The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to reduce body weight and food cravings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1111/cob.12611
Yousef Abdullah Alhindi, Najat Khalifa, Waleed Al-Khyatt, Iskandar Idris
{"title":"The use of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques to reduce body weight and food cravings: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yousef Abdullah Alhindi,&nbsp;Najat Khalifa,&nbsp;Waleed Al-Khyatt,&nbsp;Iskandar Idris","doi":"10.1111/cob.12611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several studies demonstrated non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are safe and simple techniques that can reduce body weight, food cravings, and food consumption in patients with obesity. However, a systematic to evaluate the efficacy of active NIBS versus sham stimulation in reducing body weight and food cravings in patients with obesity is not available. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Control Trial between January 1990 and February 2022. Mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcome variables with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to examine the effects of NIBS on body weight and body mass index (BMI), whereas the hedges's <i>g</i> test was used to measure the effects on food craving. Nineteen RCTs involving 571 participants were included in this study. Active neurostimulation (TMS and tDCS) was significantly more likely than sham stimulation to reduce body weight (TMS: −3.29 kg, 95% CI [−5.32, −1.26]; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 48%; <i>p</i> &lt; .001; tDCS: −0.82 kg, 95% CI [−1.01, −0.62]; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; <i>p</i> = .00) and BMI (TMS: −0.74, 95% CI [−1.17, −0.31]; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0% <i>p</i> = .00; tDCS: MD = −0.55, 95% CI [−2.32, 1.21]; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0% <i>p</i> = .54) as well as food cravings (TMS: <i>g</i> = −0.91, 95% CI [−1.68, −0.14]; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 88 <i>p</i> = .00; tDCS: <i>g</i> = −0.32, 95% CI [−0.62, −0.02]; <i>p</i> = .04). Compared with sham stimulation, our findings indicate that active NIBS can significantly help to reduce body weight and food cravings. Hence, these novel techniques may be used as primary or adjunct tools in treating patients with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cob.12611","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies demonstrated non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are safe and simple techniques that can reduce body weight, food cravings, and food consumption in patients with obesity. However, a systematic to evaluate the efficacy of active NIBS versus sham stimulation in reducing body weight and food cravings in patients with obesity is not available. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Control Trial between January 1990 and February 2022. Mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcome variables with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to examine the effects of NIBS on body weight and body mass index (BMI), whereas the hedges's g test was used to measure the effects on food craving. Nineteen RCTs involving 571 participants were included in this study. Active neurostimulation (TMS and tDCS) was significantly more likely than sham stimulation to reduce body weight (TMS: −3.29 kg, 95% CI [−5.32, −1.26]; I2 = 48%; p < .001; tDCS: −0.82 kg, 95% CI [−1.01, −0.62]; I2 = 0.0%; p = .00) and BMI (TMS: −0.74, 95% CI [−1.17, −0.31]; I2 = 0% p = .00; tDCS: MD = −0.55, 95% CI [−2.32, 1.21]; I2 = 0% p = .54) as well as food cravings (TMS: g = −0.91, 95% CI [−1.68, −0.14]; I2 = 88 p = .00; tDCS: g = −0.32, 95% CI [−0.62, −0.02]; p = .04). Compared with sham stimulation, our findings indicate that active NIBS can significantly help to reduce body weight and food cravings. Hence, these novel techniques may be used as primary or adjunct tools in treating patients with obesity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用非侵入性脑刺激技术减少体重和对食物的渴望:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
一些研究表明,非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)技术,如经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅磁刺激(TMS)是安全且简单的技术,可以减少肥胖患者的体重,减少对食物的渴望和食物消耗。然而,尚无系统评估主动NIBS与假刺激在减少肥胖患者体重和食物渴望方面的效果。我们对1990年1月至2022年2月期间使用PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE和Cochrane Central Register of Control Trial进行的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。使用95%置信区间(95% ci)的连续结局变量的平均差异(md)来检查NIBS对体重和体重指数(BMI)的影响,而使用hedges g检验来测量对食物渴望的影响。本研究共纳入19项随机对照试验,涉及571名受试者。主动神经刺激(TMS和tDCS)比假刺激更有可能减轻体重(TMS:−3.29 kg, 95% CI[−5.32,−1.26];i2 = 48%;p < .001;tDCS:−0.82 kg, 95% CI[−1.01,−0.62];i2 = 0.0%;p =美元)和BMI (TMS:−0.74,95%可信区间(−1.17−0.31);I2 = 0% p = .00;tDCS: MD = - 0.55, 95% CI [- 2.32, 1.21];I2 = 0% p = 54)以及食物的欲望(TMS: g =−0.91,95%可信区间(−1.68−0.14);I2 = 88 p = .00;tDCS: g =−0.32,95% CI[−0.62,−0.02];p = .04)。与假刺激相比,我们的研究结果表明,活跃的NIBS可以显著帮助减少体重和对食物的渴望。因此,这些新技术可以作为治疗肥胖患者的主要或辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
期刊最新文献
Effect of the National Enhanced Service for weight management on the content of annual review consultations for patients living with obesity and hypertension and/or diabetes. Issue Information A cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of family-centred obesity management program in primary care settings: A study protocol. Effect of interdisciplinary obesity care on metabolic markers and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes in a rural setting: A randomised controlled trial. Improving obesity management: Insights from the ACTION Switzerland survey of people with obesity, physicians and dietitians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1