Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Anticipate DIY E-juice Mixing among Young Adult International E-cigarette Users.

Rachael A Record, Maxwell Groznik, Mark A Sussman
{"title":"Using the Theory of Planned Behavior to Anticipate DIY E-juice Mixing among Young Adult International E-cigarette Users.","authors":"Rachael A Record,&nbsp;Maxwell Groznik,&nbsp;Mark A Sussman","doi":"10.34172/ahj.2023.1385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trends in young adult use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and experimentation with do-it-yourself (DIY) e-juice mixing are growing around the world. Theoretical frameworks for examining secondary behaviors (i.e., mixing) embedded within a primary behavior (i.e., vaping) are limited, leading to challenges in scholarly understanding of behavioral performance. This study explored the theoretically driven factors surrounding ENDS users' decision to mix DIY e-juice through a multiple behavior test of the theory of planned behavior (TPB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international sample of young adult participants aged 18-19 (n=203) was recruited from Prolific for an online crosssectional survey. Path modeling tested four theoretically driven models to explore behavioral performance of mixing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The data supported TPB expectations and revealed new paths for secondary behavior. Primary perceptions of attitudes, norms, and intention were predictive of the same secondary perceptions. In addition, for both primary and secondary behaviors, perceived norms were a function of perceived attitudes. For the secondary behavior, normative influence was experienced indirectly through perceived attitudes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIY e-juice mixing is a product of perceived attitudes and behavioral control surrounding mixing as well as perceived attitudes, norms, and intention surrounding general ENDS use. While unregulated DIY experimentation increases among youth, these findings provide a lens for public health efforts seeking to reach and reduce use. Understanding DIY e-juice behaviors is essential to anticipate stockpiling behaviors and negative outcomes from amateur experimentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":33943,"journal":{"name":"Addiction and Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/10/56/ahj-15-23.PMC10408742.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ahj.2023.1385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trends in young adult use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and experimentation with do-it-yourself (DIY) e-juice mixing are growing around the world. Theoretical frameworks for examining secondary behaviors (i.e., mixing) embedded within a primary behavior (i.e., vaping) are limited, leading to challenges in scholarly understanding of behavioral performance. This study explored the theoretically driven factors surrounding ENDS users' decision to mix DIY e-juice through a multiple behavior test of the theory of planned behavior (TPB).

Methods: An international sample of young adult participants aged 18-19 (n=203) was recruited from Prolific for an online crosssectional survey. Path modeling tested four theoretically driven models to explore behavioral performance of mixing.

Findings: The data supported TPB expectations and revealed new paths for secondary behavior. Primary perceptions of attitudes, norms, and intention were predictive of the same secondary perceptions. In addition, for both primary and secondary behaviors, perceived norms were a function of perceived attitudes. For the secondary behavior, normative influence was experienced indirectly through perceived attitudes.

Conclusion: DIY e-juice mixing is a product of perceived attitudes and behavioral control surrounding mixing as well as perceived attitudes, norms, and intention surrounding general ENDS use. While unregulated DIY experimentation increases among youth, these findings provide a lens for public health efforts seeking to reach and reduce use. Understanding DIY e-juice behaviors is essential to anticipate stockpiling behaviors and negative outcomes from amateur experimentation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用计划行为理论预测青少年国际电子烟用户的DIY电子烟混合。
背景:年轻人使用电子尼古丁输送系统(ENDS)和自己动手(DIY)混合电子果汁的趋势在世界各地都在增长。研究嵌入在主要行为(如吸电子烟)中的次要行为(如混合)的理论框架是有限的,这导致了对行为表现的学术理解的挑战。本研究通过对计划行为理论(TPB)的多重行为测试,探讨了终端用户混合DIY电子果汁决策的理论驱动因素。方法:从多产公司招募了18-19岁的国际青年参与者(n=203)进行在线横断面调查。路径建模测试了四种理论驱动模型来探索混合的行为性能。研究结果:数据支持TPB预期,并揭示了次要行为的新途径。对态度、规范和意图的初级知觉可以预测同样的次级知觉。此外,对于主要和次要行为,感知规范是感知态度的函数。对于次要行为,规范性影响是通过感知态度间接体验的。结论:DIY电子果汁混合是对混合的感知态度和行为控制以及对一般终端使用的感知态度、规范和意图的产物。虽然不受管制的DIY实验在年轻人中有所增加,但这些发现为寻求普及和减少使用的公共卫生努力提供了一个视角。了解DIY电子果汁的行为对于预测囤积行为和业余实验的负面结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol Abstinence, Adherence, and Attitudes toward Disulfiram Treatment for Alcohol Dependence among Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Setting in North India. Characteristics of Waterpipe Smokers Who Are Willing to Quit: Population-Based Findings from Syria. Does Tramadol Exposure Have Unfavorable Effects on Hippocampus? A Review Study. Potential Involvement of Apelin/APJ System in Addiction and Neuroprotection Against Drugs of Abuse. Smartphone Usage and Addiction among Undergraduate Dental Students in South India: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1