Protection Efficacy of the Infectious Laryngotracheitis (ILT) Serva CEO Vaccine Strain in Broiler Chickens Under Different Vaccination Coverage Conditions.
Awol M Assen, Priscilla F Gerber, Stephen W Walkden-Brown
{"title":"Protection Efficacy of the Infectious Laryngotracheitis (ILT) Serva CEO Vaccine Strain in Broiler Chickens Under Different Vaccination Coverage Conditions.","authors":"Awol M Assen, Priscilla F Gerber, Stephen W Walkden-Brown","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mass vaccination against infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) in drinking water can result in variable initial vaccine take. Partial initial vaccine coverage of 20% with an Australian ILT vaccine (A20) previously resulted in significant protection against virulent ILTV challenge. This follow-up study used the international Serva ILT vaccine strain in a factorial design testing four levels of vaccination coverage (0%, 10%, 20%, or 100% of chicks eye-drop vaccinated with the live vaccine at 7 days of age) and three levels of ILTV challenge (no challenge or challenge at 7 or 21 days postvaccination [DPV]). The increase in ILTV load in choanal cleft swabs detected by qPCR after challenge was significantly reduced by 20% and 100% but not by 10% vaccination coverage. Vaccination reduced weight gain in unchallenged birds. Daily weight gain of birds was not affected by ILTV challenge at 7 DPV in any group, but following challenge at 21 DPV, it was significantly reduced in unvaccinated and 10% vaccinated groups relative to 20% and 100% vaccinated groups. Vaccination of 20% of the chickens provided substantial but incomplete protection (protective index range 44%-70%) against the severity of clinical signs and mortality following challenge while 10% vaccination coverage provided limited or no protection. Clinical signs were more severe and appeared earlier following challenge at 21 DPV than at 7 DPV. Within the vaccination treatments, eye-drop-vaccinated birds were better protected than their in-contact cohorts. In conclusion, partial vaccination of 20%, but not 10% of chickens, induced substantial protection against subsequent challenge. However, the attendant risks of reduced protection against early challenge and the possible reversion to virulence of vaccine virus when transmitted to unvaccinated chickens make it essential that 100% initial vaccine take be the goal of mass vaccination programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":"67 2","pages":"160-169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avian Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mass vaccination against infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) in drinking water can result in variable initial vaccine take. Partial initial vaccine coverage of 20% with an Australian ILT vaccine (A20) previously resulted in significant protection against virulent ILTV challenge. This follow-up study used the international Serva ILT vaccine strain in a factorial design testing four levels of vaccination coverage (0%, 10%, 20%, or 100% of chicks eye-drop vaccinated with the live vaccine at 7 days of age) and three levels of ILTV challenge (no challenge or challenge at 7 or 21 days postvaccination [DPV]). The increase in ILTV load in choanal cleft swabs detected by qPCR after challenge was significantly reduced by 20% and 100% but not by 10% vaccination coverage. Vaccination reduced weight gain in unchallenged birds. Daily weight gain of birds was not affected by ILTV challenge at 7 DPV in any group, but following challenge at 21 DPV, it was significantly reduced in unvaccinated and 10% vaccinated groups relative to 20% and 100% vaccinated groups. Vaccination of 20% of the chickens provided substantial but incomplete protection (protective index range 44%-70%) against the severity of clinical signs and mortality following challenge while 10% vaccination coverage provided limited or no protection. Clinical signs were more severe and appeared earlier following challenge at 21 DPV than at 7 DPV. Within the vaccination treatments, eye-drop-vaccinated birds were better protected than their in-contact cohorts. In conclusion, partial vaccination of 20%, but not 10% of chickens, induced substantial protection against subsequent challenge. However, the attendant risks of reduced protection against early challenge and the possible reversion to virulence of vaccine virus when transmitted to unvaccinated chickens make it essential that 100% initial vaccine take be the goal of mass vaccination programs.
期刊介绍:
Avian Diseases is an international journal dedicated to publishing original basic or clinical research of the highest quality from various disciplines including microbiology, immunology, pathology and epidemiology. Papers on avian diseases relevant to etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control are accepted. Manuscripts dealing with avian species other than poultry will be considered only if the subject is relevant to poultry health.