Ideal Nasal Preferences: A Quantitative Investigation with 3D Imaging in the Iranian Population.

IF 1.3 Q3 SURGERY Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS Pub Date : 2023-08-02 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2091-6820
Kiarash Tavakoli, Amir K Sazgar, Arman Hasanzade, Amir A Sazgar
{"title":"Ideal Nasal Preferences: A Quantitative Investigation with 3D Imaging in the Iranian Population.","authors":"Kiarash Tavakoli,&nbsp;Amir K Sazgar,&nbsp;Arman Hasanzade,&nbsp;Amir A Sazgar","doi":"10.1055/a-2091-6820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Though in facial plastic surgery, the ideal nasal characteristics are defined by average European-American facial features known as neoclassical cannons, many ethnicities do not perceive these characteristics as suitable. <b>Methods</b>  To investigate the preferences for nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, dorsal height, alar width, and nasal tip projection, manipulated pictures of one male and one female model were shown to 203 volunteer patients from a tertiary university hospital's facial plastic clinic. <b>Results</b>  The most aesthetically preferred nasofrontal angles were 137.64 ± 4.20 degrees for males and 133.55 ± 4.53 degrees for females. Acute nasofrontal angles were more desirable in participants aged 25 to 44. The most preferred nasolabial angles were 107.56 ± 5.20 degrees and 98.92 ± 4.88 degrees, respectively. Volunteers aged 19 to 24 preferred more acute male nasolabial angles. A straight dorsum was the most desirable in both genders (0.03 ± 0.78 and 0.26 ± 0.75 mm, respectively). The ideal male and female alar widths were -0.51 ± 2.26 and -1.09 ± 2.18 mm, respectively. More 45- to 64-year-old volunteers preferred alar widths equal to intercanthal distance. The ideal female and male tip projections were 0.57 ± 0.01 and 0.56 ± 0.01, respectively. <b>Conclusion</b>  Results indicate that the general Iranian patients prefer thinner female noses with wider nasofrontal angles for both genders. However, the ideal nasolabial angles, dorsal heights, and tip projections were consistent with the neoclassical cannons. Besides ethnic differences, the trend of nasal beauty is also affected by gender, age, and prior history of aesthetic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":47543,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10411228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery-APS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2091-6820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Though in facial plastic surgery, the ideal nasal characteristics are defined by average European-American facial features known as neoclassical cannons, many ethnicities do not perceive these characteristics as suitable. Methods  To investigate the preferences for nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle, dorsal height, alar width, and nasal tip projection, manipulated pictures of one male and one female model were shown to 203 volunteer patients from a tertiary university hospital's facial plastic clinic. Results  The most aesthetically preferred nasofrontal angles were 137.64 ± 4.20 degrees for males and 133.55 ± 4.53 degrees for females. Acute nasofrontal angles were more desirable in participants aged 25 to 44. The most preferred nasolabial angles were 107.56 ± 5.20 degrees and 98.92 ± 4.88 degrees, respectively. Volunteers aged 19 to 24 preferred more acute male nasolabial angles. A straight dorsum was the most desirable in both genders (0.03 ± 0.78 and 0.26 ± 0.75 mm, respectively). The ideal male and female alar widths were -0.51 ± 2.26 and -1.09 ± 2.18 mm, respectively. More 45- to 64-year-old volunteers preferred alar widths equal to intercanthal distance. The ideal female and male tip projections were 0.57 ± 0.01 and 0.56 ± 0.01, respectively. Conclusion  Results indicate that the general Iranian patients prefer thinner female noses with wider nasofrontal angles for both genders. However, the ideal nasolabial angles, dorsal heights, and tip projections were consistent with the neoclassical cannons. Besides ethnic differences, the trend of nasal beauty is also affected by gender, age, and prior history of aesthetic surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理想的鼻腔偏好:对伊朗人群进行的3D成像定量调查。
背景 尽管在面部整形手术中,理想的鼻腔特征是由被称为新古典大炮的普通欧美面部特征定义的,但许多种族并不认为这些特征合适。方法 为了研究对鼻额角、鼻唇角、背高、鼻翼宽度和鼻尖投影的偏好,向来自一所三级大学医院面部整形诊所的203名志愿者患者展示了一名男性和一名女性模特的操纵照片。后果 审美上最喜欢的鼻额角是137.64 ± 4.20 男性学位和133.55 ± 4.53 女性的学位。急性鼻额角在25至44岁的参与者中更为理想。最理想的鼻唇角是107.56 ± 5.20 度和98.92 ± 4.88 度。19至24岁的志愿者更喜欢男性鼻唇角更尖锐。直背在两性中都是最理想的(0.03 ± 0.78和0.26 ± 0.75 mm)。理想的男性和女性鼻翼宽度为-0.51 ± 2.26和-1.09 ± 2.18 mm。更多的45至64岁的志愿者更喜欢与花间距离相等的鼻翼宽度。理想的雌性和雄性尖端投影为0.57 ± 0.01和0.56 ± 分别为0.01。结论 结果表明,伊朗普通患者更喜欢女性鼻子更细、鼻额角更宽。然而,理想的鼻唇角、背部高度和尖端投影与新古典大炮一致。除了种族差异外,鼻腔美容的趋势还受到性别、年龄和既往美容手术史的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
131
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Funducation"-The New Age of Learning, Intersection of Education, and Fun. Abdominal Wall Hernias Following High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy: Three Case Reports. Neglected Superior Ophthalmic Vein Enlargement before Delayed Symptom of Carotid-Cavernous Fistula in a Blowout Fracture: A Case Report and Literature Review. Speech Outcomes after Delayed Hard Palate Closure and Synchronous Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip, Alveolus and Palate. Fixation Techniques to Maintain Position for a Cross Leg Flap: Technical Tips and Algorithmic Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1