Prognostic Implications of Sarcoidosis Granulomas - Insights From the Multicenter Registry, the Japanese Cardiac Sarcoidosis Prognostic Study.

Shohei Yoshida, Tomoaki Nakata, Masanao Naya, Mitsuru Momose, Yasuyo Taniguchi, Yoshimitsu Fukushima, Masao Moroi, Atsutaka Okizaki, Akiyoshi Hashimoto, Takatoyo Kiko, Satoshi Hida, Kazuya Takehana, Kenichi Nakajima
{"title":"Prognostic Implications of Sarcoidosis Granulomas - Insights From the Multicenter Registry, the Japanese Cardiac Sarcoidosis Prognostic Study.","authors":"Shohei Yoshida,&nbsp;Tomoaki Nakata,&nbsp;Masanao Naya,&nbsp;Mitsuru Momose,&nbsp;Yasuyo Taniguchi,&nbsp;Yoshimitsu Fukushima,&nbsp;Masao Moroi,&nbsp;Atsutaka Okizaki,&nbsp;Akiyoshi Hashimoto,&nbsp;Takatoyo Kiko,&nbsp;Satoshi Hida,&nbsp;Kazuya Takehana,&nbsp;Kenichi Nakajima","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Definitions of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) differ among guidelines. Any systemic histological finding of CS is essential for the diagnosis of CS in the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society statement, but not necessary in the Japanese Circulation Society 2016 guidelines. This study aimed to reveal the differences in outcomes by comparing 2 groups, namely CS patients with or without systemic histologically proven granuloma. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> This study retrospectively included 231 consecutive patients with CS. CS with granulomas in ≥1 organs was diagnosed in 131 patients (Group G), whereas CS without any granulomas was diagnosed in the remaining 100 patients (Group NG). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly reduced in Group NG compared with Group G (44±13% vs. 50±16%, respectively; P=0.001). However, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups (log-rank P=0.167). Univariable analyses showed that significant predictors of MACE were Groups G/NG, histological CS, LVEF, and high B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro BNP concentrations, but none of these was significant in multivariable analyses. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Overall risks of MACE were similar between the 2 groups despite different manifestations in cardiac dysfunction. The data not only validate the prognostic value of non-invasive diagnosis of CS, but also show the need for careful observation and therapeutic strategy in patients with CS without any granuloma.</p>","PeriodicalId":10276,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Reports","volume":"5 6","pages":"252-259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/2a/circrep-5-252.PMC10247353.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Definitions of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) differ among guidelines. Any systemic histological finding of CS is essential for the diagnosis of CS in the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society statement, but not necessary in the Japanese Circulation Society 2016 guidelines. This study aimed to reveal the differences in outcomes by comparing 2 groups, namely CS patients with or without systemic histologically proven granuloma. Methods and Results: This study retrospectively included 231 consecutive patients with CS. CS with granulomas in ≥1 organs was diagnosed in 131 patients (Group G), whereas CS without any granulomas was diagnosed in the remaining 100 patients (Group NG). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly reduced in Group NG compared with Group G (44±13% vs. 50±16%, respectively; P=0.001). However, Kaplan-Meier curves showed that major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)-free survival outcomes were comparable between the 2 groups (log-rank P=0.167). Univariable analyses showed that significant predictors of MACE were Groups G/NG, histological CS, LVEF, and high B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro BNP concentrations, but none of these was significant in multivariable analyses. Conclusions: Overall risks of MACE were similar between the 2 groups despite different manifestations in cardiac dysfunction. The data not only validate the prognostic value of non-invasive diagnosis of CS, but also show the need for careful observation and therapeutic strategy in patients with CS without any granuloma.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结节病肉芽肿的预后意义——来自多中心注册的见解,日本心脏结节病预后研究。
背景:不同指南对心脏结节病(CS)的定义不同。在2014年心律学会声明中,CS的任何系统性组织学发现对于CS的诊断都是必不可少的,但在日本循环学会2016年指南中则不是必需的。本研究旨在通过比较两组CS患者有无系统性组织学证实的肉芽肿来揭示结局的差异。方法和结果:本研究回顾性纳入了231例连续的CS患者。131例CS合并≥1个脏器肉芽肿(G组),其余100例CS未合并肉芽肿(NG组)。与G组相比,NG组左室射血分数(LVEF)显著降低(分别为44±13%∶50±16%;P = 0.001)。然而,Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,两组无主要不良心血管事件(MACE)生存结局具有可比性(log-rank P=0.167)。单变量分析显示,G/NG组、组织学CS、LVEF和高b型利钠肽(BNP)或n端前BNP浓度是MACE的显著预测因子,但在多变量分析中,这些都不显著。结论:两组患者心功能障碍表现不同,但MACE总体风险相似。这些数据不仅验证了无创诊断CS的预后价值,同时也显示了无肉芽肿的CS患者需要仔细观察和治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Takotsubo Syndrome in Older Men ― Clinical Characteristics Differ by Sex and Age ― Chopstick Stab in the Right Ventricle Clinical Impact of Preoperative Symptoms of Aortic Stenosis on Prognosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Effect of a 3-Month Single-Drug Approach Using Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis Nationwide Survey on Transitional Care for Patients With Childhood-Onset Cardiomyopathy in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1