Prospective evaluation of an intraoperative urodynamic stress test predicting urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Annals Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-16 DOI:10.4103/ua.ua_47_22
Mirjam Naomi Mohr, Annemarie Uhlig, Arne Strauß, Conrad Leitsmann, Sascha A Ahyai, Lutz Trojan, Mathias Reichert
{"title":"Prospective evaluation of an intraoperative urodynamic stress test predicting urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Mirjam Naomi Mohr,&nbsp;Annemarie Uhlig,&nbsp;Arne Strauß,&nbsp;Conrad Leitsmann,&nbsp;Sascha A Ahyai,&nbsp;Lutz Trojan,&nbsp;Mathias Reichert","doi":"10.4103/ua.ua_47_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple factors influence postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI). This study evaluates the association between an intraoperative urodynamic stress test (IST) with PPI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is an observational, single-center, prospective evaluation of 109 robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALPs) performed between July 2020 and March 2021. All patients underwent an intraoperative urodynamic stress test (IST) in which the bladder is filled up to an intravesical pressure of 40 cm H<sub>2</sub>O to evaluate whether the rhabdomyosphincter is capable of withstanding the pressure and ensure continence. Early PPI was evaluated using a standardized 1-h pad test performed the day after removal of the urinary catheter. The association of IST and PPI was evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 76.6% of the patients showed no urine loss during the IST (\"sufficient\" population group). There was no significant correlation between this group and PPI after catheter removal (<i>P</i> = 0.5). Subgroup analyses of the \"sufficient\" patient population showed a 3.1 higher risk of PPI when no nerve sparing was performed (95% confidence interval: 1.05-9.70, <i>P</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A sufficient IST, as a surrogate variable for a fully obtained rhabdomyosphincter, has no significant predictive value on its own but seems to be the optimal prerequisite for continence, since the data shows that the lack of neurovascular supply required for a functioning sphincter leads up to a 3.1 times higher risk for PPI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"15 2","pages":"166-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/a9/UA-15-166.PMC10252780.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_47_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Multiple factors influence postprostatectomy incontinence (PPI). This study evaluates the association between an intraoperative urodynamic stress test (IST) with PPI.

Materials and methods: This is an observational, single-center, prospective evaluation of 109 robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALPs) performed between July 2020 and March 2021. All patients underwent an intraoperative urodynamic stress test (IST) in which the bladder is filled up to an intravesical pressure of 40 cm H2O to evaluate whether the rhabdomyosphincter is capable of withstanding the pressure and ensure continence. Early PPI was evaluated using a standardized 1-h pad test performed the day after removal of the urinary catheter. The association of IST and PPI was evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results: Nearly 76.6% of the patients showed no urine loss during the IST ("sufficient" population group). There was no significant correlation between this group and PPI after catheter removal (P = 0.5). Subgroup analyses of the "sufficient" patient population showed a 3.1 higher risk of PPI when no nerve sparing was performed (95% confidence interval: 1.05-9.70, P = 0.045).

Conclusion: A sufficient IST, as a surrogate variable for a fully obtained rhabdomyosphincter, has no significant predictive value on its own but seems to be the optimal prerequisite for continence, since the data shows that the lack of neurovascular supply required for a functioning sphincter leads up to a 3.1 times higher risk for PPI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术中尿动力学压力测试预测机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后尿失禁的前瞻性评价。
引言:多种因素影响术后尿失禁(PPI)。本研究评估了术中尿动力学应激测试(IST)与PPI之间的关系。材料和方法:这是对2020年7月至2021年3月期间进行的109例机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术(RALP)的观察性、单中心、前瞻性评估。所有患者都接受了术中尿动力学应力测试(IST),其中膀胱充满至40 cm H2O的膀胱内压力,以评估横纹肌炎是否能够承受压力并确保失禁。使用移除导尿管后第二天进行的标准化1小时衬垫测试来评估早期PPI。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型评估IST和PPI的相关性。结果:近76.6%的患者在IST期间(“充足”人群组)没有尿液损失。该组与导管移除后的PPI之间没有显著相关性(P=0.5)。对“足够”患者群体的亚组分析显示,在不保留神经的情况下,PPI的风险高3.1(95%置信区间:1.05-9.70,P=0.045)。结论:足够的IST作为完全获得的横纹肌炎的替代变量,其本身没有显著的预测价值,但似乎是控制尿的最佳先决条件,因为数据显示,括约肌功能所需的神经血管供应不足导致PPI的风险高3.1倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus: Survival and prognostic factors in surgically treated patients. Survival rate comparisons of angioembolization and neoadjuvant targeted therapy on unresectable renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review. Does tilt-retrograde intrarenal surgery enhance stone clearance and offer better surgical ergonomics in patients with renal calculi? A prospective randomized control study. Factor associated with postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer Test. Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery in <1-year age group: A single-center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1