Mulliken's Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Early Outcome Analysis.

Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.906
Mansoor Khan, Hidayat Ullah, Alamzeb Khan, Waqas Hayat
{"title":"Mulliken's Bilateral Cleft Lip Repair: Early Outcome Analysis.","authors":"Mansoor Khan,&nbsp;Hidayat Ullah,&nbsp;Alamzeb Khan,&nbsp;Waqas Hayat","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the early surgical outcome of Mulliken's repair technique for bilateral cleft lip.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the study: Burns and Plastic Surgery Centre, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, from January 2020 to December 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study included 51 patients with bilateral cleft lip deformity. Patients were evaluated preoperatively to exclude any associated congenital anomalies or comorbidities. Then the patients were classified into mild, moderate, severe, and asymmetrical cases. Outcomes were determined immediately and one week postoperatively, as good (score 16-20), fair (score 11-15), and bad (0-10) on the basis of anthropometric measurements on outcome evaluation criteria (OEC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperatively mild, moderate, and severe bilateral cleft lips were observed in 18 (35.3%), 6 (11.85%), and 15 (29.4%), respectively, while 10 (19.6%) were bilateral asymmetrical cleft lips. The postoperative outcome score ranged from 16 to 20 (mean 19.2+1.03) which falls in the good outcome range. Nasal symmetry was good in 64.7% (n=33) cases while 31.4% (n=16) patients had satisfactory scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although Mulliken's repair is by far the most prevalent type of repair for bilateral cleft lip patients, the results can vary markedly. The early outcome evaluation criteria is an objective tool to measure the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Cleft lip, Bilateral cleft lip, Mulliken, Mulliken's repair, Day care surgery, Outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"33 8","pages":"906-909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the early surgical outcome of Mulliken's repair technique for bilateral cleft lip.

Study design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the study: Burns and Plastic Surgery Centre, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, Pakistan, from January 2020 to December 2021.

Methodology: This study included 51 patients with bilateral cleft lip deformity. Patients were evaluated preoperatively to exclude any associated congenital anomalies or comorbidities. Then the patients were classified into mild, moderate, severe, and asymmetrical cases. Outcomes were determined immediately and one week postoperatively, as good (score 16-20), fair (score 11-15), and bad (0-10) on the basis of anthropometric measurements on outcome evaluation criteria (OEC).

Results: Preoperatively mild, moderate, and severe bilateral cleft lips were observed in 18 (35.3%), 6 (11.85%), and 15 (29.4%), respectively, while 10 (19.6%) were bilateral asymmetrical cleft lips. The postoperative outcome score ranged from 16 to 20 (mean 19.2+1.03) which falls in the good outcome range. Nasal symmetry was good in 64.7% (n=33) cases while 31.4% (n=16) patients had satisfactory scores.

Conclusion: Although Mulliken's repair is by far the most prevalent type of repair for bilateral cleft lip patients, the results can vary markedly. The early outcome evaluation criteria is an objective tool to measure the outcomes.

Key words: Cleft lip, Bilateral cleft lip, Mulliken, Mulliken's repair, Day care surgery, Outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Mulliken双侧唇裂修复:早期结果分析。
目的:探讨双侧唇裂Mulliken修复术的早期手术效果。研究设计:描述性横断面研究。研究地点和持续时间:2020年1月至2021年12月,巴基斯坦白沙瓦Hayatabad医疗中心烧伤和整形外科中心。方法:本研究纳入51例双侧唇裂畸形患者。术前对患者进行评估以排除任何相关的先天性异常或合并症。然后将患者分为轻度、中度、重度和不对称病例。根据结果评价标准(OEC)的人体测量结果,立即和术后一周确定结果为良好(16-20分)、一般(11-15分)和差(0-10分)。结果:术前轻度、中度、重度双侧唇裂分别为18例(35.3%)、6例(11.85%)、15例(29.4%),双侧不对称唇裂10例(19.6%)。术后预后评分范围为16 ~ 20分(平均19.2+1.03),属于良好预后范围。64.7% (n=33)患者鼻对称性良好,31.4% (n=16)患者满意。结论:尽管Mulliken修复术是目前双侧唇裂患者最常用的修复方法,但其效果差异很大。早期结果评价标准是衡量结果的客观工具。关键词:唇裂,双侧唇裂,Mulliken, Mulliken修复,日间护理手术,结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1