Evaluation of education and counseling using social media tools after discharge in women who underwent episiotomy.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Care for Women International Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-11 DOI:10.1080/07399332.2023.2243259
Tuğba Öz, Zübeyde Ekşi Güloğlu
{"title":"Evaluation of education and counseling using social media tools after discharge in women who underwent episiotomy.","authors":"Tuğba Öz, Zübeyde Ekşi Güloğlu","doi":"10.1080/07399332.2023.2243259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effects of post-discharge education and counseling using social media tools on wound healing, pain status, and care and practices for women with episiotomy. The study was conducted experimentally with 60 women (30 experimental, 30 control) who had vaginal delivery with episiotomy in a public hospital in Istanbul. Data were collected using a data entry form and evaluations on the REEDA (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) scale, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), and Diagnostic Form for Episiotomy Care and challenges. In our study, training and counseling were given to the experimental group by making video calls <i>via</i> social media on the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 14th postnatal days (PP), and the results were evaluated without any training to the control group. SPSS program was used for data analysis. There was no difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of demographic and obstetric data. It was determined that the total scores of the experimental group on the REEDA scale on the 7th postnatal day (x¯ =2.167 ± 0.747) were statistically significantly lower than the total scores of the control group on the REEDA scale on 7th postnatal day (x¯ =3.100 ± 0.923) (<i>p</i> = 0.000 > 0.05). It was determined that the total scores of the experimental group on REEDA scale on the 14th postnatal day (x¯ =0.200 ± 0.407) were also statistically significantly lower than the total scores of the control group on REEDA scale on the 14th postnatal day. (x¯ =1.333 ± 0.844) (<i>p</i> = 0.000 > 0.05). The VAS DS scores of the experimental group on 3rd (x¯ =4.733 ± 0.907) and the 5th (x¯ =3.267 ± 0.691) postnatal day were statistically significantly lower than the VAS DS scores of the control group on 3rd (x¯ =5.267 ± 0.944) and 5th (x¯ =3.933 ± 0.944) (<i>p</i> = 0.003 > 0.05) postnatal day. In the light of this information, it was found that scores on REEDA scale were lower and pain experiences were significantly less in the group that received education and counseling with social media tools after discharge in women who underwent episiotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47836,"journal":{"name":"Health Care for Women International","volume":" ","pages":"910-928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care for Women International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2023.2243259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effects of post-discharge education and counseling using social media tools on wound healing, pain status, and care and practices for women with episiotomy. The study was conducted experimentally with 60 women (30 experimental, 30 control) who had vaginal delivery with episiotomy in a public hospital in Istanbul. Data were collected using a data entry form and evaluations on the REEDA (Redness, Edema, Ecchymosis, Discharge, Approximation) scale, VAS (Visual Analogue Scale), and Diagnostic Form for Episiotomy Care and challenges. In our study, training and counseling were given to the experimental group by making video calls via social media on the 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 14th postnatal days (PP), and the results were evaluated without any training to the control group. SPSS program was used for data analysis. There was no difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of demographic and obstetric data. It was determined that the total scores of the experimental group on the REEDA scale on the 7th postnatal day (x¯ =2.167 ± 0.747) were statistically significantly lower than the total scores of the control group on the REEDA scale on 7th postnatal day (x¯ =3.100 ± 0.923) (p = 0.000 > 0.05). It was determined that the total scores of the experimental group on REEDA scale on the 14th postnatal day (x¯ =0.200 ± 0.407) were also statistically significantly lower than the total scores of the control group on REEDA scale on the 14th postnatal day. (x¯ =1.333 ± 0.844) (p = 0.000 > 0.05). The VAS DS scores of the experimental group on 3rd (x¯ =4.733 ± 0.907) and the 5th (x¯ =3.267 ± 0.691) postnatal day were statistically significantly lower than the VAS DS scores of the control group on 3rd (x¯ =5.267 ± 0.944) and 5th (x¯ =3.933 ± 0.944) (p = 0.003 > 0.05) postnatal day. In the light of this information, it was found that scores on REEDA scale were lower and pain experiences were significantly less in the group that received education and counseling with social media tools after discharge in women who underwent episiotomy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受外阴切开术的妇女出院后使用社交媒体工具进行教育和咨询的评估。
本研究旨在评估使用社交媒体工具进行出院后教育和咨询对伤口愈合、疼痛状况以及外阴切开术产妇的护理和实践的影响。该研究对伊斯坦布尔一家公立医院的 60 名经阴道分娩并行外阴切开术的产妇(30 名实验组,30 名对照组)进行了实验。收集数据时使用了数据输入表和 REEDA(发红、水肿、瘀斑、脱落、近似)量表、VAS(视觉模拟量表)以及外阴切开术护理和挑战诊断表。在我们的研究中,实验组在产后第 3 天、第 5 天、第 7 天和第 14 天(PP)通过社交媒体进行视频通话,对实验组进行培训和辅导,对照组在没有任何培训的情况下对结果进行评估。数据分析采用 SPSS 程序。实验组和对照组在人口统计学和产科数据方面没有差异。实验组产后第 7 天的 REEDA 量表总分(x¯ =2.167 ± 0.747)显著低于对照组产后第 7 天的 REEDA 量表总分(x¯ =3.100 ± 0.923),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.000 > 0.05)。实验组在产后第 14 天的 REEDA 量表总分(x¯ =0.200 ± 0.407)也显著低于对照组在产后第 14 天的 REEDA 量表总分,差异有统计学意义(x¯ =1.333 ± 0.407)。(x¯ =1.333 ± 0.844) (p = 0.000 > 0.05)。实验组在产后第 3 天(x¯ =4.733 ± 0.907)和第 5 天(x¯ =3.267 ± 0.691)的 VAS DS 评分明显低于对照组在产后第 3 天(x¯ =5.267 ± 0.944)和第 5 天(x¯ =3.933 ± 0.944)的 VAS DS 评分(p = 0.003 > 0.05)。根据这些信息,我们发现在接受外阴切开术的产妇中,出院后接受社交媒体工具教育和咨询的组的REEDA量表得分更低,疼痛体验也明显更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Health Care for Women International is a critically acclaimed, international publication that provides a unique interdisciplinary approach to health care and related topics that concern women around the globe. Published twelve times a year, Health Care for Women International includes the newest research, theories, and issues in the fields of public health, social science, health care practice, and health care policy. Scholars and practitioners address topics such as cultural differences, alternative lifestyles, domestic violence, public health issues associated with the aging of the population, maternal morbidity and mortality, infectious diseases, and a host of other gender-based ethical issues. The editor also encourages discussion topics, inviting readers to comment on articles that focus on specific aspects of health issue for women.
期刊最新文献
Glove changing reduced wound-related complications following cesarean section in Vietnam. How do marital conflicts influence post-traumatic growth among infertile women? The moderation role of coping strategies. Gender differences in longitudinal association of fear of falling with grip strength and depressive symptoms in older adults. Work-family conflict, role clarity, and psychological depression among female social workers: The moderating role of social support. Protective factors against suicide attempt and violence against women in Azerbaijan: Reports from women with lived experience and mental health providers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1