Saba Maghari, Tyler Gallo, Salvador Rivas, Alexander German, Minh Q Nguyen Le, Hamed Abbaszadegan, Mark A Zubriski, Craig W Heise, Noel D Landas
{"title":"处方药与可行的药物基因组学建议在退伍军人健康管理局的病人。","authors":"Saba Maghari, Tyler Gallo, Salvador Rivas, Alexander German, Minh Q Nguyen Le, Hamed Abbaszadegan, Mark A Zubriski, Craig W Heise, Noel D Landas","doi":"10.2217/pgs-2023-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the prevalence of medications with actionable pharmacogenomic (PGx) safety and efficacy recommendations in patients receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Outpatient prescription data from 2011 to 2021 and any documented adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reviewed for those who received PGx testing at one Veterans Administration location between November 2019 and October 2021. <b>Results:</b> Among the reviewed prescriptions, 381 (32.8%) were associated with an actionable recommendation based on the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) prescribing guidelines, with 205 (17.7%) for efficacy concerns and 176 (15.2%) for safety concerns. Among those with a documented ADR for a PGx-impacted medication, 39.1% had PGx results that aligned with CPIC recommendations. <b>Conclusion:</b> Medications with actionable PGx recommendations for safety and efficacy concerns are received with similar frequency, and most patients who have undergone PGx testing at the Phoenix Veterans Administration have received medications that may be impacted by PGx testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20018,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacogenomics","volume":"24 9","pages":"501-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription medications with actionable pharmacogenomic recommendations in Veterans Health Administration patients.\",\"authors\":\"Saba Maghari, Tyler Gallo, Salvador Rivas, Alexander German, Minh Q Nguyen Le, Hamed Abbaszadegan, Mark A Zubriski, Craig W Heise, Noel D Landas\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/pgs-2023-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the prevalence of medications with actionable pharmacogenomic (PGx) safety and efficacy recommendations in patients receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Outpatient prescription data from 2011 to 2021 and any documented adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reviewed for those who received PGx testing at one Veterans Administration location between November 2019 and October 2021. <b>Results:</b> Among the reviewed prescriptions, 381 (32.8%) were associated with an actionable recommendation based on the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) prescribing guidelines, with 205 (17.7%) for efficacy concerns and 176 (15.2%) for safety concerns. Among those with a documented ADR for a PGx-impacted medication, 39.1% had PGx results that aligned with CPIC recommendations. <b>Conclusion:</b> Medications with actionable PGx recommendations for safety and efficacy concerns are received with similar frequency, and most patients who have undergone PGx testing at the Phoenix Veterans Administration have received medications that may be impacted by PGx testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacogenomics\",\"volume\":\"24 9\",\"pages\":\"501-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacogenomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2023-0018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacogenomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2023-0018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prescription medications with actionable pharmacogenomic recommendations in Veterans Health Administration patients.
Aim: To evaluate the prevalence of medications with actionable pharmacogenomic (PGx) safety and efficacy recommendations in patients receiving care from the Veterans Health Administration. Materials & methods: Outpatient prescription data from 2011 to 2021 and any documented adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reviewed for those who received PGx testing at one Veterans Administration location between November 2019 and October 2021. Results: Among the reviewed prescriptions, 381 (32.8%) were associated with an actionable recommendation based on the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) prescribing guidelines, with 205 (17.7%) for efficacy concerns and 176 (15.2%) for safety concerns. Among those with a documented ADR for a PGx-impacted medication, 39.1% had PGx results that aligned with CPIC recommendations. Conclusion: Medications with actionable PGx recommendations for safety and efficacy concerns are received with similar frequency, and most patients who have undergone PGx testing at the Phoenix Veterans Administration have received medications that may be impacted by PGx testing.
期刊介绍:
Pharmacogenomics (ISSN 1462-2416) is a peer-reviewed journal presenting reviews and reports by the researchers and decision-makers closely involved in this rapidly developing area. Key objectives are to provide the community with an essential resource for keeping abreast of the latest developments in all areas of this exciting field.
Pharmacogenomics is the leading source of commentary and analysis, bringing you the highest quality expert analyses from corporate and academic opinion leaders in the field.