{"title":"Delta和Omicron变异期间的老年人mRNA COVID-19疫苗的实际有效性:系统评价","authors":"Harvey Palalay, Riddhi Vyas, Barbara Tafuto","doi":"10.13105/wjma.v11.i5.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As of 31 December 2022, there were over 6.6 million coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths and over 651 million cases across 200 countries worldwide. Despite the increase in vaccinations and booster shots, COVID-19 cases and deaths continue to remain high. While the effectiveness of these vaccines has already been established by different manufacturers, the fact remains that these vaccines were created quickly for global emergency use, tested under controlled clinical conditions from voluntary subjects and age groups whose general characteristics may differ from the actual general population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To conduct a systematic review to determine the real-world effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly during the predominance of Delta and Omicron variants in preventing COVID-19 related infection, hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and intubation, and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A combination of Medical Subject Headings and non-Medical Subject Headings was carried out to identify all relevant research articles that meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria from PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, as well as qualified research studies from pre-print servers using medRxiv and Research Square, published from January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As per the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were evaluated from an estimated total study population of 26,535,692 using infection, hospital, ICU admission and intubation, and death as outcome measures from studies published between 2021 and 2022, conducted in New York, Finland, Canada, Costa Rica, Qatar, Greece, and Brazil. The risk of bias was evaluated using risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. While clinical trial data on Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines demonstrated 94% vaccine effectiveness in the elderly, the results in this study showed that vaccine effectiveness in real-world settings is marginally lower against infection (40%-89%), hospitalization (92%), ICU admission and intubation (98%-85%), and death (77%-87%) with an indication of diminished effectiveness of vaccine over time. Furthermore, 2 doses of mRNA vaccines are inadequate and only provides interim protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because of the natural diminishing effectiveness of the vaccine, the need for booster dose to restore its efficacy is vital. From a research perspective, the use of highly heterogeneous outcome measures inhibits the comparison, contrast, and integration of the results which makes data pooling across different studies problematic. While pharmaceutical intervention like vaccination is important to fight an epidemic, utilizing common outcome measurements or carrying out studies with minimal heterogeneity in outcome measurements, is equally crucial to better understand and respond to an international health crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":65781,"journal":{"name":"世界荟萃分析杂志(英文版)","volume":"11 5","pages":"167-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/19/nihms-1915737.PMC10421623.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly during the Delta and Omicron variants: Systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Harvey Palalay, Riddhi Vyas, Barbara Tafuto\",\"doi\":\"10.13105/wjma.v11.i5.167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As of 31 December 2022, there were over 6.6 million coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths and over 651 million cases across 200 countries worldwide. Despite the increase in vaccinations and booster shots, COVID-19 cases and deaths continue to remain high. While the effectiveness of these vaccines has already been established by different manufacturers, the fact remains that these vaccines were created quickly for global emergency use, tested under controlled clinical conditions from voluntary subjects and age groups whose general characteristics may differ from the actual general population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To conduct a systematic review to determine the real-world effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly during the predominance of Delta and Omicron variants in preventing COVID-19 related infection, hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and intubation, and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A combination of Medical Subject Headings and non-Medical Subject Headings was carried out to identify all relevant research articles that meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria from PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, as well as qualified research studies from pre-print servers using medRxiv and Research Square, published from January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As per the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were evaluated from an estimated total study population of 26,535,692 using infection, hospital, ICU admission and intubation, and death as outcome measures from studies published between 2021 and 2022, conducted in New York, Finland, Canada, Costa Rica, Qatar, Greece, and Brazil. The risk of bias was evaluated using risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. While clinical trial data on Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines demonstrated 94% vaccine effectiveness in the elderly, the results in this study showed that vaccine effectiveness in real-world settings is marginally lower against infection (40%-89%), hospitalization (92%), ICU admission and intubation (98%-85%), and death (77%-87%) with an indication of diminished effectiveness of vaccine over time. Furthermore, 2 doses of mRNA vaccines are inadequate and only provides interim protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because of the natural diminishing effectiveness of the vaccine, the need for booster dose to restore its efficacy is vital. From a research perspective, the use of highly heterogeneous outcome measures inhibits the comparison, contrast, and integration of the results which makes data pooling across different studies problematic. While pharmaceutical intervention like vaccination is important to fight an epidemic, utilizing common outcome measurements or carrying out studies with minimal heterogeneity in outcome measurements, is equally crucial to better understand and respond to an international health crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":65781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界荟萃分析杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"167-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/95/19/nihms-1915737.PMC10421623.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界荟萃分析杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v11.i5.167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界荟萃分析杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v11.i5.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:截至2022年12月31日,全球200个国家的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)死亡人数超过660万,病例超过6.51亿。尽管疫苗接种和加强注射有所增加,但COVID-19病例和死亡人数仍然很高。虽然不同的制造商已经确定了这些疫苗的有效性,但事实仍然是,这些疫苗是为全球紧急使用而快速生产的,在受控的临床条件下从自愿受试者和一般特征可能与实际一般人群不同的年龄组进行测试。目的:通过一项系统评价,确定在Delta和Omicron变异占主导地位的老年人中,mRNA - COVID-19疫苗在预防COVID-19相关感染、住院、重症监护病房(ICU)入院和插管以及死亡方面的实际有效性。方法:结合医学主题词和非医学主题词,从PubMed、Cochrane、CINAHL、Scopus、ProQuest、Embase、Web of Science和Google Scholar数据库中确定符合纳入和排除标准的所有相关研究文章,以及使用medRxiv和research Square的预印服务器中发表的2021年1月1日至2022年12月31日发表的合格研究文章。结果:根据纳入和排除标准,在纽约、芬兰、加拿大、哥斯达黎加、卡塔尔、希腊和巴西进行的2021年至2022年发表的研究中,以感染、住院、ICU住院和插管以及死亡为结局指标,从估计的总研究人群26,535,692人中评估了辉瑞- biontech和Moderna疫苗的有效性。使用队列、病例对照和横断面研究的非随机干预研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估偏倚风险。虽然辉瑞- biontech和Moderna疫苗的临床试验数据显示,疫苗在老年人中的有效性为94%,但本研究的结果显示,在现实环境中,疫苗对感染(40%-89%)、住院(92%)、ICU入院和插管(98%-85%)以及死亡(77%-87%)的有效性略低,并表明疫苗的有效性随着时间的推移而降低。此外,2剂mRNA疫苗是不够的,只能提供临时保护。结论:由于疫苗的效力自然递减,需要加强剂量以恢复其效力是至关重要的。从研究的角度来看,使用高度异质的结果测量抑制了结果的比较、对比和整合,这使得跨不同研究的数据池存在问题。虽然疫苗接种等药物干预措施对于抗击流行病很重要,但利用共同的结果测量或开展结果测量中异质性最小的研究,对于更好地了解和应对国际卫生危机同样至关重要。
Real-world effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly during the Delta and Omicron variants: Systematic review.
Background: As of 31 December 2022, there were over 6.6 million coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths and over 651 million cases across 200 countries worldwide. Despite the increase in vaccinations and booster shots, COVID-19 cases and deaths continue to remain high. While the effectiveness of these vaccines has already been established by different manufacturers, the fact remains that these vaccines were created quickly for global emergency use, tested under controlled clinical conditions from voluntary subjects and age groups whose general characteristics may differ from the actual general population.
Aim: To conduct a systematic review to determine the real-world effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the elderly during the predominance of Delta and Omicron variants in preventing COVID-19 related infection, hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and intubation, and death.
Methods: A combination of Medical Subject Headings and non-Medical Subject Headings was carried out to identify all relevant research articles that meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria from PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, as well as qualified research studies from pre-print servers using medRxiv and Research Square, published from January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2022.
Results: As per the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were evaluated from an estimated total study population of 26,535,692 using infection, hospital, ICU admission and intubation, and death as outcome measures from studies published between 2021 and 2022, conducted in New York, Finland, Canada, Costa Rica, Qatar, Greece, and Brazil. The risk of bias was evaluated using risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. While clinical trial data on Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines demonstrated 94% vaccine effectiveness in the elderly, the results in this study showed that vaccine effectiveness in real-world settings is marginally lower against infection (40%-89%), hospitalization (92%), ICU admission and intubation (98%-85%), and death (77%-87%) with an indication of diminished effectiveness of vaccine over time. Furthermore, 2 doses of mRNA vaccines are inadequate and only provides interim protection.
Conclusion: Because of the natural diminishing effectiveness of the vaccine, the need for booster dose to restore its efficacy is vital. From a research perspective, the use of highly heterogeneous outcome measures inhibits the comparison, contrast, and integration of the results which makes data pooling across different studies problematic. While pharmaceutical intervention like vaccination is important to fight an epidemic, utilizing common outcome measurements or carrying out studies with minimal heterogeneity in outcome measurements, is equally crucial to better understand and respond to an international health crisis.