胫骨内侧开口楔形高位截骨术中隐神经髌下支纵斜皮肤切口间的损伤。

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.5704/MOJ.2307.009
W Kongcharoensombat, P Charoensri
{"title":"胫骨内侧开口楔形高位截骨术中隐神经髌下支纵斜皮肤切口间的损伤。","authors":"W Kongcharoensombat,&nbsp;P Charoensri","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2307.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve (IPBSN) has anatomic variations and prone to injury during surgery around the medial side of the knee. High tibial osteotomy is one of the procedures that may be risky to the IPBSN. This research was aimed to establish which skin incision (vertical vs oblique) is less likely to damage to the IPBSN and also to study the anatomy of the IPBSN, with the institutional review board reference (No. LH611054, date 10/1/2020). The primary outcomes are aimed to establish which skin incision (vertical vs oblique) is less damaging to the IPBSN. The secondary outcome is to study about the anatomy of the IPBSN.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two fresh cadavers (forty-four knees) were dissected by randomisation under the block of four technique, and two different incisions were performed for each knee. Exploration was performed from the skin incision to the IPBSN around the incision zone. If the discontinuity of the nerve was found, it was classified as IPBSN injury. The anatomic measurement was performed. The IPBSN injury between two groups were analysed with the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of IPBSN injury in the oblique group was 2 from 22 knees (9.1%), and 12 knees from 22 knees (54.5%) in the vertical group (P=0.001). Most common number of branch(es) found, is one branch, the horizontal distance ranged from 2.6cm to 8.5cm (average 5.7±1.6), the vertical distance ranged from 4.4cm to 12.6cm (average 7.6±1.9) and the declination angle ranged from 6° to 87° (average 34.7±24.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of the IPBSN injury in oblique skin incision may be less than the vertical incision in the medial opening wedge HTO.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injury of the Infrapatellar Branch of Saphenous Nerve Between Vertical and Oblique Skin Incision in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.\",\"authors\":\"W Kongcharoensombat,&nbsp;P Charoensri\",\"doi\":\"10.5704/MOJ.2307.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve (IPBSN) has anatomic variations and prone to injury during surgery around the medial side of the knee. High tibial osteotomy is one of the procedures that may be risky to the IPBSN. This research was aimed to establish which skin incision (vertical vs oblique) is less likely to damage to the IPBSN and also to study the anatomy of the IPBSN, with the institutional review board reference (No. LH611054, date 10/1/2020). The primary outcomes are aimed to establish which skin incision (vertical vs oblique) is less damaging to the IPBSN. The secondary outcome is to study about the anatomy of the IPBSN.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-two fresh cadavers (forty-four knees) were dissected by randomisation under the block of four technique, and two different incisions were performed for each knee. Exploration was performed from the skin incision to the IPBSN around the incision zone. If the discontinuity of the nerve was found, it was classified as IPBSN injury. The anatomic measurement was performed. The IPBSN injury between two groups were analysed with the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The risk of IPBSN injury in the oblique group was 2 from 22 knees (9.1%), and 12 knees from 22 knees (54.5%) in the vertical group (P=0.001). Most common number of branch(es) found, is one branch, the horizontal distance ranged from 2.6cm to 8.5cm (average 5.7±1.6), the vertical distance ranged from 4.4cm to 12.6cm (average 7.6±1.9) and the declination angle ranged from 6° to 87° (average 34.7±24.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk of the IPBSN injury in oblique skin incision may be less than the vertical incision in the medial opening wedge HTO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425006/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2307.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2307.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:隐神经髌下分支(IPBSN)在手术中存在解剖变异,在膝关节内侧周围易发生损伤。高位胫骨截骨术是对IPBSN可能有风险的手术之一。本研究的目的是确定哪个皮肤切口(垂直还是斜向)更不容易损伤IPBSN,并研究IPBSN的解剖结构。LH611054,日期2020年10月1日)。主要结果旨在确定哪个皮肤切口(垂直还是斜向)对IPBSN的损伤较小。次要结果是研究IPBSN的解剖结构。材料与方法:随机选取22具新鲜尸体(44个膝关节),采用四种方法,每个膝关节做两个不同的切口。从皮肤切口到切口周围的IPBSN进行探查。如发现神经不连续,则归类为IPBSN损伤。进行解剖测量。采用卡方检验分析两组间IPBSN损伤情况。结果:斜向组22膝发生IPBSN损伤的风险为2例(9.1%),垂直组22膝发生IPBSN损伤的风险为12例(54.5%)(P=0.001)。最常见的分支数为1个分支,水平距离为2.6 ~ 8.5cm(平均5.7±1.6),垂直距离为4.4 ~ 12.6cm(平均7.6±1.9),赤纬角为6°~ 87°(平均34.7±24.3)。结论:斜切口植皮损伤的风险小于斜切口植皮损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Injury of the Infrapatellar Branch of Saphenous Nerve Between Vertical and Oblique Skin Incision in Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

Introduction: The infrapatellar branch of saphenous nerve (IPBSN) has anatomic variations and prone to injury during surgery around the medial side of the knee. High tibial osteotomy is one of the procedures that may be risky to the IPBSN. This research was aimed to establish which skin incision (vertical vs oblique) is less likely to damage to the IPBSN and also to study the anatomy of the IPBSN, with the institutional review board reference (No. LH611054, date 10/1/2020). The primary outcomes are aimed to establish which skin incision (vertical vs oblique) is less damaging to the IPBSN. The secondary outcome is to study about the anatomy of the IPBSN.

Materials and methods: Twenty-two fresh cadavers (forty-four knees) were dissected by randomisation under the block of four technique, and two different incisions were performed for each knee. Exploration was performed from the skin incision to the IPBSN around the incision zone. If the discontinuity of the nerve was found, it was classified as IPBSN injury. The anatomic measurement was performed. The IPBSN injury between two groups were analysed with the chi-square test.

Results: The risk of IPBSN injury in the oblique group was 2 from 22 knees (9.1%), and 12 knees from 22 knees (54.5%) in the vertical group (P=0.001). Most common number of branch(es) found, is one branch, the horizontal distance ranged from 2.6cm to 8.5cm (average 5.7±1.6), the vertical distance ranged from 4.4cm to 12.6cm (average 7.6±1.9) and the declination angle ranged from 6° to 87° (average 34.7±24.3).

Conclusion: The risk of the IPBSN injury in oblique skin incision may be less than the vertical incision in the medial opening wedge HTO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric Analysis of Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal using Scopus Database. Complete Suprapatellar Plica in a Handball Player: A Case Report. Creating Novel Standards for Datapoints on an Elective Orthopaedic Theatre List Document. Deafening Silence of Malaysian Medical and Surgical Fraternities to the Gaza Genocide. Functional Outcomes and a Review of Management Options for Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1