Filiberto Reyes-Villanueva, Javier A Garza-Hernández, Annabel F V Howard, Mario A Rodríguez-Pérez
{"title":"A generalized Poisson model to predict host-seeking female <i>Aedes aegypti</i> marked by dusted <i>Metarhizium anisopliae</i>-exposed males.","authors":"Filiberto Reyes-Villanueva, Javier A Garza-Hernández, Annabel F V Howard, Mario A Rodríguez-Pérez","doi":"10.52707/1081-1710-48.1.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed a biological control method directed toward <i>Aedes aegypti</i> using the release of <i>Metarhizium anisopliae</i>-contaminated males to spread the fungus to wild females. A generalized Poisson model was used to relate <i>Ae. aegypti</i> marked females (MKF) to <i>M. anisopliae</i>-exposed males (FEM). In a mark-recapture parallel arm trial, FEM release was a better predictor than unexposed male (UM) releases to forecast MKF by FEM. Total females (TF), marked males (MKM), and wild males (WM) as predictors were counted in human-landings in 15 households treated with 40 FEM each, vs 40 UM released/household/week in 15 households for eight weeks. Fit of MKF to standard, generalized Poisson (GP), and negative binomial models/arm built by TF, MKM, WM, and interactions as predictors were computed. In both arms, MKF was better modeled by GP, which in treated, all but one of the eight observed data fell within the confidence intervals predicted by the model. However, the control GP had two outliers and MKM as a single predictor. Likewise, the pseudo-R<sup>2</sup> measures of 95% and 46% for treated and control groups also showed that the GP with FEM was more suitable to predict MKF. It should thus be possible to use the GP model to indirectly estimate that an increase of one TF or one fungus-exposed male would increase the number of marked-females by 8% or 9%, respectively, while wild males were an irrelevant predictor to the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":49961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vector Ecology","volume":"48 1","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vector Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52707/1081-1710-48.1.52","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We developed a biological control method directed toward Aedes aegypti using the release of Metarhizium anisopliae-contaminated males to spread the fungus to wild females. A generalized Poisson model was used to relate Ae. aegypti marked females (MKF) to M. anisopliae-exposed males (FEM). In a mark-recapture parallel arm trial, FEM release was a better predictor than unexposed male (UM) releases to forecast MKF by FEM. Total females (TF), marked males (MKM), and wild males (WM) as predictors were counted in human-landings in 15 households treated with 40 FEM each, vs 40 UM released/household/week in 15 households for eight weeks. Fit of MKF to standard, generalized Poisson (GP), and negative binomial models/arm built by TF, MKM, WM, and interactions as predictors were computed. In both arms, MKF was better modeled by GP, which in treated, all but one of the eight observed data fell within the confidence intervals predicted by the model. However, the control GP had two outliers and MKM as a single predictor. Likewise, the pseudo-R2 measures of 95% and 46% for treated and control groups also showed that the GP with FEM was more suitable to predict MKF. It should thus be possible to use the GP model to indirectly estimate that an increase of one TF or one fungus-exposed male would increase the number of marked-females by 8% or 9%, respectively, while wild males were an irrelevant predictor to the model.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vector Ecology is an international journal published by the Society for Vector Ecology. It is concerned with all aspects of the biology, ecology, and control of arthropod and vertebrate vectors and the interrelationships between the vectors and the agents of disease that they transmit. The journal publishes original research articles and scientific notes, as well as comprehensive reviews of vector biology based on presentations at Society meetings. All papers are reviewed by at least two qualified scientists who recommend their suitability for publication. Acceptance of manuscripts is based on their scientific merit and is the final decision of the editor, but these decisions may be appealed to the editorial board. The journal began publishing in 1974 and now publishes on-line only.