一名45岁菲律宾人注射CoronaVac后视网膜动脉闭塞。

Daniel Jose M Mendoza, David Francis F Chan, Ellen N Yu-Keh, Bryan Christopher W Sy
{"title":"一名45岁菲律宾人注射CoronaVac后视网膜动脉闭塞。","authors":"Daniel Jose M Mendoza,&nbsp;David Francis F Chan,&nbsp;Ellen N Yu-Keh,&nbsp;Bryan Christopher W Sy","doi":"10.3205/oc000220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While complex public health challenges and the emergence of variants have impeded responses to the COVID pandemic, vaccines continue to represent a crucial tool in mitigating the risk of morbidity and mortality. Safety issues weigh heavily upon both the utility and acceptability of every vaccine. Reports of sight-threatening events are scarce.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>We report the case of a hypertensive 45-year-old Filipino who noted unilateral (right eye) blurring of vision within 48 hours of his first dose of CoronaVac (Sinovac, China), an inactivated SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccine, with macular retinal arterial occlusion noted on day 21 post-inoculation. Further work-up revealed abnormal glycemic, metabolic, inflammatory, and bleeding parameters. Vision improved from counting fingers to 20/100 at week 6 with no interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A potential association between retinal vasoocclusion and inoculation with CoronaVac in our patient is supported by the temporal sequence of events, multiple mechanisms put forward in other cases, and reports of vascular adverse reactions in large country-level trials. It is mitigated by the profound infrequency of such events and the potentially substantial risk for ocular ischemic events imparted by the patient's baseline clinical background. Continued understanding of vaccine adverse reactions, however rare, is important not only for individual patient safety. This is helpful in ensuring the utility of current vaccines and in preserving the acceptability of vaccines through and beyond the current pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73178,"journal":{"name":"GMS ophthalmology cases","volume":"13 ","pages":"Doc12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retinal artery occlusion following CoronaVac injection in a 45-year-old Filipino.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Jose M Mendoza,&nbsp;David Francis F Chan,&nbsp;Ellen N Yu-Keh,&nbsp;Bryan Christopher W Sy\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/oc000220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While complex public health challenges and the emergence of variants have impeded responses to the COVID pandemic, vaccines continue to represent a crucial tool in mitigating the risk of morbidity and mortality. Safety issues weigh heavily upon both the utility and acceptability of every vaccine. Reports of sight-threatening events are scarce.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>We report the case of a hypertensive 45-year-old Filipino who noted unilateral (right eye) blurring of vision within 48 hours of his first dose of CoronaVac (Sinovac, China), an inactivated SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccine, with macular retinal arterial occlusion noted on day 21 post-inoculation. Further work-up revealed abnormal glycemic, metabolic, inflammatory, and bleeding parameters. Vision improved from counting fingers to 20/100 at week 6 with no interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A potential association between retinal vasoocclusion and inoculation with CoronaVac in our patient is supported by the temporal sequence of events, multiple mechanisms put forward in other cases, and reports of vascular adverse reactions in large country-level trials. It is mitigated by the profound infrequency of such events and the potentially substantial risk for ocular ischemic events imparted by the patient's baseline clinical background. Continued understanding of vaccine adverse reactions, however rare, is important not only for individual patient safety. This is helpful in ensuring the utility of current vaccines and in preserving the acceptability of vaccines through and beyond the current pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS ophthalmology cases\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Doc12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10413252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS ophthalmology cases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/oc000220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS ophthalmology cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/oc000220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然复杂的公共卫生挑战和变异的出现阻碍了对COVID大流行的应对,但疫苗仍然是降低发病率和死亡率风险的关键工具。安全性问题严重影响着每一种疫苗的效用和可接受性。关于视力威胁事件的报道很少。病例描述:我们报告了一例45岁的菲律宾高血压患者,他在首次注射冠状病毒2/COVID-19灭活疫苗CoronaVac(中国科诺华)后48小时内发现单侧(右眼)视力模糊,接种后第21天发现黄斑视网膜动脉闭塞。进一步检查发现血糖、代谢、炎症和出血参数异常。在没有干预的情况下,视力在第6周从数手指改善到20/100。结论:在我们的患者中,视网膜血管闭合与接种CoronaVac之间的潜在关联得到了事件时间序列、其他病例中提出的多种机制以及大型国家级试验中血管不良反应报告的支持。由于此类事件的发生率极低,并且患者的基线临床背景赋予了眼缺血事件的潜在重大风险,因此减轻了这种风险。持续了解疫苗不良反应,无论多么罕见,不仅对患者个人安全很重要。这有助于确保利用现有疫苗,并在当前大流行期间和之后保持疫苗的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retinal artery occlusion following CoronaVac injection in a 45-year-old Filipino.

Background: While complex public health challenges and the emergence of variants have impeded responses to the COVID pandemic, vaccines continue to represent a crucial tool in mitigating the risk of morbidity and mortality. Safety issues weigh heavily upon both the utility and acceptability of every vaccine. Reports of sight-threatening events are scarce.

Case description: We report the case of a hypertensive 45-year-old Filipino who noted unilateral (right eye) blurring of vision within 48 hours of his first dose of CoronaVac (Sinovac, China), an inactivated SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccine, with macular retinal arterial occlusion noted on day 21 post-inoculation. Further work-up revealed abnormal glycemic, metabolic, inflammatory, and bleeding parameters. Vision improved from counting fingers to 20/100 at week 6 with no interventions.

Conclusion: A potential association between retinal vasoocclusion and inoculation with CoronaVac in our patient is supported by the temporal sequence of events, multiple mechanisms put forward in other cases, and reports of vascular adverse reactions in large country-level trials. It is mitigated by the profound infrequency of such events and the potentially substantial risk for ocular ischemic events imparted by the patient's baseline clinical background. Continued understanding of vaccine adverse reactions, however rare, is important not only for individual patient safety. This is helpful in ensuring the utility of current vaccines and in preserving the acceptability of vaccines through and beyond the current pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cancer-associated retinopathy secondary to gallbladder carcinoma. Diffuse preretinal infiltrates in a patient with orbital atypical T-cell lymphoproliferative infiltration masquerading posterior uveitis. Epithelial downgrowth masquerading as granulomatous anterior and intermediate uveitis with histopathologic evidence of 5-FU treatment. Pseudophakic corneal edema caused by Descemet membrane detachment using high-resolution swept-source OCT imaging. Bilateral reversible optic neuropathy as the first sign of Waldenström macroglobulinema.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1