用于叶绿体组装和基因组脱脂的冷冻储存DNA和植物标本组织样本的比较

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1002/aps3.11527
Edward V. McAssey, Cassidy Downs, Mitsuko Yorkston, Clifford Morden, Karolina Heyduk
{"title":"用于叶绿体组装和基因组脱脂的冷冻储存DNA和植物标本组织样本的比较","authors":"Edward V. McAssey,&nbsp;Cassidy Downs,&nbsp;Mitsuko Yorkston,&nbsp;Clifford Morden,&nbsp;Karolina Heyduk","doi":"10.1002/aps3.11527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>The use of DNA from herbarium specimens is an increasingly important source for evolutionary studies in plant biology, particularly in cases where species are rare or difficult to obtain. Here we compare the utility of DNA from herbarium tissues to their freezer-stored DNA counterparts via the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Plants collected for the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library were simultaneously accessioned as herbarium specimens at the time of collection, from 1994–2019. Paired samples were sequenced using short-read sequencing and assessed for chloroplast assembly and nuclear gene recovery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Herbarium specimen–derived DNA was statistically more fragmented than freezer-stored DNA derived from fresh tissue, leading to poorer chloroplast assembly and overall lower coverage. The number of nuclear targets recovered varied mostly by total sequencing reads per library and age of specimen, but not by storage method (herbarium or long-term freezer). Although there was evidence of DNA damage in the samples, there was no evidence that it was related to the length of time in storage, whether frozen or as herbarium specimens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>DNA extracted from herbarium tissues will continue to be invaluable, despite being highly fragmented and degraded. Rare floras would benefit from both traditional herbarium storage methods and extracted DNA freezer banks.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11527","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of freezer-stored DNA and herbarium tissue samples for chloroplast assembly and genome skimming\",\"authors\":\"Edward V. McAssey,&nbsp;Cassidy Downs,&nbsp;Mitsuko Yorkston,&nbsp;Clifford Morden,&nbsp;Karolina Heyduk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aps3.11527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Premise</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of DNA from herbarium specimens is an increasingly important source for evolutionary studies in plant biology, particularly in cases where species are rare or difficult to obtain. Here we compare the utility of DNA from herbarium tissues to their freezer-stored DNA counterparts via the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Plants collected for the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library were simultaneously accessioned as herbarium specimens at the time of collection, from 1994–2019. Paired samples were sequenced using short-read sequencing and assessed for chloroplast assembly and nuclear gene recovery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Herbarium specimen–derived DNA was statistically more fragmented than freezer-stored DNA derived from fresh tissue, leading to poorer chloroplast assembly and overall lower coverage. The number of nuclear targets recovered varied mostly by total sequencing reads per library and age of specimen, but not by storage method (herbarium or long-term freezer). Although there was evidence of DNA damage in the samples, there was no evidence that it was related to the length of time in storage, whether frozen or as herbarium specimens.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>DNA extracted from herbarium tissues will continue to be invaluable, despite being highly fragmented and degraded. Rare floras would benefit from both traditional herbarium storage methods and extracted DNA freezer banks.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aps3.11527\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11527\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aps3.11527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从植物标本室标本中提取DNA是植物生物学进化研究中越来越重要的来源,特别是在物种稀少或难以获得的情况下。在这里,我们通过夏威夷植物DNA库比较了从植物标本组织中提取的DNA与冷冻储存的DNA的效用。方法1994-2019年,夏威夷植物DNA文库收集的植物在收集时同时作为标本馆标本加入。使用短读测序对配对样品进行测序,并评估叶绿体组装和核基因恢复。结果植物标本来源的DNA比冷冻保存的新鲜组织来源的DNA碎片化程度更高,导致叶绿体组装更差,总体覆盖率更低。核靶的数量主要受每个文库的总测序读数和标本年龄的影响,而不受保存方法(植物标本馆或长期冷冻)的影响。尽管有证据表明样本中存在DNA损伤,但没有证据表明这与储存时间长短有关,无论是冷冻还是作为植物标本馆标本。从植物标本组织中提取的DNA尽管高度破碎和退化,但仍将是无价的。稀有植物群将受益于传统的植物标本馆储存方法和提取的DNA冷冻库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of freezer-stored DNA and herbarium tissue samples for chloroplast assembly and genome skimming

Premise

The use of DNA from herbarium specimens is an increasingly important source for evolutionary studies in plant biology, particularly in cases where species are rare or difficult to obtain. Here we compare the utility of DNA from herbarium tissues to their freezer-stored DNA counterparts via the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library.

Methods

Plants collected for the Hawaiian Plant DNA Library were simultaneously accessioned as herbarium specimens at the time of collection, from 1994–2019. Paired samples were sequenced using short-read sequencing and assessed for chloroplast assembly and nuclear gene recovery.

Results

Herbarium specimen–derived DNA was statistically more fragmented than freezer-stored DNA derived from fresh tissue, leading to poorer chloroplast assembly and overall lower coverage. The number of nuclear targets recovered varied mostly by total sequencing reads per library and age of specimen, but not by storage method (herbarium or long-term freezer). Although there was evidence of DNA damage in the samples, there was no evidence that it was related to the length of time in storage, whether frozen or as herbarium specimens.

Discussion

DNA extracted from herbarium tissues will continue to be invaluable, despite being highly fragmented and degraded. Rare floras would benefit from both traditional herbarium storage methods and extracted DNA freezer banks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1