Prevalence of anxiety and depression of health care workers during COVID-19 - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Q2 Medicine Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-27 DOI:10.15386/mpr-2579
Christos Sialakis, Panagiota Antoniou Sialaki, Aikaterini Frantzana, Christos Iliadis, Peter Ouzounakis, Labrini Kourkouta
{"title":"Prevalence of anxiety and depression of health care workers during COVID-19 - a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Christos Sialakis, Panagiota Antoniou Sialaki, Aikaterini Frantzana, Christos Iliadis, Peter Ouzounakis, Labrini Kourkouta","doi":"10.15386/mpr-2579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, the workload of healthcare workers managing the disease, increased significantly. The objective of this review is to determine the anxiety and depression prevalence among healthcare workers during the pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched systematically the literature in five electronic databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Cochrane COVID-19 study register. The last online research was performed in May 2022. We included only cross-sectional studies and performed a meta-analysis of pooled prevalence. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot and Egger's and Begg's tests. A random effect was applied and heterogenicity I2 was calculated. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this review, we included 14 cross-sectional studies comprising 7780 healthcare workers. Participants were from the whole spectrum of healthcare workers. The pooled prevalence of depression was 33.8% (95% CI: 24.6 - 43.6), heterogenicity I<sup>2</sup>: 98.69%. The pooled prevalence of anxiety was 41.3% (95% CI: 30.2 - 52.9), heterogenicity I<sup>2</sup>: 99.01%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-third of healthcare workers suffered from depression, and more than one-third suffered from anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased measures of surveillance of mental health should have been taken, as well as the support of healthcare workers running a high risk of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":18438,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","volume":"96 3","pages":"246-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7f/b0/cm-96-246.PMC10419692.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Pharmacy Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-2579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the workload of healthcare workers managing the disease, increased significantly. The objective of this review is to determine the anxiety and depression prevalence among healthcare workers during the pandemic period.

Methods: We searched systematically the literature in five electronic databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Cochrane COVID-19 study register. The last online research was performed in May 2022. We included only cross-sectional studies and performed a meta-analysis of pooled prevalence. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot and Egger's and Begg's tests. A random effect was applied and heterogenicity I2 was calculated. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool.

Results: In this review, we included 14 cross-sectional studies comprising 7780 healthcare workers. Participants were from the whole spectrum of healthcare workers. The pooled prevalence of depression was 33.8% (95% CI: 24.6 - 43.6), heterogenicity I2: 98.69%. The pooled prevalence of anxiety was 41.3% (95% CI: 30.2 - 52.9), heterogenicity I2: 99.01%.

Conclusion: One-third of healthcare workers suffered from depression, and more than one-third suffered from anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. Increased measures of surveillance of mental health should have been taken, as well as the support of healthcare workers running a high risk of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 期间医护人员的焦虑和抑郁流行率--系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导言:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医护人员处理疾病的工作量大幅增加。本综述旨在确定大流行期间医护人员的焦虑和抑郁发生率:我们在 PubMed、CINAHL、ScienceDirect、MEDLINE 和 Cochrane COVID-19 研究登记册等五个电子数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。最后一次在线研究于 2022 年 5 月进行。我们仅纳入了横断面研究,并对汇总的患病率进行了荟萃分析。通过漏斗图、Egger 检验和 Begg 检验评估了发表偏倚。采用随机效应并计算异质性 I2。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的工具对纳入研究进行了质量评估:在本综述中,我们纳入了 14 项横断面研究,共有 7780 名医护人员参与。参与研究的人员来自所有医护人员。抑郁症的合并患病率为 33.8%(95% CI:24.6 - 43.6),异质性 I2:98.69%。焦虑症的合计患病率为 41.3%(95% CI:30.2 - 52.9),异质性 I2:99.01%:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,三分之一的医护人员患有抑郁症,超过三分之一的医护人员患有焦虑症。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,本应采取更多措施监测心理健康,并为面临心理困扰高风险的医护人员提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports
Medicine and Pharmacy Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
5-Azacytidine treatment inhibits the development of lung cancer models via epigenetic reprogramming and activation of cellular pathways with anti-tumor activity. Artificial Intelligence and medical specialties: support or substitution? Clonal distribution and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolated strains in Chania and Heraklion, Crete. Exploring anesthesia-related complications in pediatric neurosurgery: a comparative analysis of the sitting and park-bench positions. Genetic and clinical factors influencing CF-associated liver disease: the impact of SERPINA1 variants and CFTR genotypes in Romanian pediatric cystic fibrosis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1