Effectiveness, Safety, and Acceptance of an Interim Orthosis in Patients with Diabetes in the Immediate Postoperative Chopart Surgery.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1177/15347346211023041
Gianmario Balduzzi, Roberto De Giglio, Benedetta Masserini, Ilaria Formenti, Sara Lodigiani, Teresa Mondello, Nicola Mumoli, Basilio Pintaudi, Giacoma Di Vieste
{"title":"Effectiveness, Safety, and Acceptance of an Interim Orthosis in Patients with Diabetes in the Immediate Postoperative Chopart Surgery.","authors":"Gianmario Balduzzi,&nbsp;Roberto De Giglio,&nbsp;Benedetta Masserini,&nbsp;Ilaria Formenti,&nbsp;Sara Lodigiani,&nbsp;Teresa Mondello,&nbsp;Nicola Mumoli,&nbsp;Basilio Pintaudi,&nbsp;Giacoma Di Vieste","doi":"10.1177/15347346211023041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chopart amputation is the consequence of severe diabetes-related foot complications. A new interim orthosis allowing the patient a greater degree of mobility after Chopart surgery than currently used systems is now available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the new orthosis compared with traditional treatment. Safety and level of patient acceptance of the device were also investigated. We performed a retrospective case-control observational study involving people with diabetes who underwent Chopart amputation between January 2016 and January 2018. The sample of subjects treated with the innovative orthosis was compared with consecutive patients, who were treated with traditional management. The main study outcomes include major amputation occurrence, ulcer recurrence, healing time, and patient acceptance of the orthosis. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the Italian validated version of the Orthotic Prosthetic User's Survey (OPUS) questionnaire. Overall, 27 subjects were enrolled using the new device (mean age 68.7 ± 8.4 years, 70.4% males, mean diabetes duration 22.7 ± 15 years). Clinical baseline characteristics were comparable between the cases and the controls. There was no difference between the groups in the healed wound rate (81.5% vs 80.0% for cases and the control group, respectively, <i>P</i> = .53). The ulcer recurrence rate was higher in the control group compared with subjects using the new orthosis (62.5% vs 24.0%, respectively, <i>P</i> = .04). The use of the innovative orthosis was associated with an 81% lower probability to have ulcer recurrence (odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.04-1.04). No between groups difference was detected for a major amputation rate. The wound healing time was faster for cases compared with controls (160.4 ± 114.1 vs 256.5 ± 112.9 days, <i>P</i> = .05). No adverse events related to the use of the new orthosis were recorded. Patient acceptance of the new orthosis was high. This orthosis can be recommended as an efficient, safe, and well-accepted device after Chopart amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/15347346211023041","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346211023041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Chopart amputation is the consequence of severe diabetes-related foot complications. A new interim orthosis allowing the patient a greater degree of mobility after Chopart surgery than currently used systems is now available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the new orthosis compared with traditional treatment. Safety and level of patient acceptance of the device were also investigated. We performed a retrospective case-control observational study involving people with diabetes who underwent Chopart amputation between January 2016 and January 2018. The sample of subjects treated with the innovative orthosis was compared with consecutive patients, who were treated with traditional management. The main study outcomes include major amputation occurrence, ulcer recurrence, healing time, and patient acceptance of the orthosis. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the Italian validated version of the Orthotic Prosthetic User's Survey (OPUS) questionnaire. Overall, 27 subjects were enrolled using the new device (mean age 68.7 ± 8.4 years, 70.4% males, mean diabetes duration 22.7 ± 15 years). Clinical baseline characteristics were comparable between the cases and the controls. There was no difference between the groups in the healed wound rate (81.5% vs 80.0% for cases and the control group, respectively, P = .53). The ulcer recurrence rate was higher in the control group compared with subjects using the new orthosis (62.5% vs 24.0%, respectively, P = .04). The use of the innovative orthosis was associated with an 81% lower probability to have ulcer recurrence (odds ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.04-1.04). No between groups difference was detected for a major amputation rate. The wound healing time was faster for cases compared with controls (160.4 ± 114.1 vs 256.5 ± 112.9 days, P = .05). No adverse events related to the use of the new orthosis were recorded. Patient acceptance of the new orthosis was high. This orthosis can be recommended as an efficient, safe, and well-accepted device after Chopart amputation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者术后即刻Chopart手术中临时矫形器的有效性、安全性和可接受性。
Chopart截肢是严重的糖尿病相关足部并发症的后果。一种新的临时矫形器允许患者在Chopart手术后比目前使用的系统有更大程度的活动。本研究的目的是评估新型矫形器与传统矫形器的效果。安全性和患者对该装置的接受程度也进行了调查。我们进行了一项回顾性病例对照观察性研究,涉及2016年1月至2018年1月期间接受Chopart截肢的糖尿病患者。采用创新矫形器治疗的患者样本与连续采用传统矫形器治疗的患者样本进行比较。主要研究结果包括大截肢发生率、溃疡复发、愈合时间和患者对矫形器的接受程度。使用意大利验证版的矫形义肢用户调查(OPUS)问卷评估患者满意度。总体而言,27名受试者使用新设备入组(平均年龄68.7±8.4岁,70.4%为男性,平均糖尿病病程22.7±15年)。病例和对照组的临床基线特征具有可比性。两组创面愈合率差异无统计学意义(病例81.5% vs对照组80.0%,P = 0.53)。对照组溃疡复发率高于使用新型矫形器组(62.5% vs 24.0%, P = 0.04)。使用创新矫形器可使溃疡复发的概率降低81%(优势比0.19,95%可信区间0.04-1.04)。两组间主要截肢率无差异。治疗组创面愈合时间较对照组快(160.4±114.1 vs 256.5±112.9,P = 0.05)。没有记录与使用新矫形器相关的不良事件。患者对新矫形器的接受度很高。该矫形器是Chopart截肢后一种有效、安全且被广泛接受的矫形器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Identification of High-Risk Lower Extremity Wounds Using Point-of-Care Test for Bacterial Protease Activity; A Single-Centre, Single-Blinded, Prospective Study Retracted: "The Leg Subcutaneous Tissue Calcification and Venous Ulcer-a Case Series". Sticking to What Matters: A Matched Comparative Study of Fibrin Glue and Mechanical Fixation for Split-Thickness Skin Grafts in the Lower Extremity. Cases of Lower Extremity and Perianal Burns at the Burn Center in the Southeast Anatolia of Turkey. Superficial Tissue Swabs Versus Deep Tissue Samples in the Detection of Microbiological Profile of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1