白内障手术前继续使用或不使用常规血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂后的血流动力学变化:一项比较研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Current Hypertension Reviews Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1573402119666230112110328
Saeed Khademi, Reza Jouybar, Sedigheh Ahmadi, Naeimehossadat Asmarian, Maryam Ghadimi, Mehrdad Salari, Soodabeh Emami
{"title":"白内障手术前继续使用或不使用常规血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂后的血流动力学变化:一项比较研究。","authors":"Saeed Khademi,&nbsp;Reza Jouybar,&nbsp;Sedigheh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Naeimehossadat Asmarian,&nbsp;Maryam Ghadimi,&nbsp;Mehrdad Salari,&nbsp;Soodabeh Emami","doi":"10.2174/1573402119666230112110328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In this study, we aimed to appraise the effects of interrupting (discontinuing) vs. continuing Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) on the hemodynamic changes of patients during and after cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Patients aged 40-70 years, American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) class II, taking ACEI/ARB medications, who were admitted to Khalili hospital (Shiraz, South of Iran) for cataract surgery, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups for continuing or withdrawing the use of ACEI/ARBs. Group 1 included the patients who continued ACEI/ARB administration, and group 2 included those who discontinued them before surgery. In the operating room, relevant demographic information was collected in addition to the data on patients' basic clinical status, including heart rate and blood pressure, before induction of anesthesia, during, and after that. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 21, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Any significant differences were not revealed in demographic variables (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, Myocardial infarction, Smoking, and duration of drug therapy) between the two groups. Time effect was significant (p<0.001) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate, and interaction between time*group was not significant (p = 0.431, p = 0.566, and p = 0.355) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate. However, the group effect wasn't significant (p=0.701, p=0.663, and p=0.669) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that in some minor surgeries, such as cataract surgery, withdrawal or continuation of ACEIs/ARBs have no significant effect on the hypotension and heart rate of patients during orafter an operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45941,"journal":{"name":"Current Hypertension Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic Changes after Continuing or Omitting Regular Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors before Cataract Surgery: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Saeed Khademi,&nbsp;Reza Jouybar,&nbsp;Sedigheh Ahmadi,&nbsp;Naeimehossadat Asmarian,&nbsp;Maryam Ghadimi,&nbsp;Mehrdad Salari,&nbsp;Soodabeh Emami\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1573402119666230112110328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In this study, we aimed to appraise the effects of interrupting (discontinuing) vs. continuing Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) on the hemodynamic changes of patients during and after cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Patients aged 40-70 years, American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) class II, taking ACEI/ARB medications, who were admitted to Khalili hospital (Shiraz, South of Iran) for cataract surgery, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups for continuing or withdrawing the use of ACEI/ARBs. Group 1 included the patients who continued ACEI/ARB administration, and group 2 included those who discontinued them before surgery. In the operating room, relevant demographic information was collected in addition to the data on patients' basic clinical status, including heart rate and blood pressure, before induction of anesthesia, during, and after that. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 21, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Any significant differences were not revealed in demographic variables (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, Myocardial infarction, Smoking, and duration of drug therapy) between the two groups. Time effect was significant (p<0.001) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate, and interaction between time*group was not significant (p = 0.431, p = 0.566, and p = 0.355) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate. However, the group effect wasn't significant (p=0.701, p=0.663, and p=0.669) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It seems that in some minor surgeries, such as cataract surgery, withdrawal or continuation of ACEIs/ARBs have no significant effect on the hypotension and heart rate of patients during orafter an operation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Hypertension Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Hypertension Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573402119666230112110328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Hypertension Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573402119666230112110328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在本研究中,我们旨在评估血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)对白内障手术期间和术后患者血流动力学变化的影响。方法和材料:年龄40-70岁,美国麻醉师学会(ASA) II级,服用ACEI/ARB药物,在Khalili医院(Shiraz, South of Iran)接受白内障手术的患者纳入研究。患者被随机分为两组继续或停止使用ACEI/ arb。组1包括继续服用ACEI/ARB的患者,组2包括术前停用ACEI/ARB的患者。在手术室中,除了收集患者在麻醉前、麻醉中、麻醉后的心率、血压等基本临床状况外,还收集了相关的人口统计信息。收集的数据采用SPSS 21进行分析,p值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:两组在人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、糖尿病、高血压、心肌梗死、吸烟、药物治疗持续时间)方面无显著差异。结论:在一些小型手术中,如白内障手术,停用或继续使用acei / arb对患者术中或术后低血压和心率无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hemodynamic Changes after Continuing or Omitting Regular Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors before Cataract Surgery: A Comparative Study.

Aims: In this study, we aimed to appraise the effects of interrupting (discontinuing) vs. continuing Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) on the hemodynamic changes of patients during and after cataract surgery.

Methods and materials: Patients aged 40-70 years, American society of anesthesiologist (ASA) class II, taking ACEI/ARB medications, who were admitted to Khalili hospital (Shiraz, South of Iran) for cataract surgery, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups for continuing or withdrawing the use of ACEI/ARBs. Group 1 included the patients who continued ACEI/ARB administration, and group 2 included those who discontinued them before surgery. In the operating room, relevant demographic information was collected in addition to the data on patients' basic clinical status, including heart rate and blood pressure, before induction of anesthesia, during, and after that. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 21, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: Any significant differences were not revealed in demographic variables (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, Myocardial infarction, Smoking, and duration of drug therapy) between the two groups. Time effect was significant (p<0.001) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate, and interaction between time*group was not significant (p = 0.431, p = 0.566, and p = 0.355) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate. However, the group effect wasn't significant (p=0.701, p=0.663, and p=0.669) for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate.

Conclusion: It seems that in some minor surgeries, such as cataract surgery, withdrawal or continuation of ACEIs/ARBs have no significant effect on the hypotension and heart rate of patients during orafter an operation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Hypertension Reviews
Current Hypertension Reviews PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Current Hypertension Reviews publishes frontier reviews/ mini-reviews, original research articles and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on hypertension and its related areas e.g. nephrology, clinical care, and therapy. The journal’s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers in the field of hypertension.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Challenges of Recruiting Older People for a Randomised Trial Assessing the Feasibility of Treating White Coat Hypertension in the UK General Practices: A Mixed-methods study. The New Editor-In-Chief Note. Treatment of Hypertension in Children. Screening for Hypertension in Adults of a Northern Delta Province in Vietnam. Highlights from the New European Society of Hypertension Guidelines Document.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1