认证感知价值工具-12 调查结果:卒中和神经科学护士对认证价值的认知分析。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuroscience Nursing Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1097/JNN.0000000000000667
Suzy Mascaro Walter, Norma D McNair, Rebecca Banat, Tracey Anderson, Zheng Dai, Kesheng Wang
{"title":"认证感知价值工具-12 调查结果:卒中和神经科学护士对认证价值的认知分析。","authors":"Suzy Mascaro Walter, Norma D McNair, Rebecca Banat, Tracey Anderson, Zheng Dai, Kesheng Wang","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore the perceived value of certification among those with a neuroscience or stroke nursing certification. METHODS: The Perceived Value of Certification Tool-12 (PVCT-12) consists of 12 value statements related to the benefits of certification, using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the percentage of agreement among respondents with each of the PVCT-12 items. A generalized linear model approach was then used to estimate the associations between age, sex, race, experience, certification, highest degree earned, primary responsibility, and primary work setting with intrinsic and extrinsic values. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify factors on which related variables were found. RESULTS: The 632 certificants were predominantly female (90%) with a mean age of 54 years. Approximately 80% were White, followed by Asian (11%), Hispanic (4%), and Black (3%). Certification included certified neuroscience registered nurse (34%), stroke certified registered nurse (47%), or both (20%). Approximately 57% of the certificants work in critical care/medical-surgical units. Work setting included academic (46%) and community (42%). Responses indicated lower levels of agreement with the value statements regarding certification challenges, professional autonomy, being listened to, and monetary gain. Those in administration had statistically significant higher intrinsic and extrinsic value scores ( P = .005) as compared with those in nonadministrative roles. There was no significant difference on perceived intrinsic or extrinsic values for those who work in an academic environment versus those who work in a community environment ( P = .25). After factor analysis, the PVCT-12 was found to have 3 factors that accounted for 53.4% of the total variation in the data: recognition of specialization, personal achievement, and professional accomplishment. CONCLUSION: The PVCT-12 incorporated a Likert-type scale to provide levels of agreement for intrinsic and extrinsic values among stroke certified registered nurses and certified neuroscience registered nurses. To complement these findings, further research using open-ended questions is needed to improve our understanding of participant responses regarding complex values such as \"autonomy\" and the \"extent of being listened to.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":50113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","volume":"54 5","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results From the Perceived Value of Certification Tool-12 Survey: Analysis of the Perceived Value of Certification Among Stroke and Neuroscience Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Suzy Mascaro Walter, Norma D McNair, Rebecca Banat, Tracey Anderson, Zheng Dai, Kesheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore the perceived value of certification among those with a neuroscience or stroke nursing certification. METHODS: The Perceived Value of Certification Tool-12 (PVCT-12) consists of 12 value statements related to the benefits of certification, using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the percentage of agreement among respondents with each of the PVCT-12 items. A generalized linear model approach was then used to estimate the associations between age, sex, race, experience, certification, highest degree earned, primary responsibility, and primary work setting with intrinsic and extrinsic values. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify factors on which related variables were found. RESULTS: The 632 certificants were predominantly female (90%) with a mean age of 54 years. Approximately 80% were White, followed by Asian (11%), Hispanic (4%), and Black (3%). Certification included certified neuroscience registered nurse (34%), stroke certified registered nurse (47%), or both (20%). Approximately 57% of the certificants work in critical care/medical-surgical units. Work setting included academic (46%) and community (42%). Responses indicated lower levels of agreement with the value statements regarding certification challenges, professional autonomy, being listened to, and monetary gain. Those in administration had statistically significant higher intrinsic and extrinsic value scores ( P = .005) as compared with those in nonadministrative roles. There was no significant difference on perceived intrinsic or extrinsic values for those who work in an academic environment versus those who work in a community environment ( P = .25). After factor analysis, the PVCT-12 was found to have 3 factors that accounted for 53.4% of the total variation in the data: recognition of specialization, personal achievement, and professional accomplishment. CONCLUSION: The PVCT-12 incorporated a Likert-type scale to provide levels of agreement for intrinsic and extrinsic values among stroke certified registered nurses and certified neuroscience registered nurses. To complement these findings, further research using open-ended questions is needed to improve our understanding of participant responses regarding complex values such as \\\"autonomy\\\" and the \\\"extent of being listened to.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"208-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000667\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:目的:本研究旨在探讨获得神经科学或中风护理认证的人员对认证价值的感知。方法:认证感知价值工具-12(PVCT-12)由 12 个与认证益处相关的价值陈述组成,采用李克特 4 点量表,从非常不同意到非常同意不等。我们使用描述性统计来确定受访者对 PVCT-12 各项目同意的百分比。然后使用广义线性模型方法估计年龄、性别、种族、经验、认证、最高学位、主要职责和主要工作环境与内在和外在价值之间的关联。还进行了探索性因子分析,以确定发现相关变量的因子。结果:632 名认证者主要为女性(90%),平均年龄为 54 岁。约 80% 为白人,其次是亚裔(11%)、西班牙裔(4%)和黑人(3%)。认证包括神经科学认证注册护士(34%)、中风认证注册护士(47%)或两者(20%)。约 57% 的认证者在重症监护/内科-外科部门工作。工作环境包括学术环境(46%)和社区环境(42%)。调查结果显示,对认证挑战、专业自主、被倾听和金钱收益等价值声明的认同度较低。与非行政人员相比,行政人员的内在和外在价值得分在统计学上明显更高(P = .005)。在学术环境中工作的人与在社区环境中工作的人在感知到的内在或外在价值方面没有明显差异 ( P = .25)。经过因子分析,发现 PVCT-12 有 3 个因子,占数据总变化的 53.4%:对专业的认可、个人成就感和职业成就感。结论:PVCT-12 采用李克特量表,提供了中风认证注册护士和神经科学认证注册护士内在和外在价值观的一致程度。为了补充这些研究结果,还需要使用开放式问题进行进一步研究,以加深我们对参与者对 "自主性 "和 "被倾听的程度 "等复杂价值观的反应的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results From the Perceived Value of Certification Tool-12 Survey: Analysis of the Perceived Value of Certification Among Stroke and Neuroscience Nurses.

Abstract: AIM: The purpose of this study was to explore the perceived value of certification among those with a neuroscience or stroke nursing certification. METHODS: The Perceived Value of Certification Tool-12 (PVCT-12) consists of 12 value statements related to the benefits of certification, using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the percentage of agreement among respondents with each of the PVCT-12 items. A generalized linear model approach was then used to estimate the associations between age, sex, race, experience, certification, highest degree earned, primary responsibility, and primary work setting with intrinsic and extrinsic values. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify factors on which related variables were found. RESULTS: The 632 certificants were predominantly female (90%) with a mean age of 54 years. Approximately 80% were White, followed by Asian (11%), Hispanic (4%), and Black (3%). Certification included certified neuroscience registered nurse (34%), stroke certified registered nurse (47%), or both (20%). Approximately 57% of the certificants work in critical care/medical-surgical units. Work setting included academic (46%) and community (42%). Responses indicated lower levels of agreement with the value statements regarding certification challenges, professional autonomy, being listened to, and monetary gain. Those in administration had statistically significant higher intrinsic and extrinsic value scores ( P = .005) as compared with those in nonadministrative roles. There was no significant difference on perceived intrinsic or extrinsic values for those who work in an academic environment versus those who work in a community environment ( P = .25). After factor analysis, the PVCT-12 was found to have 3 factors that accounted for 53.4% of the total variation in the data: recognition of specialization, personal achievement, and professional accomplishment. CONCLUSION: The PVCT-12 incorporated a Likert-type scale to provide levels of agreement for intrinsic and extrinsic values among stroke certified registered nurses and certified neuroscience registered nurses. To complement these findings, further research using open-ended questions is needed to improve our understanding of participant responses regarding complex values such as "autonomy" and the "extent of being listened to."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Journal of Neuroscience Nursing CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
30.40%
发文量
110
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing (JNN), the official journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, contains original articles on advances in neurosurgical and neurological techniques as they affect nursing care, theory and research, as well as commentary on the roles of the neuroscience nurse in the health care team. The journal provides information to nurses and health care professionals working in diverse areas of neuroscience patient care such as multi-specialty and neuroscience intensive care units, general neuroscience units, combination units (neuro/ortho, neuromuscular/rehabilitation, neuropsychiatry, neurogerontology), rehabilitation units, medical-surgical units, pediatric units, emergency and trauma departments, and surgery. The information is applicable to professionals working in clinical, research, administrative, and educational settings.
期刊最新文献
Resilience of Patients With Brain Tumor While Awaiting Surgery Fever, Hyperglycemia, and Swallowing Management in Stroke Unit and Non–Stroke-Unit European Hospitals: A Quality in Acute Stroke Care (QASC) Europe Substudy Peer Review Should Be a Partnership to Help the Author Get Published Multidisciplinary Teamwork Perceptions When Mobilizing Ventilated Neurosurgery Patients. Illness Uncertainty of the Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Coil Embolization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1