Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Agar Dilution Method for the Detection of Mupirocin Resistance in Staphylococcal Isolates from Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Laboratory Physicians Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1760672
Vijaya Shivanna, Venkatesha Dasegowda
{"title":"Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Agar Dilution Method for the Detection of Mupirocin Resistance in Staphylococcal Isolates from Skin and Soft Tissue Infections.","authors":"Vijaya Shivanna,&nbsp;Venkatesha Dasegowda","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1760672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims and Objectives</b>  Mupirocin is a widely used topical antibiotic for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. This has resulted in resistance leading to treatment failure. Hence, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of mupirocin resistance among staphylococcal isolates obtained from the skin and soft tissue infections. Also, comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution method in detecting mupirocin resistance was done. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology of a tertiary health care center in Karnataka from January to December, 2018. Clinical samples such as wound swabs, tissues, and pus were included in the study. All staphylococcal isolates were screened for mupirocin resistance using 5 µg and 200 µg discs for low-level (MuL) and high-level mupirocin resistance (MuH), respectively. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the agar dilution method. <b>Results</b>  Out of 100 staphylococcal isolates, 68 were <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and 32 were CoNS. MuH was detected in 11 isolates. MuH was more common in CoNS (10/11) compared with <i>S. aureus</i> (1/11). MuL was not found in the study. <b>Discussion</b>  In our study, 10 out of 11 mupirocin-resistant isolates were methicillin resistant, which is statistically significant ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05). The correlation between results of disc diffusion and MIC were appropriate in this study. <b>Conclusion</b>  Judicial prescription of mupirocin after knowing the susceptibility report should become the standard practice. Screening for mupirocin resistance can be done by disc diffusion in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","volume":"15 3","pages":"372-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/97/10-1055-s-0042-1760672.PMC10411145.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims and Objectives  Mupirocin is a widely used topical antibiotic for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. This has resulted in resistance leading to treatment failure. Hence, the present study aimed to determine the prevalence of mupirocin resistance among staphylococcal isolates obtained from the skin and soft tissue infections. Also, comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution method in detecting mupirocin resistance was done. Materials and Methods  This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology of a tertiary health care center in Karnataka from January to December, 2018. Clinical samples such as wound swabs, tissues, and pus were included in the study. All staphylococcal isolates were screened for mupirocin resistance using 5 µg and 200 µg discs for low-level (MuL) and high-level mupirocin resistance (MuH), respectively. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined using the agar dilution method. Results  Out of 100 staphylococcal isolates, 68 were Staphylococcus aureus and 32 were CoNS. MuH was detected in 11 isolates. MuH was more common in CoNS (10/11) compared with S. aureus (1/11). MuL was not found in the study. Discussion  In our study, 10 out of 11 mupirocin-resistant isolates were methicillin resistant, which is statistically significant ( p  < 0.05). The correlation between results of disc diffusion and MIC were appropriate in this study. Conclusion  Judicial prescription of mupirocin after knowing the susceptibility report should become the standard practice. Screening for mupirocin resistance can be done by disc diffusion in resource-limited settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圆盘扩散法和琼脂稀释法检测皮肤和软组织感染葡萄球菌分离株莫匹罗星耐药性的比较。
目的和目的莫匹罗星是一种广泛使用的局部抗生素,用于治疗皮肤和软组织感染。这导致耐药性,导致治疗失败。因此,本研究旨在确定从皮肤和软组织感染中获得的葡萄球菌分离株中莫匹罗星耐药性的流行情况。比较了圆盘扩散法和琼脂稀释法检测莫匹罗星耐药性的效果。材料与方法本横断面研究于2018年1 - 12月在卡纳塔克邦一家三级卫生保健中心微生物科进行。临床样本,如伤口拭子、组织和脓液也包括在研究中。对所有葡萄球菌分离株分别使用5µg和200µg碟片进行低水平(MuL)和高水平(MuH)的莫匹罗星耐药筛选。用琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。结果100株葡萄球菌中,金黄色葡萄球菌68株,金黄色葡萄球菌32株,其中11株检出MuH。与金黄色葡萄球菌(1/11)相比,MuH在con(10/11)中更为常见。本研究未发现MuL。在我们的研究中,11株莫匹罗星耐药菌株中有10株对甲氧西林耐药,差异有统计学意义(p)结论在了解药敏报告后,司法处方莫匹罗星应成为标准做法。在资源有限的情况下,可通过盘片扩散筛查莫匹罗星耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Journal of Laboratory Physicians MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short term antibiotic effects on gut microbiome in Indian preschoolers: A 16S rRNA analysis Burkholderia vietnamiensis Causing Bacteremia in Patients Suffering from B-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Case Series and Review of Literature Predicting Outcome in Organophosphorus Poisoning Using RBC Cholinesterase and Serum Cholinesterase Values: A Hospital-based Longitudinal Study Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Critical Result Notification Protocol of Biochemistry Laboratory at a Tertiary Care Hospital In response to the article; “Salivary IgA as a Surrogate Biomarker for Microbial Infections in Postoperative Patients Receiving Chemo-Radio-Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. J Lab Physicians. 2023;15(2):264-268”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1