人类延迟、概率和努力折扣之间的适度稳定性。

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Record Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.1007/s40732-023-00537-1
Gisel G Escobar, Silvia Morales-Chainé, Jeremy M Haynes, Carlos Santoyo, Suzanne H Mitchell
{"title":"人类延迟、概率和努力折扣之间的适度稳定性。","authors":"Gisel G Escobar, Silvia Morales-Chainé, Jeremy M Haynes, Carlos Santoyo, Suzanne H Mitchell","doi":"10.1007/s40732-023-00537-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The stability of delay discounting across time has been well-established. However, limited research has examined the stability of probability discounting, and no studies of the stability of effort discounting are available. The present study assessed the steady-state characteristics of delay, probability, and effort discounting tasks across time with hypothetical rewards in humans, as well as whether response characteristics suggested a common discounting equation. Participants completed delay, probability, and effort discounting tasks on three occasions. We found moderate relative stability of delay and probability tasks, and similar evidence for absolute stability across time for all tasks. The interclass correlations coefficient showed some correspondence across time points and tasks, and higher levels of between subject variability, especially for the effort discounting task, suggesting trait level variables has a stronger influence on performance than state level variables. Performance on the delay and probability tasks were moderately correlated and similar mathematical functions fit choice patterns on both tasks (hyperbolic), suggesting that delay and probability discounting processes shared some common elements. Lower correlations and different function fits suggested that effort discounting involves more unique features.</p>","PeriodicalId":47856,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Record","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderate Stability among Delay, Probability, and Effort Discounting in Humans.\",\"authors\":\"Gisel G Escobar, Silvia Morales-Chainé, Jeremy M Haynes, Carlos Santoyo, Suzanne H Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40732-023-00537-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The stability of delay discounting across time has been well-established. However, limited research has examined the stability of probability discounting, and no studies of the stability of effort discounting are available. The present study assessed the steady-state characteristics of delay, probability, and effort discounting tasks across time with hypothetical rewards in humans, as well as whether response characteristics suggested a common discounting equation. Participants completed delay, probability, and effort discounting tasks on three occasions. We found moderate relative stability of delay and probability tasks, and similar evidence for absolute stability across time for all tasks. The interclass correlations coefficient showed some correspondence across time points and tasks, and higher levels of between subject variability, especially for the effort discounting task, suggesting trait level variables has a stronger influence on performance than state level variables. Performance on the delay and probability tasks were moderately correlated and similar mathematical functions fit choice patterns on both tasks (hyperbolic), suggesting that delay and probability discounting processes shared some common elements. Lower correlations and different function fits suggested that effort discounting involves more unique features.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Record\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9931166/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-023-00537-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Record","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-023-00537-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

延迟贴现在不同时间段的稳定性已得到证实。然而,对概率折扣稳定性的研究有限,也没有对努力折扣稳定性的研究。本研究评估了人类在假定奖励的情况下,延迟、概率和努力折扣任务在不同时间内的稳态特征,以及反应特征是否暗示了一个共同的折扣方程。参与者共完成了三次延迟、概率和努力折扣任务。我们发现延迟和概率任务具有适度的相对稳定性,而所有任务在不同时间的绝对稳定性也有类似的证据。类间相关系数显示了不同时间点和不同任务之间的一些对应关系,以及更高水平的受试者之间的变异性,尤其是在努力折扣任务中,这表明特质水平变量比状态水平变量对成绩的影响更大。延迟任务和概率任务的成绩有一定的相关性,类似的数学函数适合这两项任务的选择模式(双曲线),表明延迟和概率折扣过程有一些共同点。较低的相关性和不同的函数拟合表明,努力折现涉及更多独特的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moderate Stability among Delay, Probability, and Effort Discounting in Humans.

The stability of delay discounting across time has been well-established. However, limited research has examined the stability of probability discounting, and no studies of the stability of effort discounting are available. The present study assessed the steady-state characteristics of delay, probability, and effort discounting tasks across time with hypothetical rewards in humans, as well as whether response characteristics suggested a common discounting equation. Participants completed delay, probability, and effort discounting tasks on three occasions. We found moderate relative stability of delay and probability tasks, and similar evidence for absolute stability across time for all tasks. The interclass correlations coefficient showed some correspondence across time points and tasks, and higher levels of between subject variability, especially for the effort discounting task, suggesting trait level variables has a stronger influence on performance than state level variables. Performance on the delay and probability tasks were moderately correlated and similar mathematical functions fit choice patterns on both tasks (hyperbolic), suggesting that delay and probability discounting processes shared some common elements. Lower correlations and different function fits suggested that effort discounting involves more unique features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Record
Psychological Record PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Psychological Record publishes empirical and conceptual articles related to the field of behavior analysis, behavior science, and behavior theory. The journal welcomes investigations of basic behavioral processes, as well as translational studies that bridge experimental and applied analyses of behavior. Conceptual articles pertinent to the theory and philosophy of behaviorism are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Respondent-Type Matching-to-Sample Procedure: A Comparison of One-to-Many and Linear Procedure for Establishing Equivalence Responding Avoiding the Tragedy of the Commons: Shaping Children’s Sustainable Behavior in a Digital Game The Role of Volume in Relational Density Theory: Isolating the Effects of Class Size and Nodal Distance on Density and Resistance in Equivalence Classes Feel the Func: Interpreting IRAP Performances Based on Cfunc versus Crel Stimulus Properties Under-explored effects of structure on equivalence class formation: A commentary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1