Early Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Using an Anterior Approach Increases Blood Loss but not Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002684
Brian H Mullis, Joshua H Chang, Nihar Shah, Ramsey S Sabbagh, Qing Yu, Michael T Archdeacon, H Claude Sagi, Roman M Natoli
{"title":"Early Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Using an Anterior Approach Increases Blood Loss but not Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion.","authors":"Brian H Mullis, Joshua H Chang, Nihar Shah, Ramsey S Sabbagh, Qing Yu, Michael T Archdeacon, H Claude Sagi, Roman M Natoli","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine whether time from hospital admission to surgery for acetabular fractures using an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach affected blood loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three level 1 trauma centers at 2 academic institutions.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Adult (18 years or older) patients with no pre-existing coagulopathy treated for an acetabular fracture via an AIP approach. Excluded were those with other significant same day procedures (irrigation and debridement and external fixation were the only other allowed procedures).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Multiple methods for evaluating blood loss were investigated, including estimated blood loss (EBL), calculated blood loss (CBL) by Gross and Hgb balance methods, and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirement. Outcomes were evaluated based on time to surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>195 patients were studied. On continuous linear analysis, increasing time from admission to surgery was significantly associated with decreasing CBL at 24 hours (-1.45 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.003; -0.440 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.003) and 3 days (-1.69 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.013; -0.497 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.010) postoperative, but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Using 48 hours from admission to surgery to define early versus delayed surgery, CBL was significantly greater in the early group compared to the delayed group (453 [IQR 277-733] mL early versus 364 [IQR 160-661] delayed by Gross method, P = 0.017; 165 [IQR 99-249] g of Hgb early versus 143 [IQR 55-238] g Hgb delayed by Hgb balance method, P = 0.035), but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. In addition, in multivariate linear regression, neither giving tranexamic acid nor administering prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism on the morning of surgery affected blood loss at 24 hours or 3 days postoperative ( P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was higher blood loss with early surgery using an AIP approach, but early surgery did not affect PRBC transfusion and may not be clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":"e28-e35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine whether time from hospital admission to surgery for acetabular fractures using an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach affected blood loss.

Methods:

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Three level 1 trauma centers at 2 academic institutions.

Patient selection criteria: Adult (18 years or older) patients with no pre-existing coagulopathy treated for an acetabular fracture via an AIP approach. Excluded were those with other significant same day procedures (irrigation and debridement and external fixation were the only other allowed procedures).

Outcome measures and comparisons: Multiple methods for evaluating blood loss were investigated, including estimated blood loss (EBL), calculated blood loss (CBL) by Gross and Hgb balance methods, and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirement. Outcomes were evaluated based on time to surgery.

Results: 195 patients were studied. On continuous linear analysis, increasing time from admission to surgery was significantly associated with decreasing CBL at 24 hours (-1.45 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.003; -0.440 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.003) and 3 days (-1.69 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.013; -0.497 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.010) postoperative, but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Using 48 hours from admission to surgery to define early versus delayed surgery, CBL was significantly greater in the early group compared to the delayed group (453 [IQR 277-733] mL early versus 364 [IQR 160-661] delayed by Gross method, P = 0.017; 165 [IQR 99-249] g of Hgb early versus 143 [IQR 55-238] g Hgb delayed by Hgb balance method, P = 0.035), but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. In addition, in multivariate linear regression, neither giving tranexamic acid nor administering prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism on the morning of surgery affected blood loss at 24 hours or 3 days postoperative ( P > 0.05).

Conclusion: There was higher blood loss with early surgery using an AIP approach, but early surgery did not affect PRBC transfusion and may not be clinically relevant.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用前路方法早期治疗髋臼骨折会增加失血量,但不会增加红细胞输血量。
研究目的本研究的目的是确定采用前骨盆内(AIP)入路治疗髋臼骨折从入院到手术的时间是否会影响失血量:设计:回顾性研究:方法: 设计:回顾性研究:患者选择标准:通过 AIP 入路治疗髋臼骨折的无凝血功能障碍的成人(18 岁或以上)患者。结果测量和比较:研究了多种评估失血量的方法,包括估计失血量(EBL)、通过毛细血管平衡法和血红蛋白平衡法计算的失血量(CBL)以及包装红细胞(PRBC)输血需求。结果根据手术时间进行评估:研究了 195 名患者。在连续线性分析中,从入院到手术时间的延长与术后 24 小时(格罗斯法为每小时-1.45 毫升,P = 0.003;血红蛋白平衡法为每小时-0.440 克血红蛋白,P = 0.003)和术后 3 天(格罗斯法为每小时-1.69 毫升,P = 0.013;血红蛋白平衡法为每小时-0.497 克血红蛋白,P = 0.010)CBL 的下降显著相关,但与 EBL 或 PRBC 输血量无关。用从入院到手术的 48 小时来定义早期手术和延迟手术,早期手术组的 CBL 显著高于延迟手术组(采用 Gross 方法,早期手术组为 453 [IQR 277-733] mL,延迟手术组为 364 [IQR 160-661],P = 0.017;采用血红蛋白平衡方法,早期手术组为 165 [IQR 99-249] g Hgb,延迟手术组为 143 [IQR 55-238] g Hgb,P = 0.035),但不包括 EBL 或 PRBC 输注。此外,在多变量线性回归中,手术当天早上给予氨甲环酸或静脉血栓栓塞预防性抗凝均不会影响术后 24 小时或 3 天的失血量(P > 0.05):结论:采用AIP方法提前手术的失血量较高,但提前手术并不影响PRBC输注,可能与临床无关:证据等级:治疗三级。有关证据级别的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of Expedited Time to Hip Fracture Surgery Differs Based on Patient Risk Profile. The Midline Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy: A Safe Alternative Approach for Lateral Tibial Plateau Fractures. The Effects of a Stepped-Care Mental Health Program on Trauma Recidivism at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Tibial Malalignment is an Independent Predictor of Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1