Do reactive oxygen species damage or protect the heart in ischemia and reperfusion? Analysis on experimental and clinical data.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Biomedical Research Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.7555/JBR.36.20220261
Leonid N Maslov, Natalia V Naryzhnaya, Maria Sirotina, Alexandr V Mukhomedzyanov, Boris K Kurbatov, Alla A Boshchenko, Huijie Ma, Yi Zhang, Feng Fu, Jianming Pei, Viacheslav N Azev, Vladimir A Pereverzev
{"title":"Do reactive oxygen species damage or protect the heart in ischemia and reperfusion? Analysis on experimental and clinical data.","authors":"Leonid N Maslov,&nbsp;Natalia V Naryzhnaya,&nbsp;Maria Sirotina,&nbsp;Alexandr V Mukhomedzyanov,&nbsp;Boris K Kurbatov,&nbsp;Alla A Boshchenko,&nbsp;Huijie Ma,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Feng Fu,&nbsp;Jianming Pei,&nbsp;Viacheslav N Azev,&nbsp;Vladimir A Pereverzev","doi":"10.7555/JBR.36.20220261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in ischemic and reperfusion (I/R) injury of the heart has been discussed for more than 40 years. It has been demonstrated that reperfusion triggers a multiple increase in free radical generation in the isolated heart. Antioxidants were found to have the ability to mitigate I/R injury of the heart. However, it is unclear whether their cardioprotective effect truly depends on the decrease of ROS levels in myocardial tissues. Since high doses and high concentrations of antioxidants were experimentally used, it is highly likely that the cardioprotective effect of antioxidants depends on their interaction not only with free radicals but also with other molecules. It has been demonstrated that the antioxidant N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine or NDPH oxidase knockout abolished the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Consequently, there is evidence that ROS protect the heart against the I/R injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":15061,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Research","volume":"37 4","pages":"268-280"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387750/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7555/JBR.36.20220261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in ischemic and reperfusion (I/R) injury of the heart has been discussed for more than 40 years. It has been demonstrated that reperfusion triggers a multiple increase in free radical generation in the isolated heart. Antioxidants were found to have the ability to mitigate I/R injury of the heart. However, it is unclear whether their cardioprotective effect truly depends on the decrease of ROS levels in myocardial tissues. Since high doses and high concentrations of antioxidants were experimentally used, it is highly likely that the cardioprotective effect of antioxidants depends on their interaction not only with free radicals but also with other molecules. It has been demonstrated that the antioxidant N-2-mercaptopropionyl glycine or NDPH oxidase knockout abolished the cardioprotective effect of ischemic preconditioning. Consequently, there is evidence that ROS protect the heart against the I/R injury.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在缺血再灌注时活性氧是保护还是损害心脏?实验及临床数据分析。
活性氧(ROS)在心脏缺血和再灌注(I/R)损伤中的作用已经被讨论了40多年。已经证明,再灌注触发游离心脏中自由基生成的倍数增加。研究发现抗氧化剂具有减轻心脏I/R损伤的能力。然而,它们的心脏保护作用是否真的取决于心肌组织中ROS水平的降低尚不清楚。由于实验中使用了高剂量和高浓度的抗氧化剂,因此抗氧化剂的心脏保护作用很可能不仅取决于它们与自由基的相互作用,还取决于它们与其他分子的相互作用。研究表明,抗氧化剂n -2-巯基丙酰甘氨酸或NDPH氧化酶敲除可消除缺血预处理的心脏保护作用。因此,有证据表明活性氧可以保护心脏免受I/R损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Research
Journal of Biomedical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Effect of Compound Danshen Dripping Pills on cardiac function after acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A randomized trial. Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small cell lung cancer: A review of evidence. Author Correction: CircPVT1 promotes silica-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transformation by modulating the miR-497-5p/TCF3 axis. Chromosomal passenger complex-cyclin/CDK axis correlated with poor lung cancer prognosis. Hypothyroidism affects cholelithiasis causally: A two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1