Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications of Pedicled Latissimus Flap Breast Reconstruction.

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS Pub Date : 2023-08-02 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2045-8122
Emanuela C Peshel, Claire M McNary, Catherine Barkach, Elizabeth M Boudiab, Daniella Vega, Farid Nossoni, Kongkrit Chaiyasate, Jeremy M Powers
{"title":"Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications of Pedicled Latissimus Flap Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Emanuela C Peshel,&nbsp;Claire M McNary,&nbsp;Catherine Barkach,&nbsp;Elizabeth M Boudiab,&nbsp;Daniella Vega,&nbsp;Farid Nossoni,&nbsp;Kongkrit Chaiyasate,&nbsp;Jeremy M Powers","doi":"10.1055/a-2045-8122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is a reliable option for breast reconstruction. This is particularly true in patients with contraindications to abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. A systematic review of patient satisfaction and health related quality of life following LD breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q survey was conducted. The scope of the review was to determine the degree of patient satisfaction following the procedure and to examine how patient satisfaction from the pedicled LD flap compares to other breast reconstructive procedures. A literature search on BREAST-Q in LD flap reconstruction was performed. Only articles written in English and in published peer-reviewed journals were included. Studies with less than 20 patients in their sample and those with a follow-up period of less than 1 year were excluded. Five articles representing 331 patients were reviewed, including one case-control study and four retrospective cohort studies. Level of evidence was either III (4) or IV (1). The average age was 53 with average body mass index of 25. Most reconstructions were delayed (67%) and unilateral (88%), and most patients required radiation (79%). The average length of follow-up was 36 months, and the response rate was 75%. Overall, patients who underwent LD flap reconstruction reported favorable outcomes in satisfaction domains and quality of life domains with few complications. A meta-analysis also demonstrated higher satisfaction in LD flap without implants compared with LD flap with implants. Patient-reported outcomes following LD breast reconstruction compare favorably with other techniques of breast reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2045-8122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is a reliable option for breast reconstruction. This is particularly true in patients with contraindications to abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction. A systematic review of patient satisfaction and health related quality of life following LD breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q survey was conducted. The scope of the review was to determine the degree of patient satisfaction following the procedure and to examine how patient satisfaction from the pedicled LD flap compares to other breast reconstructive procedures. A literature search on BREAST-Q in LD flap reconstruction was performed. Only articles written in English and in published peer-reviewed journals were included. Studies with less than 20 patients in their sample and those with a follow-up period of less than 1 year were excluded. Five articles representing 331 patients were reviewed, including one case-control study and four retrospective cohort studies. Level of evidence was either III (4) or IV (1). The average age was 53 with average body mass index of 25. Most reconstructions were delayed (67%) and unilateral (88%), and most patients required radiation (79%). The average length of follow-up was 36 months, and the response rate was 75%. Overall, patients who underwent LD flap reconstruction reported favorable outcomes in satisfaction domains and quality of life domains with few complications. A meta-analysis also demonstrated higher satisfaction in LD flap without implants compared with LD flap with implants. Patient-reported outcomes following LD breast reconstruction compare favorably with other techniques of breast reconstruction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带蒂阔肌瓣乳房重建患者报告结果和并发症的系统评价。
背阔肌(LD)皮瓣是乳房重建的可靠选择。对于有腹部自体乳房重建禁忌症的患者尤其如此。使用BREAT-Q调查对LD乳房重建后的患者满意度和健康相关生活质量进行了系统回顾。审查的范围是确定手术后患者的满意度,并检查带蒂LD皮瓣与其他乳房重建手术相比患者的满意度。对BREAT-Q在LD皮瓣重建中的应用进行文献检索。只收录了用英文写的文章和发表在同行评审期刊上的文章。排除了样本中少于20名患者和随访期少于1年的患者的研究。对代表331名患者的5篇文章进行了综述,其中包括一项病例对照研究和四项回顾性队列研究。证据级别为III(4)或IV(1)。平均年龄53岁,平均体重指数25。大多数重建延迟(67%)和单侧重建(88%),大多数患者需要放疗(79%)。平均随访时间为36个月,有效率为75%。总体而言,接受LD皮瓣重建的患者在满意度和生活质量方面取得了良好的结果,并发症很少。荟萃分析还表明,与有植入物的LD皮瓣相比,无植入物的LD皮瓣的满意度更高。患者报告的LD乳房重建后的结果与其他乳房重建技术相比是有利的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
131
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Funducation"-The New Age of Learning, Intersection of Education, and Fun. Abdominal Wall Hernias Following High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy: Three Case Reports. Neglected Superior Ophthalmic Vein Enlargement before Delayed Symptom of Carotid-Cavernous Fistula in a Blowout Fracture: A Case Report and Literature Review. Speech Outcomes after Delayed Hard Palate Closure and Synchronous Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus and Palate. Fixation Techniques to Maintain Position for a Cross Leg Flap: Technical Tips and Algorithmic Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1