Is Provider Training Level Associated with First Pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit?

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1731024
Chetna K Pande, Kelsey Stayer, Thomas Rappold, Madeleine Alvin, Keri Koszela, Sapna R Kudchadkar
{"title":"Is Provider Training Level Associated with First Pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit?","authors":"Chetna K Pande,&nbsp;Kelsey Stayer,&nbsp;Thomas Rappold,&nbsp;Madeleine Alvin,&nbsp;Keri Koszela,&nbsp;Sapna R Kudchadkar","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endotracheal intubation is a life-saving procedure in critically ill pediatric patients and a foundational skill for critical care trainees. Multiple intubation attempts are associated with increased adverse events and increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, we aimed to determine patient and provider factors associated with first pass success of endotracheal intubation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This prospective, single-center quality improvement study evaluated patient and provider factors associated with multiple intubation attempts in a tertiary care, academic, PICU from May 2017 to May 2018. The primary outcome was the number of tracheal intubation attempts. Predictive factors for first pass success were analyzed by using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A total of 98 intubation encounters in 75 patients were analyzed. Overall first pass success rate was 67% (66/98), and 7% (7/98) of encounters required three or more attempts. A Pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellow was the first laryngoscopist in 94% (92/98) of encounters with a first pass success rate of 67% (62/92). Age of patient, history of difficult airway, provider training level, previous intubation experience, urgency of intubation, and time of day were not predictive of first pass success. First pass success improved slightly with increasing fellow year (fellow year = 1, 66%; fellow year = 2, 68%; fellow year = 3, 69%) but was not statistically significant. We identified no intrinsic or extrinsic factors associated with first pass intubation success. At a time when PCCM fellow intubation experience is at risk of declining, PCCM fellows should continue to take the first attempt at most intubations in the PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":"12 3","pages":"180-187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411123/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1731024.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Endotracheal intubation is a life-saving procedure in critically ill pediatric patients and a foundational skill for critical care trainees. Multiple intubation attempts are associated with increased adverse events and increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, we aimed to determine patient and provider factors associated with first pass success of endotracheal intubation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This prospective, single-center quality improvement study evaluated patient and provider factors associated with multiple intubation attempts in a tertiary care, academic, PICU from May 2017 to May 2018. The primary outcome was the number of tracheal intubation attempts. Predictive factors for first pass success were analyzed by using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis. A total of 98 intubation encounters in 75 patients were analyzed. Overall first pass success rate was 67% (66/98), and 7% (7/98) of encounters required three or more attempts. A Pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM) fellow was the first laryngoscopist in 94% (92/98) of encounters with a first pass success rate of 67% (62/92). Age of patient, history of difficult airway, provider training level, previous intubation experience, urgency of intubation, and time of day were not predictive of first pass success. First pass success improved slightly with increasing fellow year (fellow year = 1, 66%; fellow year = 2, 68%; fellow year = 3, 69%) but was not statistically significant. We identified no intrinsic or extrinsic factors associated with first pass intubation success. At a time when PCCM fellow intubation experience is at risk of declining, PCCM fellows should continue to take the first attempt at most intubations in the PICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科重症监护病房医护人员培训水平与气管插管首次通过成功与否有关吗?
气管插管是危重儿科患者的救命程序,也是危重护理学员的基本技能。多次插管尝试与不良事件增加以及发病率和死亡率增加有关。因此,我们旨在确定与儿科重症监护病房(PICU)气管插管首次通过成功相关的患者和提供者因素。这项前瞻性、单中心质量改进研究评估了2017年5月至2018年5月期间三级护理、学术PICU中与多次插管尝试相关的患者和提供者因素。主要观察指标为气管插管次数。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析,分析了影响首次通过的预测因素。分析75例患者98次插管遭遇。总体的第一次通过成功率为67%(66/98),7%(7/98)的遭遇需要三次或更多次尝试。一名儿科重症医学(PCCM)研究员是94%(92/98)就诊的第一个喉镜医师,首次通过成功率为67%(62/92)。患者年龄、气道困难史、医护人员培训水平、既往插管经验、插管紧急程度和一天中的时间不能预测首次成功。第一次通过成功率随着同侪年的增加而略有提高(同侪年= 1.66%;同学会年= 2.68%;同侪年= 3.69%),但无统计学意义。我们没有发现与首次插管成功相关的内在或外在因素。在PCCM同行插管经验有下降风险的时候,PCCM同行应该继续在PICU进行大多数插管的第一次尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Contributing Reviewers in 2023. Retraction Note: The Effects of Quran Recitation on Sedation and Pain in Children. Retraction Note: The Spiritual Dimension of Death: A Mini Review. Erratum: A Clinical Mathematical Model Estimating Postoperative Urine Output in Children Underwent Cardiopulmonary By-pass for Congenital Heart Surgery A Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation of Social Determinant of Health Z Code Usage among Pediatric Patients with Critical Care Visits during Pediatric Critical Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1