Investigating the impact of adjunctive priming repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in late-life depression: a pilot single-blind randomized control study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY CNS Spectrums Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1017/S1092852923002407
Kote L Vidya, Shrikant Srivastava, Bhupendra Singh, Sujita K Kar
{"title":"Investigating the impact of adjunctive priming repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in late-life depression: a pilot single-blind randomized control study.","authors":"Kote L Vidya, Shrikant Srivastava, Bhupendra Singh, Sujita K Kar","doi":"10.1017/S1092852923002407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional treatment methods have limited effectiveness in addressing late-life depression (LLD) that does not respond well. While a new approach called priming repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise in treating depression in adults, its effectiveness in LLD has not been explored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of priming rTMS on LLD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated the effectiveness of priming rTMS in 31 patients with LLD who did not improve after an adequate trial of antidepressants. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either active priming rTMS or sham priming rTMS. Active priming rTMS was delivered over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 10 sessions, lasting 31 minutes each, over a period of 2 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group receiving active priming rTMS demonstrated greater improvements in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (<i>p</i> < 0.037; partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> 0.141) and the Geriatric Depression Rating Scale (<i>p</i> < 0.045; partial <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> 0.131) compared to the sham priming group, with a mild effect size. At the end of the second and fourth weeks, the priming rTMS group achieved a response rate of 50%, while the sham priming group had response rates of 26.7% and 6.7%, respectively. No adverse effects requiring intervention were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Priming rTMS is well-tolerated for the treatment of LLD and not only reduces the severity of depression but also maintains the achieved response over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":10505,"journal":{"name":"CNS Spectrums","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Spectrums","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852923002407","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conventional treatment methods have limited effectiveness in addressing late-life depression (LLD) that does not respond well. While a new approach called priming repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise in treating depression in adults, its effectiveness in LLD has not been explored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of priming rTMS on LLD.

Methods: This study investigated the effectiveness of priming rTMS in 31 patients with LLD who did not improve after an adequate trial of antidepressants. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either active priming rTMS or sham priming rTMS. Active priming rTMS was delivered over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for 10 sessions, lasting 31 minutes each, over a period of 2 weeks.

Results: The group receiving active priming rTMS demonstrated greater improvements in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (p < 0.037; partial η2 0.141) and the Geriatric Depression Rating Scale (p < 0.045; partial η2 0.131) compared to the sham priming group, with a mild effect size. At the end of the second and fourth weeks, the priming rTMS group achieved a response rate of 50%, while the sham priming group had response rates of 26.7% and 6.7%, respectively. No adverse effects requiring intervention were observed.

Conclusion: Priming rTMS is well-tolerated for the treatment of LLD and not only reduces the severity of depression but also maintains the achieved response over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查辅助性引物重复经颅磁刺激对晚年抑郁症的影响:单盲随机对照试验研究。
背景:传统治疗方法在治疗反应不佳的晚年抑郁症(LLD)方面效果有限。虽然一种名为 "引导性重复经颅磁刺激"(rTMS)的新方法已显示出治疗成人抑郁症的前景,但其对晚期抑郁症的疗效尚未得到探讨。本研究旨在调查引物经颅磁刺激对 LLD 的影响:本研究对31名经抗抑郁药充分治疗后仍无改善的LLD患者的经颅磁刺激治疗效果进行了调查。患者被随机分配接受主动引导经颅磁刺激或假引导经颅磁刺激。在右侧背外侧前额叶皮层进行主动引物经颅磁刺激,共10次,每次31分钟,为期2周:结果:与假激活组相比,接受主动激活经颅磁刺激组在汉密尔顿抑郁量表(P η2 0.141)和老年抑郁量表(P η2 0.131)上的得分有了更大的改善,效应大小轻微。在第二周和第四周结束时,经颅磁刺激起动组的反应率达到50%,而假起动组的反应率分别为26.7%和6.7%。没有观察到需要干预的不良反应:引物经颅磁刺激治疗 LLD 的耐受性良好,不仅能减轻抑郁症的严重程度,还能长期保持所取得的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Spectrums
CNS Spectrums 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
239
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Spectrums covers all aspects of the clinical neurosciences, neurotherapeutics, and neuropsychopharmacology, particularly those pertinent to the clinician and clinical investigator. The journal features focused, in-depth reviews, perspectives, and original research articles. New therapeutics of all types in psychiatry, mental health, and neurology are emphasized, especially first in man studies, proof of concept studies, and translational basic neuroscience studies. Subject coverage spans the full spectrum of neuropsychiatry, focusing on those crossing traditional boundaries between neurology and psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Comparing two transitioning strategies to paliperidone palmitate once-every-6-months. Criteria and diagnostic scale of the post-combat delayed response (tension) syndrome. A clinical algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of insomnia in adults: an updated review. Efficacy of esketamine for perinatal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Liberty or life: mental health care in Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1