一项确定常规护理中药物相关问题(DRP)的观察性研究,以及采用计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的单位剂量分配系统(UDDS)评估临床风险和可预防性的专家小组评估。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Pharmazie Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1691/ph.2023.3557
F V Wildhagen, M P Neininger, J Hensen, A Steinbeck, O Zube, T Bertsche
{"title":"一项确定常规护理中药物相关问题(DRP)的观察性研究,以及采用计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)的单位剂量分配系统(UDDS)评估临床风险和可预防性的专家小组评估。","authors":"F V Wildhagen,&nbsp;M P Neininger,&nbsp;J Hensen,&nbsp;A Steinbeck,&nbsp;O Zube,&nbsp;T Bertsche","doi":"10.1691/ph.2023.3557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and aim:</i> Drug-related problems (DRP) jeopardize patient safety. Unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) with computerized-physician-order-entry (CPOE) and clinical-decision-support-systems (CDSS) were reported as a promising concept for preventing DRP. We aimed at identifying and categorizing DRP in peroral drug administration considering their clinical risk and preventability by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Investigations:</i> In surgical and internal-medicine departments, we observed routine procedures in peroral drug administration for DRP. An expert panel including pharmaceutical and nursing expertise categorized the identified 18 DRP categories into three levels: DRP that have not yet resulted in medication errors (ME) (Level-I), DRP where ME have occurred but have not yet reached the patient (Level-II), and DRP where ME have occurred and have reached the patient (Level-III). Additionally, the panel categorized DRP according to their clinical risk and whether the implementation of UDSS/CPOE/CDSS can prevent them. <i>Results:</i> In 77 surgical patients, 1,849 peroral drug administration procedures, and in 149 internal-medicine patients, 1,405 procedures were observed. The 18 DRP categories were identified with a frequency of 0.6%-26.7% (Level-I), 0.1%-21.5% (Level-II), and 0.0%-1.0% (Level-III). Of those, four categories were considered of high clinical risk: \"Name of the medication is not readable\", \"Prescribed medication is not prepared for administration\", \"An incorrect or non-prescribed medication is prepared\", and \"A medication is prepared for the wrong patient (mix-up)\". Twelve DRP categories were categorized as highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Conclusions:</i>Under routine conditions, we identified a substantial number of DRPs. An expert panel categorized many of those DRPs as clinically highly relevant and highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":20145,"journal":{"name":"Pharmazie","volume":"78 8","pages":"134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Observational Study to Identify Drug-related Problems (DRP) in Routine Care and An Expert Panel Assessment to Rate Clinical Risk and Preventability by Unit-dose Dispensing Systems (UDDS) with Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision-Support Systems (CDSS).\",\"authors\":\"F V Wildhagen,&nbsp;M P Neininger,&nbsp;J Hensen,&nbsp;A Steinbeck,&nbsp;O Zube,&nbsp;T Bertsche\",\"doi\":\"10.1691/ph.2023.3557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and aim:</i> Drug-related problems (DRP) jeopardize patient safety. Unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) with computerized-physician-order-entry (CPOE) and clinical-decision-support-systems (CDSS) were reported as a promising concept for preventing DRP. We aimed at identifying and categorizing DRP in peroral drug administration considering their clinical risk and preventability by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Investigations:</i> In surgical and internal-medicine departments, we observed routine procedures in peroral drug administration for DRP. An expert panel including pharmaceutical and nursing expertise categorized the identified 18 DRP categories into three levels: DRP that have not yet resulted in medication errors (ME) (Level-I), DRP where ME have occurred but have not yet reached the patient (Level-II), and DRP where ME have occurred and have reached the patient (Level-III). Additionally, the panel categorized DRP according to their clinical risk and whether the implementation of UDSS/CPOE/CDSS can prevent them. <i>Results:</i> In 77 surgical patients, 1,849 peroral drug administration procedures, and in 149 internal-medicine patients, 1,405 procedures were observed. The 18 DRP categories were identified with a frequency of 0.6%-26.7% (Level-I), 0.1%-21.5% (Level-II), and 0.0%-1.0% (Level-III). Of those, four categories were considered of high clinical risk: \\\"Name of the medication is not readable\\\", \\\"Prescribed medication is not prepared for administration\\\", \\\"An incorrect or non-prescribed medication is prepared\\\", and \\\"A medication is prepared for the wrong patient (mix-up)\\\". Twelve DRP categories were categorized as highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. <i>Conclusions:</i>Under routine conditions, we identified a substantial number of DRPs. An expert panel categorized many of those DRPs as clinically highly relevant and highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmazie\",\"volume\":\"78 8\",\"pages\":\"134-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmazie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2023.3557\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmazie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2023.3557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:药物相关问题(Drug-related problems, DRP)危及患者安全。据报道,单位剂量分配系统(UDDS)与计算机化医生订单输入(CPOE)和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)是预防DRP的一个有前途的概念。我们的目的是通过UDSS/CPOE/CDSS对口服给药中DRP的临床风险和可预防性进行识别和分类。调查:在外科和内科,我们观察了DRP的口服给药的常规程序。包括药学和护理专业知识在内的专家小组将确定的18个DRP类别分为三个级别:尚未导致用药错误(ME)的DRP(一级),已经发生ME但尚未影响到患者的DRP(二级),以及已经发生ME并已影响到患者的DRP(三级)。此外,专家组根据DRP的临床风险以及实施UDSS/CPOE/CDSS是否可以预防DRP进行分类。结果:77例外科患者有1849例经口给药程序,149例内科患者有1405例经口给药程序。18种DRP类型的识别频率分别为0.6% ~ 26.7%(一级)、0.1% ~ 21.5%(二级)和0.0% ~ 1.0%(三级)。其中,四类被认为具有高临床风险:“药物名称不可读”,“处方药物未准备给药”,“准备了不正确或非处方药物”,以及“为错误的患者准备了药物(混淆)”。12个DRP类别被UDSS/CPOE/CDSS列为高度可预防的类别。结论:在常规条件下,我们发现了大量的drp。一个专家小组将许多这些drp归类为临床高度相关,并通过UDSS/CPOE/CDSS高度可预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Observational Study to Identify Drug-related Problems (DRP) in Routine Care and An Expert Panel Assessment to Rate Clinical Risk and Preventability by Unit-dose Dispensing Systems (UDDS) with Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision-Support Systems (CDSS).

Background and aim: Drug-related problems (DRP) jeopardize patient safety. Unit-dose dispensing systems (UDDS) with computerized-physician-order-entry (CPOE) and clinical-decision-support-systems (CDSS) were reported as a promising concept for preventing DRP. We aimed at identifying and categorizing DRP in peroral drug administration considering their clinical risk and preventability by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. Investigations: In surgical and internal-medicine departments, we observed routine procedures in peroral drug administration for DRP. An expert panel including pharmaceutical and nursing expertise categorized the identified 18 DRP categories into three levels: DRP that have not yet resulted in medication errors (ME) (Level-I), DRP where ME have occurred but have not yet reached the patient (Level-II), and DRP where ME have occurred and have reached the patient (Level-III). Additionally, the panel categorized DRP according to their clinical risk and whether the implementation of UDSS/CPOE/CDSS can prevent them. Results: In 77 surgical patients, 1,849 peroral drug administration procedures, and in 149 internal-medicine patients, 1,405 procedures were observed. The 18 DRP categories were identified with a frequency of 0.6%-26.7% (Level-I), 0.1%-21.5% (Level-II), and 0.0%-1.0% (Level-III). Of those, four categories were considered of high clinical risk: "Name of the medication is not readable", "Prescribed medication is not prepared for administration", "An incorrect or non-prescribed medication is prepared", and "A medication is prepared for the wrong patient (mix-up)". Twelve DRP categories were categorized as highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS. Conclusions:Under routine conditions, we identified a substantial number of DRPs. An expert panel categorized many of those DRPs as clinically highly relevant and highly preventable by UDSS/CPOE/CDSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmazie
Pharmazie 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: The journal DiePharmazie publishs reviews, experimental studies, letters to the editor, as well as book reviews. The following fields of pharmacy are covered: Pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry; Pharmaceutical analysis and drug control; Pharmaceutical technolgy; Biopharmacy (biopharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, biotransformation); Experimental and clinical pharmacology; Pharmaceutical biology (pharmacognosy); Clinical pharmacy; History of pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
Georgios Photeinos and his Hellenic Pharmacopoeia (1835) published in Ottoman Smyrna. Impact of potentially inappropriate medications on emergency ambulance admissions in geriatric patients after discharge. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C polymorphisms are associated with major depressive disorder in the Saudi patients attending Erada complex for mental health and Erada services - Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Pharmaceutical company PLIVA: from Nobel laureate Vladimir Prelog to global blockbuster - antibiotic azithromycin. Pilot of a joint bed-side teaching course for medical and pharmacy university students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1