Clinical application of a real-time polymerase chain reaction test for CYP2C19 genotyping based on genotype distribution in a healthy Korean population.

Kuenyoul Park, Soo Jin Yoo
{"title":"Clinical application of a real-time polymerase chain reaction test for CYP2C19 genotyping based on genotype distribution in a healthy Korean population.","authors":"Kuenyoul Park, Soo Jin Yoo","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmad070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With the recent reports of additional alleles of the CYP2C19 gene with decreased or no function, the clinical utility of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing that detects only a small number of variant targets needs to be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 7-year data for real-time PCR test records from a single hospital and analyzed CYP2C19 genotypes from publicly available whole-genome or whole-exome data from a healthy Korean population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2327 test results in this hospital, the *1 allele was most common (60.5%), followed by *2 (28.0%), *3 (10.1%), and *17 (1.4%). Among 5305 healthy Korean individuals, the frequencies of the *2, *3, and *17 alleles were 28.6%, 9.9%, and 1.0%, respectively, which were not statistically different from those of the hospital data (P = .4439, P = .6025, and P = .1142, respectively). Interestingly, the total frequency of additional nonfunctional alleles (*4, *6, *22, and *24) that could not be detected using real-time PCR was only 0.1%, with a total allele count of 8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that the clinical utility of real-time PCR for CYP2C19 genotyping remains satisfactory. However, caution should be exercised because the test can miss patients with decreased CYP2C19 function.</p>","PeriodicalId":17951,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"234-237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: With the recent reports of additional alleles of the CYP2C19 gene with decreased or no function, the clinical utility of real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based testing that detects only a small number of variant targets needs to be evaluated.

Method: We retrospectively reviewed 7-year data for real-time PCR test records from a single hospital and analyzed CYP2C19 genotypes from publicly available whole-genome or whole-exome data from a healthy Korean population.

Results: Of the 2327 test results in this hospital, the *1 allele was most common (60.5%), followed by *2 (28.0%), *3 (10.1%), and *17 (1.4%). Among 5305 healthy Korean individuals, the frequencies of the *2, *3, and *17 alleles were 28.6%, 9.9%, and 1.0%, respectively, which were not statistically different from those of the hospital data (P = .4439, P = .6025, and P = .1142, respectively). Interestingly, the total frequency of additional nonfunctional alleles (*4, *6, *22, and *24) that could not be detected using real-time PCR was only 0.1%, with a total allele count of 8.

Conclusion: Our study shows that the clinical utility of real-time PCR for CYP2C19 genotyping remains satisfactory. However, caution should be exercised because the test can miss patients with decreased CYP2C19 function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于韩国健康人群基因型分布的 CYP2C19 基因分型实时聚合酶链反应检验的临床应用。
目的:最近有报道称CYP2C19基因中存在功能减弱或无功能的额外等位基因,基于实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)的检测只能检测少量变异靶点,其临床实用性需要评估:方法:我们回顾性地查看了一家医院7年来的实时PCR检测记录数据,并分析了来自韩国健康人群的公开全基因组或全外显子组数据中的CYP2C19基因型:在该医院的2327份检测结果中,*1等位基因最常见(60.5%),其次是*2(28.0%)、*3(10.1%)和*17(1.4%)。在 5305 名健康的韩国人中,*2、*3 和 *17 等位基因的频率分别为 28.6%、9.9% 和 1.0%,与医院数据无统计学差异(P = .4439、P = .6025 和 P = .1142)。有趣的是,使用实时 PCR 检测不到的其他非功能等位基因(*4、*6、*22 和 *24)的总频率仅为 0.1%,等位基因总数为 8.0%:我们的研究表明,实时 PCR 对 CYP2C19 基因分型的临床实用性仍然令人满意。结论:我们的研究表明,实时 PCR 对 CYP2C19 基因分型的临床应用仍然令人满意,但应谨慎行事,因为该检测可能会漏检 CYP2C19 功能减退的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robert L. Schmidt, MD, PhD, MBA (November 17, 1952-October 25, 2023) A 6-year-old boy with an atypical liver neoplasm harboring a novel RPS6KA3 variant. Evaluating direct amplification from viral transport medium for SARS-CoV-2 detection, strain typing, and angiotensin-converting enzyme genotyping and expression assays. Diagnostic value of pleural effusion Krebs von den Lungen-6 in malignant pleural effusion of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Genetic analysis of TMPRSS6 catalytic domain variants in Mexican patients with iron treatment refractoriness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1