Multiple Brain Metastases Radiosurgery with CyberKnife Device: Dosimetric Comparison between Fixed/Iris and Multileaf Collimator Plans.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_82_22
Anna Ianiro, Erminia Infusino, Marco D'Andrea, Laura Marucci, Alessia Farneti, Francesca Sperati, Bartolomeo Cassano, Sara Ungania, Antonella Soriani
{"title":"Multiple Brain Metastases Radiosurgery with CyberKnife Device: Dosimetric Comparison between Fixed/Iris and Multileaf Collimator Plans.","authors":"Anna Ianiro,&nbsp;Erminia Infusino,&nbsp;Marco D'Andrea,&nbsp;Laura Marucci,&nbsp;Alessia Farneti,&nbsp;Francesca Sperati,&nbsp;Bartolomeo Cassano,&nbsp;Sara Ungania,&nbsp;Antonella Soriani","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_82_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In our institution, stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases is performed with the CyberKnife® (CK) device, using fixed/Iris collimators. In this study, nineteen fixed/Iris plans were recalculated with the multileaf collimator (MLC), to assess if it is possible to produce plans with comparable dosimetric overall quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For consistent comparisons, MLC plans were re-optimized and re-normalized in order to achieve the same minimum dose for the total planning target volume (PTV<sub>tot</sub>). Conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI) and dose gradient index (DGI) metrics were evaluated. The dose to the brain was evaluated as the volume receiving 12 Gy (V<sub>12</sub>) and as the integral dose (ID). The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for brain radionecrosis was calculated as a function of V<sub>12</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The reoptimized plans were reviewed by the radiation oncologist and were found clinically acceptable according to the The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group-101 protocol. However, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly higher CN (+8.6%), HI (+2.2%), and DGI (+44.0%) values, and significantly lower ID values (-35.9%). For PTV<sub>tot</sub> less than the median value of 2.58cc, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly lower NTCP values. On the other side, MLC plans provided significantly lower treatment times (-18.4%), number of monitor units (-33.3%), beams (-46.0%) and nodes (-21.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CK-MLC plans for the stereotactic treatment of brain multi metastases could provide an important advantage in terms of treatment duration. However, to contain the increased risk for brain radionecrosis, it could be useful to calculate MLC plans only for patients with large PTV<sub>tot</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"48 2","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/cd/JMP-48-120.PMC10419749.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_82_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In our institution, stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases is performed with the CyberKnife® (CK) device, using fixed/Iris collimators. In this study, nineteen fixed/Iris plans were recalculated with the multileaf collimator (MLC), to assess if it is possible to produce plans with comparable dosimetric overall quality.

Materials and methods: For consistent comparisons, MLC plans were re-optimized and re-normalized in order to achieve the same minimum dose for the total planning target volume (PTVtot). Conformation number (CN), homogeneity index (HI) and dose gradient index (DGI) metrics were evaluated. The dose to the brain was evaluated as the volume receiving 12 Gy (V12) and as the integral dose (ID). The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for brain radionecrosis was calculated as a function of V12.

Results: The reoptimized plans were reviewed by the radiation oncologist and were found clinically acceptable according to the The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group-101 protocol. However, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly higher CN (+8.6%), HI (+2.2%), and DGI (+44.0%) values, and significantly lower ID values (-35.9%). For PTVtot less than the median value of 2.58cc, fixed/Iris plans provided significantly lower NTCP values. On the other side, MLC plans provided significantly lower treatment times (-18.4%), number of monitor units (-33.3%), beams (-46.0%) and nodes (-21.3%).

Conclusions: CK-MLC plans for the stereotactic treatment of brain multi metastases could provide an important advantage in terms of treatment duration. However, to contain the increased risk for brain radionecrosis, it could be useful to calculate MLC plans only for patients with large PTVtot.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CyberKnife装置的多发性脑转移放射外科:固定/虹膜和多叶准直器方案的剂量比较。
目的:在我们的机构中,多发性脑转移瘤的立体定向放射外科手术是使用CyberKnife®(CK)设备,使用固定/虹膜准直器进行的。在这项研究中,使用多叶准直器(MLC)重新计算了19个固定/Iris计划,以评估是否有可能产生具有可比剂量测量总体质量的计划。材料和方法:为了进行一致的比较,MLC计划被重新优化和标准化,以实现总计划目标体积(PTVtot)的相同最小剂量。对构象数(CN)、同质性指数(HI)和剂量梯度指数(DGI)指标进行了评估。大脑的剂量被评估为接受12Gy(V12)的体积和积分剂量(ID)。脑放射性坏死的正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)是作为V12的函数计算的。结果:放射肿瘤学家对重新优化的计划进行了审查,并根据美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)任务组-101协议发现其临床可接受。然而,固定/Iris计划提供了显著更高的CN(+8.6%)、HI(+2.2%)和DGI(+44.0%)值,以及显著更低的ID值(-35.9%)。对于小于2.58cc中值的PTVtot,固定/Iis计划提供了明显更低的NTCP值。另一方面,MLC方案的治疗时间(-18.4%)、监测单元数(-33.3%)、波束数(-46.0%)和淋巴结数(-21.3%)显著降低。然而,为了控制脑放射性坏死风险的增加,仅对PTVtot大的患者计算MLC计划可能是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Segmentation-based Automated Calculation of Patient Size and Size-specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans. A Study on Radiation Level at the Treatment Plane Due to Induced Activity in Linear Accelerator Head. Advancements and Applications of Three-dimensional Printing Technology in Surgery. Agar-based Phantom for Evaluating Targeting of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Systems for Breast Ablation. An Analysis of Radiotherapy Machine Requirements in India: Impact of the Pandemic and Regional Disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1