Benefit of rituximab maintenance is associated with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index in patients with follicular lymphoma.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEMATOLOGY 血液科学(英文) Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1097/BS9.0000000000000144
Ru Li, Tingyu Wang, Rui Lyv, Yi Wang, Ying Yu, Yuting Yan, Qi Sun, Wenjie Xiong, Wei Liu, Weiwei Sui, Wenyang Huang, Huijun Wang, Chengwen Li, Jun Wang, Dehui Zou, Gang An, Jianxiang Wang, Lugui Qiu, Shuhua Yi
{"title":"Benefit of rituximab maintenance is associated with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index in patients with follicular lymphoma.","authors":"Ru Li,&nbsp;Tingyu Wang,&nbsp;Rui Lyv,&nbsp;Yi Wang,&nbsp;Ying Yu,&nbsp;Yuting Yan,&nbsp;Qi Sun,&nbsp;Wenjie Xiong,&nbsp;Wei Liu,&nbsp;Weiwei Sui,&nbsp;Wenyang Huang,&nbsp;Huijun Wang,&nbsp;Chengwen Li,&nbsp;Jun Wang,&nbsp;Dehui Zou,&nbsp;Gang An,&nbsp;Jianxiang Wang,&nbsp;Lugui Qiu,&nbsp;Shuhua Yi","doi":"10.1097/BS9.0000000000000144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rituximab maintenance (RM) prolongs the progression-free survival (PFS) of responding patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), but the maintenance efficacy in different Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) risk group is still confusing. We performed a retrospective analysis of the effect of RM treatments in patients with FL responding to induction therapy based on their FLIPI risk assessment carried out prior to treatment. We identified 93 patients between 2013 and 2019 who received RM every 3 months for ≥4 doses (RM group), and 60 patients who did not accept RM or received rituximab less than 4 doses (control group). After a median follow-up of 39 months, neither median overall survival (OS) nor PFS was reached for the entire population. The PFS was significantly prolonged in the RM group compared to the control group (median PFS NA vs 83.1 months, <i>P</i> = .00027). When the population was divided into the 3 FLIPI risk groups, the PFS differed significantly (4-year PFS rates, 97.5% vs 88.8% vs 72.3%, <i>P</i> = .01) according to group. There was no significant difference in PFS for FLIPI low-risk patients with RM compared to the control group (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 93.8%, <i>P</i> = .23). However, the PFS of the RM group was significantly prolonged for FLIPI intermediate-risk (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 70.3%, <i>P</i> = .00077) and high-risk patients (4-year PFS rates, 86.7% vs 57.1%, <i>P</i> = .023). These data suggest that standard RM significantly prolongs the PFS of patients assigned to intermediate- and high-risk FLIPI groups but not to low-risk FLIPI group, and pending larger-scale studies to validate.</p>","PeriodicalId":67343,"journal":{"name":"血液科学(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10205248/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血液科学(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rituximab maintenance (RM) prolongs the progression-free survival (PFS) of responding patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), but the maintenance efficacy in different Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) risk group is still confusing. We performed a retrospective analysis of the effect of RM treatments in patients with FL responding to induction therapy based on their FLIPI risk assessment carried out prior to treatment. We identified 93 patients between 2013 and 2019 who received RM every 3 months for ≥4 doses (RM group), and 60 patients who did not accept RM or received rituximab less than 4 doses (control group). After a median follow-up of 39 months, neither median overall survival (OS) nor PFS was reached for the entire population. The PFS was significantly prolonged in the RM group compared to the control group (median PFS NA vs 83.1 months, P = .00027). When the population was divided into the 3 FLIPI risk groups, the PFS differed significantly (4-year PFS rates, 97.5% vs 88.8% vs 72.3%, P = .01) according to group. There was no significant difference in PFS for FLIPI low-risk patients with RM compared to the control group (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 93.8%, P = .23). However, the PFS of the RM group was significantly prolonged for FLIPI intermediate-risk (4-year PFS rates, 100% vs 70.3%, P = .00077) and high-risk patients (4-year PFS rates, 86.7% vs 57.1%, P = .023). These data suggest that standard RM significantly prolongs the PFS of patients assigned to intermediate- and high-risk FLIPI groups but not to low-risk FLIPI group, and pending larger-scale studies to validate.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利妥昔单抗维持与滤泡性淋巴瘤患者的国际预后指数相关。
利妥昔单抗维持治疗(RM)可延长滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者的无进展生存期(PFS),但不同滤泡性淋巴瘤国际预后指数(FLIPI)风险组的维持疗效尚不明确。我们基于治疗前对FL患者进行的FLIPI风险评估,对RM治疗对诱导治疗的疗效进行了回顾性分析。我们在2013年至2019年期间确定了93例每3个月接受RM≥4次剂量的患者(RM组),以及60例未接受RM或接受利妥昔单抗少于4次剂量的患者(对照组)。中位随访39个月后,整个人群的中位总生存期(OS)和PFS均未达到。与对照组相比,RM组的PFS显著延长(中位PFS NA vs 83.1个月,P = 0.00027)。将人群分为3个FLIPI风险组时,各组PFS差异显著(4年PFS率,97.5% vs 88.8% vs 72.3%, P = 0.01)。与对照组相比,FLIPI低危RM患者的PFS无显著差异(4年PFS率,100% vs 93.8%, P = 0.23)。然而,RM组的FLIPI中危患者(4年PFS率,100% vs 70.3%, P = 0.00077)和高危患者(4年PFS率,86.7% vs 57.1%, P = 0.023)的PFS明显延长。这些数据表明,标准RM可显著延长中高风险FLIPI组患者的PFS,但不能延长低风险FLIPI组患者的PFS,有待更大规模的研究来验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Dual role of BCL11B in T-cell malignancies. Epigenetic modifications in hematopoietic ecosystem: a key tuner from homeostasis to acute myeloid leukemia. Mitochondrial genetic variations in leukemia: a comprehensive overview. Adult megakaryopoiesis: when taking a short-cut results in a different final destination. Targeting macrophages to reprogram the tumor immune microenvironment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1