The Role of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and its Common Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.37616/2212-5043.1340
Javed Jalbani, Khalid I Bhatti, Muhammad T Sallar, Ahsan M Baig, Palwasha Tariq, Faisal Ahmed, Ali Ammar, Vicky Kumar
{"title":"The Role of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and its Common Clinical Outcomes Among Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Javed Jalbani,&nbsp;Khalid I Bhatti,&nbsp;Muhammad T Sallar,&nbsp;Ahsan M Baig,&nbsp;Palwasha Tariq,&nbsp;Faisal Ahmed,&nbsp;Ali Ammar,&nbsp;Vicky Kumar","doi":"10.37616/2212-5043.1340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for risk stratification for in-hospital outcomes and complications in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (non-ST-ACS) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited consecutive patients with non-ST-ACS. The NLR was obtained and stratified as low, intermediate, and high-risk based on <3.0, 3.0-6.0, and >6.0, respectively. The new ST-T changes, arrhythmias, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), and mortality were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median NLR was 3 [2.1-5.3] for 346 patients with 19.9% and 30.6% in high- and intermediate-risk group. New ST-T changes were observed in 3.5% (12) out of which 8, 3, and 1 patient in low, intermediate, and high-risk group (p = 0.424), respectively. Arrhythmias were observed in 5.8% (20) with 7, 5, and 8 patients in low, intermediate, and high-risk group (p = 0.067), respectively. CIN was observed in 4.9% (17) with 5, 5, and 7 in low, intermediate, and high-risk group (p = 0.064), respectively. In-hospital mortality was recorded in 1.4% (5) with 2 and 3 patients in high and low-risk group (p = 0.260), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A significant number of non-ST-ACS patients fall in the high-risk category of NLR. Although, the association between NLR and in-hospital mortality and adverse events was not statistically significant but relatively higher rates of events were observed in high risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":17319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","volume":"35 2","pages":"177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/96/sha177-182.PMC10405906.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37616/2212-5043.1340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for risk stratification for in-hospital outcomes and complications in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (non-ST-ACS) patients.

Methods: We recruited consecutive patients with non-ST-ACS. The NLR was obtained and stratified as low, intermediate, and high-risk based on <3.0, 3.0-6.0, and >6.0, respectively. The new ST-T changes, arrhythmias, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), and mortality were recorded.

Results: Median NLR was 3 [2.1-5.3] for 346 patients with 19.9% and 30.6% in high- and intermediate-risk group. New ST-T changes were observed in 3.5% (12) out of which 8, 3, and 1 patient in low, intermediate, and high-risk group (p = 0.424), respectively. Arrhythmias were observed in 5.8% (20) with 7, 5, and 8 patients in low, intermediate, and high-risk group (p = 0.067), respectively. CIN was observed in 4.9% (17) with 5, 5, and 7 in low, intermediate, and high-risk group (p = 0.064), respectively. In-hospital mortality was recorded in 1.4% (5) with 2 and 3 patients in high and low-risk group (p = 0.260), respectively.

Conclusion: A significant number of non-ST-ACS patients fall in the high-risk category of NLR. Although, the association between NLR and in-hospital mortality and adverse events was not statistically significant but relatively higher rates of events were observed in high risk group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在非st段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者中的作用及其常见临床结局
目的:评价非st段抬高急性冠脉综合征(non-ST-ACS)患者入院时中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对住院结局和并发症的风险分层。方法:我们招募连续的非st - acs患者。NLR评分为6.0分,分别为低、中、高风险。记录新的ST-T变化、心律失常、造影剂肾病(CIN)和死亡率。结果:346例患者中位NLR为3[2.1 ~ 5.3],高危组19.9%,中危组30.6%。3.5%(12例)患者出现新的ST-T改变,其中低、中、高风险组分别为8例、3例和1例(p = 0.424)。低、中、高危组心律失常发生率分别为7、5、8例(p = 0.067),占5.8%(20例)。CIN发生率为4.9%(17),低、中、高危组分别为5例、5例、7例(p = 0.064)。住院死亡率为1.4%(5),高危组2例,低危组3例(p = 0.260)。结论:大量非st - acs患者属于NLR的高危类别。虽然NLR与住院死亡率和不良事件之间的相关性无统计学意义,但高危组不良事件发生率相对较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Versus Mitral-valve Surgery in Elderly Patients With Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Mitral Valve Prolapse with Syncope: Don't Judge the Book by its Cover! Comparison of Sternotomy Access Versus Thoracotomy Access in the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Coarctation: A Propensity Score-matched Study. A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease. Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrollment and Secondary Prevention Adherence in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cross-sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1