Dental Hygiene Educators' Perspectives Towards Manikin Testing for Clinical Licensure Examination.

Cassandra A Penning, Leciel K Bono, JoAnn R Gurenlian
{"title":"Dental Hygiene Educators' Perspectives Towards Manikin Testing for Clinical Licensure Examination.","authors":"Cassandra A Penning,&nbsp;Leciel K Bono,&nbsp;JoAnn R Gurenlian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b> The use of manikin testing was recently introduced for dental hygiene licensure examinations. There is currently a lack of research about the efficacy and accuracy of manikin testing for clinical licensure. The purpose of this study is to identify perceptions of dental hygiene educators regarding the use of manikins for the dental hygiene clinical licensure exam.<b>Methods</b> This qualitative study used an exploratory, online, focus group design with 20 dental hygiene educator participants recruited through purposive sampling. Pseudonyms were used to protect participants confidentiality. Two groups of educators were from institutions that did not use manikin testing during COVID-19, and two groups of educators were from institutions that did use manikin testing during the same time period. Themes were analyzed using the classic analysis strategy. Validity was established using investigator triangulation, member checks, and saturation.<b>Results</b> Lack of knowledge including preconceived assumptions regarding manikin examinations; testing considerations with benefits and concerns regarding manikins versus live patients; and perceptions regarding the value of single point in time clinical licensure examinations were the three major themes identified by the participants.<b>Conclusion</b> The manikin exam appeared to address ethical concerns, however, there were limitations in relation to assessing critical thinking and decision-making skills. Some participants expressed that graduation from an accredited dental hygiene program was considered sufficient for licensure. Future studies should include comparisons of recent graduates who complete a clinical licensure examination versus those who do not complete a clinical licensure examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":52471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","volume":"97 4","pages":"46-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental hygiene : JDH / American Dental Hygienists'' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The use of manikin testing was recently introduced for dental hygiene licensure examinations. There is currently a lack of research about the efficacy and accuracy of manikin testing for clinical licensure. The purpose of this study is to identify perceptions of dental hygiene educators regarding the use of manikins for the dental hygiene clinical licensure exam.Methods This qualitative study used an exploratory, online, focus group design with 20 dental hygiene educator participants recruited through purposive sampling. Pseudonyms were used to protect participants confidentiality. Two groups of educators were from institutions that did not use manikin testing during COVID-19, and two groups of educators were from institutions that did use manikin testing during the same time period. Themes were analyzed using the classic analysis strategy. Validity was established using investigator triangulation, member checks, and saturation.Results Lack of knowledge including preconceived assumptions regarding manikin examinations; testing considerations with benefits and concerns regarding manikins versus live patients; and perceptions regarding the value of single point in time clinical licensure examinations were the three major themes identified by the participants.Conclusion The manikin exam appeared to address ethical concerns, however, there were limitations in relation to assessing critical thinking and decision-making skills. Some participants expressed that graduation from an accredited dental hygiene program was considered sufficient for licensure. Future studies should include comparisons of recent graduates who complete a clinical licensure examination versus those who do not complete a clinical licensure examination.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口腔卫生教育工作者对临床执照考试假人测试的看法。
目的在口腔卫生执照考试中引入人体模型测试。目前缺乏关于临床许可人体模型测试的有效性和准确性的研究。本研究的目的是确定口腔卫生教育者对使用人体模型进行口腔卫生临床执照考试的看法。方法本定性研究采用探索性、在线、焦点小组设计,通过有目的抽样,招募20名口腔卫生教育工作者。使用假名是为了保护参与者的隐私。两组教育工作者来自在COVID-19期间没有使用人体模型测试的机构,两组教育工作者来自在同一时期使用人体模型测试的机构。采用经典分析策略对主题进行分析。有效性是通过研究者三角测量、成员检查和饱和度来确定的。结果缺乏知识,包括对人体检查的先入为主的假设;关于人体模型与活体患者的益处和关注点的测试考虑;关于单点时间临床许可考试的价值的看法是参与者确定的三个主要主题。结论:人体模型考试似乎解决了伦理问题,然而,在评估批判性思维和决策能力方面存在局限性。有些与会者表示,从认可的口腔卫生课程毕业,就足以获得执照。未来的研究应包括完成临床执照考试的应届毕业生与未完成临床执照考试的毕业生的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dental Hygiene is the refereed, scientific publication of the American Dental Hygienists’ Association. It promotes the publication of original research related to the practice and education of dental hygiene. It supports the development and dissemination of a dental hygiene body of knowledge through scientific inquiry in basic, applied, and clinical research.
期刊最新文献
Advances and Challenges in Pediatric Oral Health. DIY Orthodontic Relapse Correction Gone Wrong: A case study. Fluoride in 2025. The Role of Reporting Guidelines in Research Publication. Improving Dental Hygiene Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence Toward Prenatal Oral Health Through Experiential Learning: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1