001). Similarly, procedural justice levels predicted levels of depression (<i>p</i> < .001), and changes in procedural justice corresponded to changes in depression during emerging adulthood (<i>p</i> = .01). With regard to suicidal ideation, levels of and changes in hopelessness in emerging adulthood predicted corresponding suicidal ideation outcomes (ps ≤ .01). Meanwhile, we found only marginal support for our mediation model (<i>p</i> = .05). Collectively, results did not vary across gender or race/ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hopelessness and perceived injustice are unique predictors of depression for juvenile-justice-system-involved youth. Preventive interventions targeting both hopelessness and procedural justice could help attenuate elevated depression rates in this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48230,"journal":{"name":"Law and Human Behavior","volume":"46 6","pages":"415-428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Despite increasing depression and suicide rates in justice-system-involved youth, little is known about depressogenic risk factors in this population. Therefore, we explored how levels of and changes in hopelessness and perceptions of procedural justice predicted depressive and suicidal outcomes in justice-system-involved youth.

Hypotheses: We hypothesized that higher levels and increasing trajectories of hopelessness, as well as of perceived injustice, would predict depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation across adolescence and emerging adulthood. We also expected that procedural injustice would explain the relation between hopelessness and these outcomes. Finally, we hypothesized that gender and race/ethnicity would moderate the influence of hopelessness and perceived injustice.

Method: Data for the present study were collected as part of the Pathways to Desistance study. In total, 1,354 adolescents (Mage = 16.04 years; 86.4% male; 41.4% non-Hispanic Black, 33.5% Hispanic, 20.2% non-Hispanic White) convicted of serious offenses participated. For the present study, participants answered questions on measures of procedural justice, hopelessness, depression, and suicidal ideation across 11 time points over 7 years.

Results: Using latent growth curve modeling, we found partial support for our hypotheses. Specifically, baseline levels of hopelessness predicted depression levels and increases in depression during adolescence (ps < .01). Further, changes in hopelessness predicted corresponding changes in depression throughout adolescence and emerging adulthood (ps < .001). Similarly, procedural justice levels predicted levels of depression (p < .001), and changes in procedural justice corresponded to changes in depression during emerging adulthood (p = .01). With regard to suicidal ideation, levels of and changes in hopelessness in emerging adulthood predicted corresponding suicidal ideation outcomes (ps ≤ .01). Meanwhile, we found only marginal support for our mediation model (p = .05). Collectively, results did not vary across gender or race/ethnicity.

Conclusions: Hopelessness and perceived injustice are unique predictors of depression for juvenile-justice-system-involved youth. Preventive interventions targeting both hopelessness and procedural justice could help attenuate elevated depression rates in this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绝望感和程序正义在严重青少年罪犯致抑郁结果中的作用。
目的:尽管司法系统相关青年的抑郁和自杀率不断上升,但对这一人群中致抑郁风险因素知之甚少。因此,我们探讨了绝望和程序正义感知的水平和变化如何预测司法系统相关青年的抑郁和自杀结果。假设:我们假设,更高水平和不断增加的绝望轨迹,以及感知到的不公正,可以预测青春期和成年初期的抑郁症状和自杀念头。我们还期望程序上的不公正可以解释绝望和这些结果之间的关系。最后,我们假设性别和种族/民族会缓和绝望和感知不公正的影响。方法:本研究的数据是作为“停止途径”研究的一部分收集的。共1,354名青少年(年龄= 16.04岁;男性86.4%;41.4%的非西班牙裔黑人,33.5%的西班牙裔,20.2%的非西班牙裔白人被判犯有严重罪行。在本研究中,参与者在7年中跨越11个时间点回答了有关程序公正、绝望、抑郁和自杀意念的问题。结果:使用潜在增长曲线模型,我们发现部分支持我们的假设。具体来说,基线水平的绝望预测抑郁水平和青春期抑郁的增加(ps < 0.01)。此外,无望感的变化预测了整个青春期和成年初期抑郁的相应变化(ps < 0.001)。同样,程序公正水平预测抑郁水平(p < 0.001),程序公正的变化与成年初期抑郁的变化相对应(p = 0.01)。在自杀意念方面,初成年期绝望的水平和变化可预测相应的自杀意念结局(ps≤0.01)。同时,我们发现我们的中介模型只有边际支持(p = 0.05)。总体而言,结果没有因性别或种族/民族而异。结论:绝望和感知不公是参与少年司法系统的青少年抑郁的独特预测因素。针对绝望和程序正义的预防性干预可以帮助减轻这一人群中抑郁率的升高。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Law and Human Behavior, the official journal of the American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association, is a multidisciplinary forum for the publication of articles and discussions of issues arising out of the relationships between human behavior and the law, our legal system, and the legal process. This journal publishes original research, reviews of past research, and theoretical studies from professionals in criminal justice, law, psychology, sociology, psychiatry, political science, education, communication, and other areas germane to the field.
期刊最新文献
The Miranda penalty: Inferring guilt from suspects' silence. Comparing predictive validity of Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory scores in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Canadian youth. Regional gender bias and year predict gender representation on civil trial teams. Lived experiences of bias in compensation and reintegration associated with false admissions of guilt. The structured assessment of violence risk in youth demonstrates measurement invariance between Black and White justice-referred youths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1