What about the children? Adult mental health practitioners' experiences and views of family-focused practice in Early Intervention Services

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.1111/papt.12464
Molly Tuck, Anja Wittkowski, Rory Allott, Lynsey Gregg
{"title":"What about the children? Adult mental health practitioners' experiences and views of family-focused practice in Early Intervention Services","authors":"Molly Tuck, Anja Wittkowski, Rory Allott, Lynsey Gregg","doi":"10.1111/papt.12464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThere is a significant risk of negative outcomes for families when a parent experiences serious mental illness. Family-focused practice (FFP) emphasises the \"whole family\" as the unit of care and has been found to improve outcomes for service users and their families. Despite its benefits, FFP is not routinely implemented in UK adult mental health services. This study explores adult mental health practitioners' experiences and views of FFP within Early Intervention Psychosis Services in the UK.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSixteen adult mental health practitioners employed in three Early Intervention Psychosis teams in the Northwest of England were interviewed. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFive core themes were generated: (1) A limited understanding of FFP, (2) Our practitioners, (3) Our approach, (4) Our families and (5) Our services. Practitioners' understanding of FFP was limited and typically excluded dependent children. Practitioners' age, professional and personal experience, and preconceptions of families influenced delivery, and in turn, the engagement approach they adopted impacted families' responsiveness. The diversity and dynamics of service user families such as age, socioeconomic status, culture and stigma impacted FFP. An operational context characterised by insufficient resources reduced FFP; however, organisational structures such as leadership, clinical supervision and multi-disciplinary teams facilitated FFP.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nFFP is not yet embedded within Early Intervention Services. Practice recommendations include agreeing on a formal definition of FFP and its scope; the development of FFP policy; clarity in relation to staff responsibilities and identities; the adoption of a collaborative approach which encourages service user choice and for time to be ring-fenced to prioritise FFP. Future research should ascertain service user and family views on the facilitators and barriers to engaging with FFP in Early Intervention Services.","PeriodicalId":54539,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/papt.12464","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papt.12464","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is a significant risk of negative outcomes for families when a parent experiences serious mental illness. Family-focused practice (FFP) emphasises the "whole family" as the unit of care and has been found to improve outcomes for service users and their families. Despite its benefits, FFP is not routinely implemented in UK adult mental health services. This study explores adult mental health practitioners' experiences and views of FFP within Early Intervention Psychosis Services in the UK. METHODS Sixteen adult mental health practitioners employed in three Early Intervention Psychosis teams in the Northwest of England were interviewed. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Five core themes were generated: (1) A limited understanding of FFP, (2) Our practitioners, (3) Our approach, (4) Our families and (5) Our services. Practitioners' understanding of FFP was limited and typically excluded dependent children. Practitioners' age, professional and personal experience, and preconceptions of families influenced delivery, and in turn, the engagement approach they adopted impacted families' responsiveness. The diversity and dynamics of service user families such as age, socioeconomic status, culture and stigma impacted FFP. An operational context characterised by insufficient resources reduced FFP; however, organisational structures such as leadership, clinical supervision and multi-disciplinary teams facilitated FFP. CONCLUSIONS FFP is not yet embedded within Early Intervention Services. Practice recommendations include agreeing on a formal definition of FFP and its scope; the development of FFP policy; clarity in relation to staff responsibilities and identities; the adoption of a collaborative approach which encourages service user choice and for time to be ring-fenced to prioritise FFP. Future research should ascertain service user and family views on the facilitators and barriers to engaging with FFP in Early Intervention Services.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孩子们怎么办?成人心理健康从业者在早期干预服务中以家庭为中心的实践经验和观点
当父母中有一方患有严重的精神疾病时,对家庭产生负面影响的风险很大。以家庭为中心的做法(FFP)强调“整个家庭”作为护理单位,已被发现可以改善服务使用者及其家庭的结果。尽管FFP有好处,但在英国成人心理健康服务中并没有常规实施。本研究探讨了英国成人心理健康从业者在早期干预精神病服务中对FFP的经验和看法。方法对英格兰西北部3个精神病早期干预小组的16名成年精神卫生从业人员进行访谈。访谈数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果产生了五个核心主题:(1)对FFP的有限理解,(2)我们的从业者,(3)我们的方法,(4)我们的家庭和(5)我们的服务。从业者对FFP的理解是有限的,通常排除了受抚养的儿童。从业人员的年龄、专业和个人经验以及对家庭的先入之见影响了交付,反过来,他们采用的参与方法影响了家庭的响应。服务使用者家庭的多样性和动态,如年龄、社会经济地位、文化和污名影响FFP。以资源不足为特点的业务环境降低了FFP;然而,领导、临床监督和多学科团队等组织结构促进了FFP的发展。结论:FFP尚未纳入早期干预服务。实践建议包括就FFP及其范围的正式定义达成一致;FFP政策的制定;明确工作人员的职责和身份;采用协作方式,鼓励服务用户进行选择,并为优先考虑FFP留出时间。未来的研究应确定服务使用者和家庭对早期干预服务中参与FFP的促进因素和障碍的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice (formerly The British Journal of Medical Psychology) is an international scientific journal with a focus on the psychological and social processes that underlie the development and improvement of psychological problems and mental wellbeing, including: theoretical and research development in the understanding of cognitive and emotional factors in psychological problems; behaviour and relationships; vulnerability to, adjustment to, assessment of, and recovery (assisted or otherwise) from psychological distresses; psychological therapies with a focus on understanding the processes which affect outcomes where mental health is concerned.
期刊最新文献
Adult stakeholders' perspectives on supporting or undermining the mental health of sexual and gender minoritised adolescents. A qualitative study exploring participants experiences of the Mental Imagery for Suicidality in Students Trial. Lost in translation? Qualitative interviews with Australian psychedelic-assisted therapy trial clinicians. ‘Cheering on from the side‐lines’: The perceived impact of romantic partner's commentary and behaviour on maintaining women's appearance anxiety 'Like walking with someone as opposed to trying to catch up to them'-Dynamics at play when clinicians and young people formulate together.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1