Protection Efficacy of the Infectious Laryngotracheitis (ILT) Serva CEO Vaccine Strain in Broiler Chickens Under Different Vaccination Coverage Conditions.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Avian Diseases Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00050
Awol M Assen, Priscilla F Gerber, Stephen W Walkden-Brown
{"title":"Protection Efficacy of the Infectious Laryngotracheitis (ILT) Serva CEO Vaccine Strain in Broiler Chickens Under Different Vaccination Coverage Conditions.","authors":"Awol M Assen,&nbsp;Priscilla F Gerber,&nbsp;Stephen W Walkden-Brown","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mass vaccination against infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) in drinking water can result in variable initial vaccine take. Partial initial vaccine coverage of 20% with an Australian ILT vaccine (A20) previously resulted in significant protection against virulent ILTV challenge. This follow-up study used the international Serva ILT vaccine strain in a factorial design testing four levels of vaccination coverage (0%, 10%, 20%, or 100% of chicks eye-drop vaccinated with the live vaccine at 7 days of age) and three levels of ILTV challenge (no challenge or challenge at 7 or 21 days postvaccination [DPV]). The increase in ILTV load in choanal cleft swabs detected by qPCR after challenge was significantly reduced by 20% and 100% but not by 10% vaccination coverage. Vaccination reduced weight gain in unchallenged birds. Daily weight gain of birds was not affected by ILTV challenge at 7 DPV in any group, but following challenge at 21 DPV, it was significantly reduced in unvaccinated and 10% vaccinated groups relative to 20% and 100% vaccinated groups. Vaccination of 20% of the chickens provided substantial but incomplete protection (protective index range 44%-70%) against the severity of clinical signs and mortality following challenge while 10% vaccination coverage provided limited or no protection. Clinical signs were more severe and appeared earlier following challenge at 21 DPV than at 7 DPV. Within the vaccination treatments, eye-drop-vaccinated birds were better protected than their in-contact cohorts. In conclusion, partial vaccination of 20%, but not 10% of chickens, induced substantial protection against subsequent challenge. However, the attendant risks of reduced protection against early challenge and the possible reversion to virulence of vaccine virus when transmitted to unvaccinated chickens make it essential that 100% initial vaccine take be the goal of mass vaccination programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":"67 2","pages":"160-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mass vaccination against infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) in drinking water can result in variable initial vaccine take. Partial initial vaccine coverage of 20% with an Australian ILT vaccine (A20) previously resulted in significant protection against virulent ILTV challenge. This follow-up study used the international Serva ILT vaccine strain in a factorial design testing four levels of vaccination coverage (0%, 10%, 20%, or 100% of chicks eye-drop vaccinated with the live vaccine at 7 days of age) and three levels of ILTV challenge (no challenge or challenge at 7 or 21 days postvaccination [DPV]). The increase in ILTV load in choanal cleft swabs detected by qPCR after challenge was significantly reduced by 20% and 100% but not by 10% vaccination coverage. Vaccination reduced weight gain in unchallenged birds. Daily weight gain of birds was not affected by ILTV challenge at 7 DPV in any group, but following challenge at 21 DPV, it was significantly reduced in unvaccinated and 10% vaccinated groups relative to 20% and 100% vaccinated groups. Vaccination of 20% of the chickens provided substantial but incomplete protection (protective index range 44%-70%) against the severity of clinical signs and mortality following challenge while 10% vaccination coverage provided limited or no protection. Clinical signs were more severe and appeared earlier following challenge at 21 DPV than at 7 DPV. Within the vaccination treatments, eye-drop-vaccinated birds were better protected than their in-contact cohorts. In conclusion, partial vaccination of 20%, but not 10% of chickens, induced substantial protection against subsequent challenge. However, the attendant risks of reduced protection against early challenge and the possible reversion to virulence of vaccine virus when transmitted to unvaccinated chickens make it essential that 100% initial vaccine take be the goal of mass vaccination programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同接种覆盖率条件下传染性喉气管炎(ILT) Serva CEO疫苗株对肉鸡的保护作用
在饮用水中大规模接种传染性喉气管炎病毒(ILTV)疫苗可导致不同的初始疫苗接种。澳大利亚ILT疫苗(A20)的部分初始疫苗覆盖率为20%,先前对毒性ILTV攻击产生了显着保护。这项后续研究采用国际Serva ILT疫苗株进行因子设计,测试了四个水平的疫苗接种覆盖率(7日龄时接种活疫苗的雏鸡滴眼液接种率为0%、10%、20%或100%)和三个水平的ILTV攻毒率(接种后7天或21天的攻毒率[DPV])。攻毒后,qPCR检测到的后肛裂拭子ILTV负荷的增加显著减少了20%和100%,但接种覆盖率没有减少10%。疫苗接种减少了未受挑战鸟类的体重增加。7 DPV时,任何组的日增重均未受到ILTV攻击的影响,但在21 DPV攻击后,未接种疫苗组和10%接种疫苗组的日增重显著低于20%和100%接种疫苗组。20%的鸡接种疫苗对感染后的严重临床症状和死亡提供了实质性但不完全的保护(保护指数范围为44%-70%),而10%的疫苗接种覆盖率提供了有限的保护或没有保护。与7 DPV相比,21 DPV的临床症状更严重,出现时间更早。在疫苗接种治疗中,接种眼药水的鸟类比接触的鸟类得到更好的保护。总之,20%的鸡接种部分疫苗,而不是10%的鸡接种部分疫苗,对后续的攻击产生了实质性的保护作用。然而,随之而来的风险是,对早期攻击的保护能力降低,以及疫苗病毒在传播给未接种疫苗的鸡时可能恢复毒性,因此,大规模疫苗接种规划的目标必须是100%的初始疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Avian Diseases
Avian Diseases 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
80
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Avian Diseases is an international journal dedicated to publishing original basic or clinical research of the highest quality from various disciplines including microbiology, immunology, pathology and epidemiology. Papers on avian diseases relevant to etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control are accepted. Manuscripts dealing with avian species other than poultry will be considered only if the subject is relevant to poultry health.
期刊最新文献
Limitations of the Inter-Unit Reliability: A Set of Practical Examples. Vaccination Against Poultry Parasites Inactivation of Three Subtypes of Influenza A Virus by a Commercial Device Using Ultraviolet Light and Ozone Licensing Requirements for Poultry Veterinary Biologics in the United States The Immunological Basis for Vaccination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1