产科暴力：未经同意的绝育。Y.P.诉俄罗斯联邦案。

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1163/15718093-bja10111

André den Exter

{"title":"产科暴力：未经同意的绝育。Y.P.诉俄罗斯联邦案。","authors":"André den Exter","doi":"10.1163/15718093-bja10111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 20 September 2022, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in a remarkable case on sterilisation without the patient's consent, Y.P. v Russian Federation (ECtHR, application no. 43399/13, 20 September 2022). According to the Court, there is no inhuman and degrading treatment, but it was a justified medical procedure. However, the Court did conclude a violation of the right to private life, under Article 8 ECHR. This outcome is at odds with an earlier sterilisation case without consent, V.C. v Slovakia (V.C. v. Slovakia, ECtHR application no. 18968/07, 8 November 2011). The question is how both rulings can be understood, especially the legal consideration regarding the prohibition of torture. After all, both cases lacked the patient's consent.","PeriodicalId":43934,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","volume":" ","pages":"551-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetric Violence: Sterilisation without Consent. The Case of Y.P. v. Russian Federation.\",\"authors\":\"André den Exter\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718093-bja10111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 20 September 2022, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in a remarkable case on sterilisation without the patient's consent, Y.P. v Russian Federation (ECtHR, application no. 43399/13, 20 September 2022). According to the Court, there is no inhuman and degrading treatment, but it was a justified medical procedure. However, the Court did conclude a violation of the right to private life, under Article 8 ECHR. This outcome is at odds with an earlier sterilisation case without consent, V.C. v Slovakia (V.C. v. Slovakia, ECtHR application no. 18968/07, 8 November 2011). The question is how both rulings can be understood, especially the legal consideration regarding the prohibition of torture. After all, both cases lacked the patient's consent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"551-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年 9 月 20 日，欧洲人权法院（ECtHR）对一起关于未经患者同意实施绝育手术的重要案件--Y.P.诉俄罗斯联邦（ECtHR，第 43399/13 号申请，2022 年 9 月 20 日）做出了判决。法院认为，不存在不人道和有辱人格的待遇，这是一个合理的医疗程序。然而，根据《欧洲人权公约》第 8 条，法院确实得出了侵犯私人生活权的结论。这一结果与早前的 V.C. 诉斯洛伐克（V.C. v. Slovakia，欧洲人权法院诉状编号：18968/07，2011 年 11 月 8 日）未经同意的绝育案件相左。问题在于如何理解这两项裁决，尤其是有关禁止酷刑的法律考量。毕竟，这两个案件都没有征得患者的同意。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Obstetric Violence: Sterilisation without Consent. The Case of Y.P. v. Russian Federation.

On 20 September 2022, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in a remarkable case on sterilisation without the patient's consent, Y.P. v Russian Federation (ECtHR, application no. 43399/13, 20 September 2022). According to the Court, there is no inhuman and degrading treatment, but it was a justified medical procedure. However, the Court did conclude a violation of the right to private life, under Article 8 ECHR. This outcome is at odds with an earlier sterilisation case without consent, V.C. v Slovakia (V.C. v. Slovakia, ECtHR application no. 18968/07, 8 November 2011). The question is how both rulings can be understood, especially the legal consideration regarding the prohibition of torture. After all, both cases lacked the patient's consent.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW LAW-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Jewish Studies (EJJS) is the Journal of the European Association for Jewish Studies (EAJS). Its main purpose is to publish high-quality research articles, essays and shorter contributions on all aspects of Jewish Studies. Submissions are all double blind peer-reviewed. Additionally, EJJS seeks to inform its readers on current developments in Jewish Studies: it carries comprehensive review-essays on specific topics, trends and debated questions, as well as regular book-reviews. A further section carries reports on conferences, symposia, and descriptions of research projects in every area of Jewish Studies.

期刊最新文献

An Assessment on Innovator's Ability for Consent-Free Health Data Reuse, In the Context of the GDPR and EHDS: The Netherlands Case Study. European Court of Justice. An Exploratory Study of Capacity Assessment in Medical Practice in Ireland. Selected Legislature and Jurisprudence. Selected Legislation and Jurisprudence.