Effects of education on pain and anxiety before and after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Adem Gencer, Gürhan Öz, Ersin Gunay, Ahmet Dumanlı
{"title":"Effects of education on pain and anxiety before and after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.","authors":"Adem Gencer,&nbsp;Gürhan Öz,&nbsp;Ersin Gunay,&nbsp;Ahmet Dumanlı","doi":"10.5114/kitp.2023.129550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a common surgical procedure.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To find out how educating patients using multimedia affects their pain and anxiety before and after VATS surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 50 patients who underwent VATS between December 2017 and December 2018. The subjects were divided into two groups: the multimedia information group (MIG) and the control group (<i>n</i> = 25). The subjects underwent STAI-T testing, preoperative and postoperative STAI-S testing, and pulmonary function tests (PFT) before surgery and after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients in the MIG had higher baseline anxiety levels than those in the control groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic information, surgical characteristics, or vital signs. There was a statistically significant difference in the preoperative (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and the postoperative (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) pain scores between MIG and control groups. The postoperative STAI-S scores of MIG increased, but this increase was not significant. In both groups, there was no significant difference in the changes in systolic blood pressure (<i>p</i> = 0.656) or respiratory rate (<i>p</i> = 0.05). There was no difference between post-training and pre- and post-operative pain scores in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Providing multimedia information before surgery has some effect on pain. However, providing multimedia information does not reduce postoperative anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49945,"journal":{"name":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/69/04/KITP-20-51122.PMC10410629.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiochirurgia I Torakochirurgia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2023.129550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a common surgical procedure.

Aim: To find out how educating patients using multimedia affects their pain and anxiety before and after VATS surgery.

Material and methods: The study included 50 patients who underwent VATS between December 2017 and December 2018. The subjects were divided into two groups: the multimedia information group (MIG) and the control group (n = 25). The subjects underwent STAI-T testing, preoperative and postoperative STAI-S testing, and pulmonary function tests (PFT) before surgery and after surgery.

Results: The patients in the MIG had higher baseline anxiety levels than those in the control groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic information, surgical characteristics, or vital signs. There was a statistically significant difference in the preoperative (p = 0.001) and the postoperative (p = 0.0001) pain scores between MIG and control groups. The postoperative STAI-S scores of MIG increased, but this increase was not significant. In both groups, there was no significant difference in the changes in systolic blood pressure (p = 0.656) or respiratory rate (p = 0.05). There was no difference between post-training and pre- and post-operative pain scores in both groups.

Conclusions: Providing multimedia information before surgery has some effect on pain. However, providing multimedia information does not reduce postoperative anxiety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育对胸腔镜手术前后疼痛和焦虑的影响。
视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)是一种常见的外科手术。目的:探讨多媒体教育对VATS手术前后患者疼痛和焦虑的影响。材料和方法:该研究包括50名在2017年12月至2018年12月期间接受VATS治疗的患者。将受试者分为两组:多媒体信息组(MIG)和对照组(n = 25)。患者术前、术后均行STAI-T检测、STAI-S检测、肺功能检测(PFT)。结果:MIG组患者的基线焦虑水平高于对照组。两组在人口学信息、手术特征或生命体征方面无显著差异。MIG组与对照组术前(p = 0.001)和术后(p = 0.0001)疼痛评分比较,差异均有统计学意义。术后MIG的STAI-S评分升高,但升高不显著。两组患者收缩压变化(p = 0.656)、呼吸频率变化(p = 0.05)差异无统计学意义。两组的训练后和术前、术后疼痛评分均无差异。结论:术前提供多媒体信息对缓解疼痛有一定作用。然而,提供多媒体信息并不能减少术后焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is a quarterly aimed at cardiologists, cardiosurgeons and thoracic surgeons. Includes the original works (experimental, research and development), illustrative and casuistical works about cardiology and cardiosurgery.
期刊最新文献
Clinicodemographic profile and outcomes of congenital diaphragmatic hernia with sac: experience of a paediatric referral centre. Comparison of the effect of chest tube diameter on drainage rate and tube performance in patients with pleural effusion. A cross-sectional study. Enhancing treatment approaches for postpneumonectomy empyema: exploring the role of video-assisted thoracic surgery. Optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting late. Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis versus Trifecta sutured bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: immediate results of the Perfecta study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1