Neurocognitive Functions Related to Parietal Lobe in Patients with Schizophrenia and Methamphetamine Induced Psychotic Disorder and Healthy Individuals: A Comparative Study.

Navid Khalili, Shahrzad Mazhari, Nahid Mortazavi
{"title":"Neurocognitive Functions Related to Parietal Lobe in Patients with Schizophrenia and Methamphetamine Induced Psychotic Disorder and Healthy Individuals: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Navid Khalili,&nbsp;Shahrzad Mazhari,&nbsp;Nahid Mortazavi","doi":"10.34172/ahj.2022.1246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are some inconsistent findings about neurocognitive functions in schizophrenia and methamphetamine induced psychosis (MIP). This study aimed to compare these two disorders in terms of neurocognitive functions related to parietal lobe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study in which 30 patients with schizophrenia, 30 patients with MIP, and 32 healthy individuals were compared. The two groups of patients were selected through convenience sampling from among patients hospitalized in Shahid Beheshti hospital in Kerman, Iran and healthy individuals were selected via convenience sampling from among the employees of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. The three groups were administered clock-drawing test (CDT), Rey-Osterrieth complex figure (ROCF) copying test, and interlocking finger test (IFT) and their demographic and clinical data were collected. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to investigate the differences between the groups. Multivariate analysis of covariance was also used to examine the effects of confounding factors. Besides, follow-up pairwise comparisons were performed after adjustment for multiple testing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The group with schizophrenia had significantly more impairment than the group with MIP with reference to the results of IFT and the ROCF test. However, the scores of patients with MIP on these two tests were not different from those of the normal controls. With regard to the CDT, the only significant difference was observed between the group with schizophrenia and controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On the condition that the results are replicated in other studies, some parietal lobe neurocognitive tests might be used when it is difficult to differentially diagnose schizophrenia and MIP.</p>","PeriodicalId":33943,"journal":{"name":"Addiction and Health","volume":"14 4","pages":"244-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/dd/ahj-14-244.PMC10408750.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ahj.2022.1246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are some inconsistent findings about neurocognitive functions in schizophrenia and methamphetamine induced psychosis (MIP). This study aimed to compare these two disorders in terms of neurocognitive functions related to parietal lobe.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which 30 patients with schizophrenia, 30 patients with MIP, and 32 healthy individuals were compared. The two groups of patients were selected through convenience sampling from among patients hospitalized in Shahid Beheshti hospital in Kerman, Iran and healthy individuals were selected via convenience sampling from among the employees of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. The three groups were administered clock-drawing test (CDT), Rey-Osterrieth complex figure (ROCF) copying test, and interlocking finger test (IFT) and their demographic and clinical data were collected. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to investigate the differences between the groups. Multivariate analysis of covariance was also used to examine the effects of confounding factors. Besides, follow-up pairwise comparisons were performed after adjustment for multiple testing.

Findings: The group with schizophrenia had significantly more impairment than the group with MIP with reference to the results of IFT and the ROCF test. However, the scores of patients with MIP on these two tests were not different from those of the normal controls. With regard to the CDT, the only significant difference was observed between the group with schizophrenia and controls.

Conclusion: On the condition that the results are replicated in other studies, some parietal lobe neurocognitive tests might be used when it is difficult to differentially diagnose schizophrenia and MIP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症和甲基苯丙胺所致精神障碍患者与健康个体的顶叶相关神经认知功能的比较研究
背景:关于精神分裂症和甲基苯丙胺性精神病(MIP)的神经认知功能,目前有一些不一致的发现。本研究旨在比较这两种疾病在与顶叶相关的神经认知功能方面的差异。方法:这是一项横断面研究,将30例精神分裂症患者、30例MIP患者和32例健康个体进行比较。两组患者分别从伊朗克尔曼Shahid Beheshti医院住院患者和克尔曼医科大学员工中方便抽样选取健康个体。对三组患者分别进行时钟绘制测试(CDT)、Rey-Osterrieth复像(ROCF)复制测试和互锁手指测试(IFT),并收集其人口学和临床资料。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)分析组间差异。多变量协方差分析也被用来检验混杂因素的影响。并在多重检验调整后进行随访两两比较。研究结果:IFT和ROCF测试结果显示,精神分裂症组明显高于MIP组。然而,MIP患者在这两项测试中的得分与正常对照组没有差异。关于CDT,在精神分裂症组和对照组之间观察到唯一的显著差异。结论:在其他研究结果得到证实的情况下,当精神分裂症和MIP难以鉴别时,可采用一些顶叶神经认知测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol Abstinence, Adherence, and Attitudes toward Disulfiram Treatment for Alcohol Dependence among Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Setting in North India. Characteristics of Waterpipe Smokers Who Are Willing to Quit: Population-Based Findings from Syria. Does Tramadol Exposure Have Unfavorable Effects on Hippocampus? A Review Study. Potential Involvement of Apelin/APJ System in Addiction and Neuroprotection Against Drugs of Abuse. Smartphone Usage and Addiction among Undergraduate Dental Students in South India: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1