Development and Psychometric Validation of the Sexual Fantasies and Behaviors Inventory

Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.31234/OSF.IO/DGS3C
Ashley Brown, E. Barker, Q. Rahman
{"title":"Development and Psychometric Validation of the Sexual Fantasies and Behaviors Inventory","authors":"Ashley Brown, E. Barker, Q. Rahman","doi":"10.31234/OSF.IO/DGS3C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, no measures of sexual fantasies and behavior have been tested using modern structural equation modelling techniques. A total of 4,280 adults from the US, UK, Canada, and Ireland completed a measure of diverse (paraphilic and normophilic) sexual fantasies and behaviors. Data were randomly split in half for a two-part analysis. First, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to reduce the item pool and determine general factor structure. Second, we tested several models using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM). These were followed by tests of measurement invariance (based on sex and sexual orientation) and criterion validity. For both the fantasies and behaviors, Bifactor ESEMs were the most appropriate models. Similar specific factors emerged: 1) normophilia, 2) rough sex, 3) interest of intrusion, 4) assuming power, and 5) relinquishing power. Findings suggest that sexual interests show a hierarchical measurement structure. Males and non-heterosexuals had higher general fantasy scores; females and non-heterosexuals had higher general behavior scores. Heterosexuals generally scored lower than non-heterosexuals. Fantasy and behavior scores were positively related to Dark Triad Traits and sociosexuality; there was little to no relationship with depression and anxiety. Results support the psychometric validation of the Sexual Fantasies and Behaviors Inventory.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/OSF.IO/DGS3C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

To date, no measures of sexual fantasies and behavior have been tested using modern structural equation modelling techniques. A total of 4,280 adults from the US, UK, Canada, and Ireland completed a measure of diverse (paraphilic and normophilic) sexual fantasies and behaviors. Data were randomly split in half for a two-part analysis. First, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to reduce the item pool and determine general factor structure. Second, we tested several models using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM). These were followed by tests of measurement invariance (based on sex and sexual orientation) and criterion validity. For both the fantasies and behaviors, Bifactor ESEMs were the most appropriate models. Similar specific factors emerged: 1) normophilia, 2) rough sex, 3) interest of intrusion, 4) assuming power, and 5) relinquishing power. Findings suggest that sexual interests show a hierarchical measurement structure. Males and non-heterosexuals had higher general fantasy scores; females and non-heterosexuals had higher general behavior scores. Heterosexuals generally scored lower than non-heterosexuals. Fantasy and behavior scores were positively related to Dark Triad Traits and sociosexuality; there was little to no relationship with depression and anxiety. Results support the psychometric validation of the Sexual Fantasies and Behaviors Inventory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
性幻想与行为量表的编制与心理计量学验证
迄今为止,还没有使用现代结构方程建模技术测试性幻想和性行为的测量方法。共有4280名来自美国、英国、加拿大和爱尔兰的成年人完成了一项测量不同的性幻想和性行为的测试。数据被随机分成两部分进行分析。首先进行探索性因子分析(EFA),减少项目池,确定总体因子结构。其次,我们使用验证性因子分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)测试了几个模型。随后进行了测量不变性(基于性别和性取向)和标准有效性的测试。对于幻想和行为,双因子esem是最合适的模型。类似的具体因素出现了:1)normophilia, 2)粗暴的性行为,3)入侵的兴趣,4)获取权力,5)放弃权力。研究结果表明,性兴趣表现出一种等级测量结构。男性和非异性恋者的总体幻想得分更高;女性和非异性恋者的一般行为得分更高。异性恋者的得分普遍低于非异性恋者。幻想和行为得分与黑暗三联征和社会性行为呈正相关;这与抑郁和焦虑几乎没有关系。结果支持性幻想与行为量表的心理计量学验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1