The psychosocial experience of traumatic birth in couples: an interpretative phenomenological study.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-13 DOI:10.1080/02646838.2023.2225073
Eva M Gregory, Robyn Maddern
{"title":"The psychosocial experience of traumatic birth in couples: an interpretative phenomenological study.","authors":"Eva M Gregory, Robyn Maddern","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2023.2225073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One-third of women report a psychologically traumatic event during birth; limited research exists on how couples experience and process self-reported traumatic birth.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine the lived experience and psychosocial impact of traumatic birth in couples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used to explore in-depth participants' lived experience during and after traumatic childbirth. Four couples were recruited, from women experiencing vaginal deliveries in the public hospital system in Australia during the past 5 years. Women and men were interviewed individually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three superordinate themes were identified: 'Compassionless care' (experiences of being dismissed, devalued and degraded by care providers), 'Violation and subjugation' (women's bodies and birthing experiences being violated) and 'Parenting after birth trauma' (challenges in caring for a newborn following trauma and recovery from trauma).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Couples described care providers' actions as a major contributing factor to trauma experiences. Couples contextualised care in terms of under-resourced wards and perceived women were treated as a means to an end. Women and men both described feeling fearful, distressed and devalued. Following birth trauma, individual cognitive factors, such as negative self-evaluations and avoidance of the trauma memory interacted with family system to shape trauma-related distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research would benefit from highlighting the systemic context in which compassionless care occurs, and the family system in which trauma is experienced and processed. Findings reinforce that psychosocial safety must be considered in addition to physical safety for both women and men in maternity care practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"121-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2023.2225073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One-third of women report a psychologically traumatic event during birth; limited research exists on how couples experience and process self-reported traumatic birth.

Aims and objectives: This study aimed to examine the lived experience and psychosocial impact of traumatic birth in couples.

Methods: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used to explore in-depth participants' lived experience during and after traumatic childbirth. Four couples were recruited, from women experiencing vaginal deliveries in the public hospital system in Australia during the past 5 years. Women and men were interviewed individually.

Results: Three superordinate themes were identified: 'Compassionless care' (experiences of being dismissed, devalued and degraded by care providers), 'Violation and subjugation' (women's bodies and birthing experiences being violated) and 'Parenting after birth trauma' (challenges in caring for a newborn following trauma and recovery from trauma).

Discussion: Couples described care providers' actions as a major contributing factor to trauma experiences. Couples contextualised care in terms of under-resourced wards and perceived women were treated as a means to an end. Women and men both described feeling fearful, distressed and devalued. Following birth trauma, individual cognitive factors, such as negative self-evaluations and avoidance of the trauma memory interacted with family system to shape trauma-related distress.

Conclusions: Future research would benefit from highlighting the systemic context in which compassionless care occurs, and the family system in which trauma is experienced and processed. Findings reinforce that psychosocial safety must be considered in addition to physical safety for both women and men in maternity care practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夫妻创伤性分娩的社会心理体验:解释性现象学研究。
背景:三分之一的妇女报告在分娩期间发生过心理创伤事件;关于夫妻如何经历和处理自我报告的创伤性分娩的研究有限。目的和目的:本研究旨在研究夫妻创伤性分娩的生活经历和心理社会影响。方法:采用解释性现象学分析方法,深入探讨创伤性分娩时和分娩后的生活体验。在过去的5年里,在澳大利亚公立医院系统进行阴道分娩的妇女中招募了四对夫妇。女性和男性分别接受了采访。结果:确定了三个上级主题:“无同情心的护理”(被护理提供者解雇,贬值和贬低的经历),“侵犯和征服”(妇女的身体和分娩经历被侵犯)和“出生创伤后的养育”(创伤后照顾新生儿和从创伤中恢复的挑战)。讨论:夫妻将护理人员的行为描述为创伤经历的主要促成因素。在资源不足的病房和被认为是妇女方面的夫妻情境护理被视为达到目的的手段。女性和男性都描述了恐惧、痛苦和被贬低的感觉。出生创伤后,个体认知因素,如消极的自我评价和对创伤记忆的回避,与家庭系统相互作用,形成创伤相关的痛苦。结论:未来的研究将受益于强调无同情心护理发生的系统背景,以及创伤经历和处理的家庭系统。调查结果强调,在产妇护理实践中,除了妇女和男子的人身安全外,还必须考虑社会心理安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
期刊最新文献
Transitional identities: challenges and coping mechanisms of Israeli gay fathers during assisted reproductive technologies. The surrogacy experience: a survey of psychosocial impacts on gestational carriers. Social support, temperament and previous prenatal loss interact to predict depression and anxiety during pregnancy. Development of negative and positive emotionality in irritable and nonirritable neonates. Perinatal experiences of Ukrainian women at the beginning of the war.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1