[The consequences of visiting restrictions in long term care facilities: a narrative review of the literature].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1702/4050.40314
Federica Riva-Rovedda, Alessio Conti, Elena Viottini
{"title":"[The consequences of visiting restrictions in long term care facilities: a narrative review of the literature].","authors":"Federica Riva-Rovedda,&nbsp;Alessio Conti,&nbsp;Elena Viottini","doi":"10.1702/4050.40314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>. The consequences of visiting restrictions in long term care facilities: a narrative review of the literature.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To prevent the spread of Covid-19, residential health care facilities banned access to informal caregivers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the consequences of visiting restrictions in residential facilities during the pandemic and to identify the strategies adopted to lessen their effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A narrative review of the literature was carried out by searching PubMed and CINAHL database between October 2022 and March 2023. The research included primary, qualitative and quantitative studies written in English/Italian language, and in which data collection was performed after 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies were included: 14 qualitative, 7 mixed-method and 7 quantitative. Residents and family members experienced anxiety, sadness, loneliness, apathy, anger and frustration. Technology tried to ensure contact, but with limitations due to residents' cognitive-sensory impairments, technological expertise, and staff's available time. Attempts to allow visitors again were welcomed with gratitude, but access was not always granted, causing discontent. Health care professionals experienced the restrictions with ambivalence, torn between the need to prevent contagion and concerns for residents' quali-ty of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visiting restrictions had negative consequences for residents, family members and health care professionals. The sense of abandonment experienced pointed out the lack of strategies able to balance safety and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":55447,"journal":{"name":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","volume":"42 2","pages":"82-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1702/4050.40314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The consequences of visiting restrictions in long term care facilities: a narrative review of the literature.

Introduction: To prevent the spread of Covid-19, residential health care facilities banned access to informal caregivers.

Aim: To describe the consequences of visiting restrictions in residential facilities during the pandemic and to identify the strategies adopted to lessen their effects.

Methods: A narrative review of the literature was carried out by searching PubMed and CINAHL database between October 2022 and March 2023. The research included primary, qualitative and quantitative studies written in English/Italian language, and in which data collection was performed after 2020.

Results: Twenty-eight studies were included: 14 qualitative, 7 mixed-method and 7 quantitative. Residents and family members experienced anxiety, sadness, loneliness, apathy, anger and frustration. Technology tried to ensure contact, but with limitations due to residents' cognitive-sensory impairments, technological expertise, and staff's available time. Attempts to allow visitors again were welcomed with gratitude, but access was not always granted, causing discontent. Health care professionals experienced the restrictions with ambivalence, torn between the need to prevent contagion and concerns for residents' quali-ty of life.

Conclusions: Visiting restrictions had negative consequences for residents, family members and health care professionals. The sense of abandonment experienced pointed out the lack of strategies able to balance safety and quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[长期护理机构探视限制的后果:文献综述]。
。长期护理机构探视限制的后果:文献综述。导言:为防止Covid-19的传播,住宅卫生保健机构禁止接触非正式护理人员。目的:描述大流行期间在住宅设施限制探视的后果,并确定为减轻其影响而采取的战略。方法:检索PubMed和CINAHL数据库,对2022年10月至2023年3月的相关文献进行叙述性回顾。该研究包括以英语/意大利语撰写的初级、定性和定量研究,并在2020年之后进行数据收集。结果:共纳入28项研究:定性研究14项,混合方法研究7项,定量研究7项。居民和家庭成员经历了焦虑、悲伤、孤独、冷漠、愤怒和沮丧。技术试图确保接触,但由于居民的认知感官障碍,技术专业知识和工作人员的可用时间有限。再次允许游客进入的尝试受到了欢迎,但并不总是允许,引起了不满。卫生保健专业人员对这些限制感到矛盾,既需要防止传染,又担心居民的生活质量。结论:探视限制对居民、家庭成员和卫生保健专业人员有负面影响。被遗弃感的经历表明缺乏能够平衡安全和生活质量的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Assistenza Infermieristica e Ricerca (AIR) è una rivista scientifica che si propone l''obiettivo di promuovere e sviluppare il confronto sulle conoscenze che hanno un impatto sulla pratica, sulla formazione e sulla direzione dell''assistenza infermieristica.
期刊最新文献
[Patient and public involvement in research]. [What to do when questions are many and the answers do not have deadlines?] [Tracheal rupture treated with robotic surgery: the importance of evidence-based practice in nursing management. A case report]. [Assessing the impact of bladder ultrasound on catheter-associated urinary tract infections and health-care costs: an observational pre-post study]. [Septic shock in patient undergoing hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. A case report].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1