与PSMA PET相比,骨扫描能在早期发现过度病变吗?蒙面独立读者的国际多中心回顾性研究。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-17 DOI:10.2967/jnumed.123.265916
Thomas A Hope, Matthias Benz, Fei Jiang, Daniel Thompson, Francesco Barbato, Roxana Juarez, Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Pawan Gupta, Wolfgang P Fendler, Jeremie Calais
{"title":"与PSMA PET相比,骨扫描能在早期发现过度病变吗?蒙面独立读者的国际多中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Thomas A Hope, Matthias Benz, Fei Jiang, Daniel Thompson, Francesco Barbato, Roxana Juarez, Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Pawan Gupta, Wolfgang P Fendler, Jeremie Calais","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.123.265916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has a higher accuracy than CT and bone scans to stage patients with prostate cancer. We do not understand how to apply clinical trial data based on conventional imaging to patients staged using PSMA PET. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ability of bone scans to detect osseous metastases using PSMA PET as a reference standard. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter retrospective diagnostic study, 167 patients with prostate cancer, who were imaged with bone scans and PSMA PET performed within 100 d, were included for analysis. Each study was interpreted by 3 masked readers, and the results of the PSMA PET were used as the reference standard. Endpoints were positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and specificity for bone scans. Additionally, interreader reproducibility, positivity rate, uptake on PSMA PET, and the number of lesions were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> In total, 167 patients were included, with 77 at initial staging, 60 in the biochemical recurrence and castration-sensitive prostate cancer setting, and 30 in the castration-resistant prostate cancer setting. In all patients, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.82), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), respectively. In patients at initial staging, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.26-0.63), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.88), respectively. Interreader agreement for bone disease was moderate for bone scans (Fleiss κ, 0.51) and substantial for the PSMA PET reference standard (Fleiss κ, 0.80). <b>Conclusion:</b> In this multicenter retrospective study, the PPV of bone scans was low in patients at initial staging, with 57% of positive bone scans being false positives. This suggests that a large proportion of patients considered low-volume metastatic by the bone scan actually had localized disease, which is critical when applying clinical data from trials such as the STAMPEDE M1 radiation therapy trial to patients being staged with PSMA PET.</p>","PeriodicalId":16758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Bone Scans Overstage Disease Compared with PSMA PET at Initial Staging? An International Multicenter Retrospective Study with Masked Independent Readers.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas A Hope, Matthias Benz, Fei Jiang, Daniel Thompson, Francesco Barbato, Roxana Juarez, Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni, Martin Allen-Auerbach, Pawan Gupta, Wolfgang P Fendler, Jeremie Calais\",\"doi\":\"10.2967/jnumed.123.265916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has a higher accuracy than CT and bone scans to stage patients with prostate cancer. We do not understand how to apply clinical trial data based on conventional imaging to patients staged using PSMA PET. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ability of bone scans to detect osseous metastases using PSMA PET as a reference standard. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter retrospective diagnostic study, 167 patients with prostate cancer, who were imaged with bone scans and PSMA PET performed within 100 d, were included for analysis. Each study was interpreted by 3 masked readers, and the results of the PSMA PET were used as the reference standard. Endpoints were positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and specificity for bone scans. Additionally, interreader reproducibility, positivity rate, uptake on PSMA PET, and the number of lesions were evaluated. <b>Results:</b> In total, 167 patients were included, with 77 at initial staging, 60 in the biochemical recurrence and castration-sensitive prostate cancer setting, and 30 in the castration-resistant prostate cancer setting. In all patients, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.82), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), respectively. In patients at initial staging, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.26-0.63), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.88), respectively. Interreader agreement for bone disease was moderate for bone scans (Fleiss κ, 0.51) and substantial for the PSMA PET reference standard (Fleiss κ, 0.80). <b>Conclusion:</b> In this multicenter retrospective study, the PPV of bone scans was low in patients at initial staging, with 57% of positive bone scans being false positives. This suggests that a large proportion of patients considered low-volume metastatic by the bone scan actually had localized disease, which is critical when applying clinical data from trials such as the STAMPEDE M1 radiation therapy trial to patients being staged with PSMA PET.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265916\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.265916","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)PET对前列腺癌症患者的分期具有比CT和骨扫描更高的准确性。我们不知道如何将基于常规成像的临床试验数据应用于使用PSMA PET分期的患者。因此,我们旨在使用PSMA PET作为参考标准来评估骨扫描检测骨转移的能力。方法:在这项多中心回顾性诊断研究中,纳入了167例癌症患者,他们在100天内进行了骨扫描和PSMA PET成像,以进行分析。每项研究由3名蒙面读者进行解释,PSMA PET的结果用作参考标准。终点是阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和骨扫描的特异性。此外,还评估了引物间的再现性、阳性率、PSMA PET摄取量和病变数量。结果:共纳入167例患者,其中77例处于初始分期,60例处于生化复发和去势敏感前列腺癌症环境,30例处于去势抵抗前列腺癌症环境。在所有患者中,骨扫描的PPV、NPV和特异性分别为0.73(95%CI,0.61-0.82)、0.82(95%CI)和0.82(95%CI,0.74-0.88)。在初始分期的患者中,骨扫描的PPV、NPV和特异性分别为0.43(95%CI,0.26-0.63)、0.94(95%CI、0.85-0.98)和0.80(95%CI,0.68-0.88)。骨扫描结果与骨病的相关性中等(Fleissκ,0.51),PSMA PET参考标准(Fleisκ,0.80)则基本一致。结论:在这项多中心回顾性研究中,骨扫描的PPV在初始分期的患者中较低,57%的阳性骨扫描为假阳性。这表明,通过骨扫描被认为是低容量转移的患者中,很大一部分实际上患有局限性疾病,这在将STAMPEDE M1放射治疗试验等试验的临床数据应用于PSMA PET分期患者时至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Bone Scans Overstage Disease Compared with PSMA PET at Initial Staging? An International Multicenter Retrospective Study with Masked Independent Readers.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has a higher accuracy than CT and bone scans to stage patients with prostate cancer. We do not understand how to apply clinical trial data based on conventional imaging to patients staged using PSMA PET. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the ability of bone scans to detect osseous metastases using PSMA PET as a reference standard. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective diagnostic study, 167 patients with prostate cancer, who were imaged with bone scans and PSMA PET performed within 100 d, were included for analysis. Each study was interpreted by 3 masked readers, and the results of the PSMA PET were used as the reference standard. Endpoints were positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and specificity for bone scans. Additionally, interreader reproducibility, positivity rate, uptake on PSMA PET, and the number of lesions were evaluated. Results: In total, 167 patients were included, with 77 at initial staging, 60 in the biochemical recurrence and castration-sensitive prostate cancer setting, and 30 in the castration-resistant prostate cancer setting. In all patients, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.82), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), respectively. In patients at initial staging, the PPV, NPV, and specificity for bone scans were 0.43 (95% CI, 0.26-0.63), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.85-0.98), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.88), respectively. Interreader agreement for bone disease was moderate for bone scans (Fleiss κ, 0.51) and substantial for the PSMA PET reference standard (Fleiss κ, 0.80). Conclusion: In this multicenter retrospective study, the PPV of bone scans was low in patients at initial staging, with 57% of positive bone scans being false positives. This suggests that a large proportion of patients considered low-volume metastatic by the bone scan actually had localized disease, which is critical when applying clinical data from trials such as the STAMPEDE M1 radiation therapy trial to patients being staged with PSMA PET.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Journal of Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
8.60%
发文量
340
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Medicine (JNM), self-published by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), provides readers worldwide with clinical and basic science investigations, continuing education articles, reviews, employment opportunities, and updates on practice and research. In the 2022 Journal Citation Reports (released in June 2023), JNM ranked sixth in impact among 203 medical journals worldwide in the radiology, nuclear medicine, and medical imaging category.
期刊最新文献
C-X-C Motif Chemokine Receptor 4-Directed Scintigraphy of Multiple Myeloma Using [99mTc]Tc-PentixaTec. Debating the Future of Nuclear Medicine: The Greek Experience. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Is Effective for Clinical Control of Symptomatic Metastatic Insulinoma: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis Identification of (R)-[18F]YH134 for Monoacylglycerol Lipase Neuroimaging and Exploration of Its Use for Central Nervous System and Peripheral Drug Development Value of68Ga-FAPI-04 and18F-FDG PET/CT in Early Prediction of Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1